Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

NLXSK1 · Feb 11, 2012

Harrekin said:
So when Paul starts beating the Republicans at their own game you cry the rules should be changed? Lol@the conservative crybaby in the room.

I didnt say anything about changing the rules. I simply pointed out that Ron Paul isnt afraid of using dirty politics to get delegates that he did not legitimately earn to win the presidency.

As a voter however, this method of electing a primary candidate does not really ensure fair and honest elections.

desert dude · Feb 11, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
I didnt say anything about changing the rules. I simply pointed out that Ron Paul isnt afraid of using dirty politics to get delegates that he did not legitimately earn to win the presidency.

As a voter however, this method of electing a primary candidate does not really ensure fair and honest elections.

Paul is using the same tactics, more or less, that Obama used in 2008.

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 11, 2012

londonfog said:
Seriously Deprave do you get paid to do this ???? Please say you do, because I can't understand why someone would/could support such a losing cause for free.

1. Our cause isn't losing
2. We support it because we believe in it

Do you support causes only if its a guaranteed win or what?

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 11, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
I didnt say anything about changing the rules. I simply pointed out that Ron Paul isnt afraid of using dirty politics to get delegates that he did not legitimately earn to win the presidency.

As a voter however, this method of electing a primary candidate does not really ensure fair and honest elections.

How is that dirty politics? His supporters are staying at caucuses to be elected delegates... thats how the whole thing works.

NLXSK1 · Feb 11, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
How is that dirty politics? His supporters are staying at caucuses to be elected delegates... thats how the whole thing works.

Then they are supposed to vote in proportion to the primary. in this case they are ignoring the popular vote and all voting for Ron Paul.

Now, if you and all your friends went and voted for a politician and that politician won the popular vote by a good margin but the people that supposedly represented you voted for someone else and he won even though the majority of the people didnt vote for him, what would you call it?

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 11, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
Then they are supposed to vote in proportion to the primary. in this case they are ignoring the popular vote and all voting for Ron Paul.

Now, if you and all your friends went and voted for a politician and that politician won the popular vote by a good margin but the people that supposedly represented you voted for someone else and he won even though the majority of the people didnt vote for him, what would you call it?

I would call it ignorance or laziness of the people who didn't stay to be elected delegates by not understanding the process.

jesus of Cannabis · Feb 11, 2012

ron paul cannot win and will not win.......
Santorum has no chance either.,

Romney or Gingrich. either way its cool with me, i am all for the rich getting more money, which means my boss gets more money and can pay me more :-)

and Gingrich is starting ww3 which will end all the other BS thats happening all over the world, kill em all, we are the strongest and best and we will survive to rule the world. Is this the wake and bake thread?

dbkick · Feb 11, 2012

I love posting in this section of the forum, I can address ANYTHING here in one sentence " who gives a fuck? they're all a bunch of crooks/clowns."

londonfog · Feb 11, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
1. Our cause isn't losing
2. We support it because we believe in it

Do you support causes only if its a guaranteed win or what?

1. your cause was losing the minute Ron Paul ran for the POTUS as a Republican. The GOP will never give him the nod, but yet the old fool still ran GOP instead on Independent. A real cause will flourish on its own, so why run with the GOP ???

2. I support what I belief in and most times I'm winning, which should make you take a pause and see if you are making the right judgement calls...might help with the losing

lifegoesonbrah · Feb 11, 2012

londonfog said:
1. your cause was losing the minute Ron Paul ran for the POTUS as a Republican. The GOP will never give him the nod, but yet the old fool still ran GOP instead on Independent. A real cause will flourish on its own, so why run with the GOP ???

Running as an independent is stupid, nobody has ever won the presidency as an independent.

londonfog said:
2. I support what I belief in and most times I'm winning, which should make you take a pause and see if you are making the right judgement calls...might help with the losing

Our numbers are steadily increasing, I call that winning. Regardless that shouldn't play a factor in your beliefs, that is mob mentality.

Canna Sylvan · Feb 11, 2012

It will be hilarious if this Ron Paul strategy works and he gets all those delegates. He'll be laughing, and so will I.

NLXSK1 · Feb 11, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
I would call it ignorance or laziness of the people who didn't stay to be elected delegates by not understanding the process.

Ron Paul is supposed to be this guy that couldnt be bought, the guy that has a sterling reputation... The guy that would steal an election.... Wait, what?

Is he some sort of moral leader or just another politician? Seems like just another politician to me.

londonfog · Feb 11, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
Running as an independent is stupid, nobody has ever won the presidency as an independent.

So you admit that Ron Paul would never have a chance as an Independent ??? so much for this cause..but remember they also said we would never have a black POTUS, but hey I guess Ron Paul can only reach so high

lifegoesonbrah said:
Our numbers are steadily increasing, I call that winning. Regardless that shouldn't play a factor in your beliefs, that is mob mentality.

ok you kinda contradicting yourself ...if your numbers are growing, you should have zero problems running as a Independent... I mean with those growing numers you would win every election :roll:

..RON PAUL the candidate that could bring about change and guide this nation back to the greatness that she once was, but yet Ron runs as GOP in which he will never get the nod :sad:

.....and my beliefs are what guide me to vote the way I do...I think Obama would be better for me and this country then any of the clowns running that the GOP has brought forth

Canna Sylvan · Feb 11, 2012

NLXSK1 said:
Ron Paul is supposed to be this guy that couldnt be bought, the guy that has a sterling reputation... The guy that would steal an election.... Wait, what?

Is he some sort of moral leader or just another politician? Seems like just another politician to me.

How is it stealing? This is like the 300. Thousands of arabs went against only 300 Spartans and proportionally won. Why is being smarter stealing? If this works, Ron Paul supporters will have outlasted his opponents.

NLXSK1 · Feb 11, 2012

Canna Sylvan said:
How is it stealing? This is like the 300. Thousands of arabs went against only 300 Spartans and proportionally won. Why is being smarter stealing? If this works, Ron Paul supporters will have outlasted his opponents.

Is your argument that it is ok to cheat a little but cheating alot is bad?

LOL!

I am simply pointing out that the revered Ron Paul isnt above cheating to win an election. And that pretty much invalidates any character argument I have heard.

redivider · Feb 11, 2012

fyi

i'm merging every deprave ron paul thread from now on into the newest thread open. merge re-direct will only be up for one hour.

eyesky · Feb 11, 2012

londonfog said:
So you admit that Ron Paul would never have a chance as an Independent ??? so much for this cause..but remember they also said we would never have a black POTUS, but hey I guess Ron Paul can only reach so high

ok you kinda contradicting yourself ...if your numbers are growing, you should have zero problems running as a Independent... I mean with those growing numers you would win every election ..RON PAUL the candidate that could bring about change and guide this nation back to the greatness that she once was, but yet Ron runs as GOP in which he will never get the nod.....and my beliefs are what guide me to vote the way I do...I think Obama would be better for me and this country then any of the clowns running that the GOP has brought forth

I agree.... RP should have separated himself from the GOP! He would have stood a much better chance of attracting voters from both sides as an independent!!

Right now he is just another GOP 3rd nipple!

Still gonna right him in come Nov!

londonfog · Feb 11, 2012

eyesky said:
I agree.... RP should have separated himself from the GOP! He would have stood a much better chance of attracting voters from both sides as an independent!!

Right now he is just another GOP 3rd nipple!

Still gonna right him in come Nov!

at least you can see the truth

NLXSK1 · Feb 11, 2012

eyesky said:
I agree.... RP should have separated himself from the GOP! He would have stood a much better chance of attracting voters from both sides as an independent!!

Right now he is just another GOP 3rd nipple!

Still gonna right him in come Nov!

Make sure to spell his name write....

londonfog · Feb 11, 2012

^^^^^^lol..hey thats UB's job

Did Ron Paul Win Iowa, Nevada, Minnesota, Colorado and Missouri?

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

:-)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads