Humple
Well-Known Member
Datasheet says the ELG-240-C2100 is 93% efficient. Which LRS model has higher efficiency?Dude cancel that order... Get an LRS. They're more efficient than the eLg
Datasheet says the ELG-240-C2100 is 93% efficient. Which LRS model has higher efficiency?Dude cancel that order... Get an LRS. They're more efficient than the eLg
I'd like to know this also! @Stephenj37826 are the 2835 boards a long-term product?So do we know if V1 boards are a while supplies last type situation? Ive been putting off grabbing a few and now the 5000k ones are sold out.
Agreed. Better spread of light and you'll be able to keep the fixture closer to the canopy.Not used the QB96s but if your height restricted I would go for 3 boards since you would be able to get closer , plus better light uniformity, but that's just my opinion.
want to put 3x qb132's on a dimmable ip rated driver. would like to be able to max them out if necessary. Looks like that XLG would only give me 1400ma? Am i reading spec sheet correctly? edit: i don't think i am reading it right. What does 1400ma rated current mean?The XLG240 M any good for you? (Not sure what your doing)
They are a lot cheaper than HLGs
79-89% on the LRSDatasheet says the ELG-240-C2100 is 93% efficient. Which LRS model has higher efficiency?
It goes from 1400-2100mA and fits 3x 36v board with the possibility of adding another later If desired. Plus its ip67.want to put 3x qb132's on a dimmable ip rated driver. would like to be able to max them out if necessary. Looks like that XLG would only give me 1400ma? Am i reading spec sheet correctly? edit: i don't think i am reading it right.
Ok, imma order it! Thx!It goes from 1400-2100mA and fits 3x 36v board with the possibility of adding another later If desired. Plus its ip67.
Smaller and lighter than older meanwells. Efficiency 92.5 on the M version. Also considerably cheaper.
Like...SO COOL....they told me to keep the HLG-150h-36 i originally ordered! Guess I need some more QB's.....Ok, imma order it! Thx!
BTW MouserElectronics seems super cool about changing orders!
I would probably use a 320H-C2100. Would get you roughly 306wLooking to try these out but still skeptical not trying to spend a lot. What driver would you advise for running 3 288 v1 ?
Wouldnt a 480-2800 work for 3 in series?@AliasAKAsailA
3 xV1 falls into a quirky spot between drivers.
How much space are you looking to cover with em?
It will work.wouldnt it just put 3 in series to their max of 2800ma and youd only get 420w out of it.
Wouldnt have to use it full blast, just wondering if itd work like I think it does.
the QB96 have added red and deep red, if you're into that.I am trying to decide between the 320W (3 288QB boards on a long heat sink) or 360W ( 2 96QB boards) for a 2x4 area. Can anyone give me a reason to go with one over the other.
From all I have read they seem to be equally capable, but I am wondering if one has more penetration, cooler temps, etc...
Thanks in advance!
You have the potential to crank the QB96's to higher wattages than the 288's, and if you're considering the rspec then the 96's are less expensive. I presume that with higher output come better penetration.I am trying to decide between the 320W (3 288QB boards on a long heat sink) or 360W ( 2 96QB boards) for a 2x4 area. Can anyone give me a reason to go with one over the other.
From all I have read they seem to be equally capable, but I am wondering if one has more penetration, cooler temps, etc...
Thanks in advance!