did you hear the news today?

desert dude

Well-Known Member
maybe ask the LGBTQ community. they might could tell you why, i reckon.



i reckon you're confused, stranger. up until now, the president's official position has been that marriage is between one man and one woman.

despite that, many like myself felt he was just politicking and that he did not really feel that way.

i present to you exhibit A: https://www.rollitup.org/politics/525906-obamas-second-term.html



if you think that was a biden gaffe, you have not been paying attention.

our commander in chief is the best troll in the land, and really knows how to toss the bait out there.

i present to you exhibit B: [video=youtube;n9mzJhvC-8E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9mzJhvC-8E[/video]



an incumbent president taking a stance on a hot button issue one day after 15 of his most highly sought after electoral votes overwhelmingly said otherwise is anything but desperation or cowardice, it is courageous and ballsy. real ballsy.

he might as well have said: "north carolina, take your 15 electoral votes and go fuck yourselves".

it's almost as ballsy as making the decision to send in seal team six to take out osama bin laden when lobbing a simple missile would have done the trick.



reference back to exhibit A. yes, i do believe obama is being genuine now.



so, your logic is that obama is doing this to boost his chances because he knows it is inconsequential? which is it, a boost, or inconsequential? it can't be both.



many independents, with respect to gay marriage, have views evolving in the same fashion as obama's views evolved. they have friends and co-workers that are in committed, same-sex relationships and see no reason why they shouldn't be able to get married.



your analysis is pretty pointless if, like you asserted, this issue will not define this election.

what is relevant is who controls the news cycle. and with precious days ticking down, obama is seemlessly controlling the news cycle as he did in 2008 with romney in an unenviable position.

that would explain exhibit C:
And what is Obama's position on gay marriage: leave it to the states to decide! Yep, a states' rights issue. He must want to resurrect George Wallace and entice the Uterus into breaking out scanned copies of his racist magazines.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Too bad the source on that "alleged" incident was not even present. LOL!

Speaking of bullying, little Barry shoved little Coretta because other boys accused him of being her boyfriend.

That's a first person account, BTW.

Your Messiah is a bully.
did he ever seek someone out who was minding his own business after rounding up a posse, tackle him, pin him down, and cut his hair while the kid who was younger than him cried and screamed?

because we have 5 independent accounts of that vicious attack that romney orchestrated.

Yep, he's dead.

Obama made the call.

Good for him.

But making the call was not ballsy.

Even Jimmy Carter would have made that call.

:fire:
that's because democrats have balls, and we have willard on tape saying that he would not have one into pakistan to get bin laden.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
And what is Obama's position on gay marriage: leave it to the states to decide! Yep, a states' rights issue. He must want to resurrect George Wallace and entice the Uterus into breaking out scanned copies of his racist magazines.
and i will say that leaving it to the states in this case is retarded and contrary to the 14th amendment.
 
Top