Drained-pool-politics

M

mooray

Well-Known Member
Wattzzup said:
That is literally all he does on here. That’s why most of us just put him on ignore. He makes zero points and has no data to back up anything he says. And most of the stuff he says to look up doesn’t even mean what he’s trying to say. He just spews on and on like a rambling toddler.
Click to expand...
He doesn't seem to be rude or malicious, so that's appreciated. I'm just too impatient to take the long route.
 
CunningCanuk

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
mooray said:
Hey no offense, but I don't really want to go in circles drifting around if you're going to take something out of context and apply it to a completely different subject, in addition to complaining about making unsubstantiated claims while simultaneously making unsubstantiated claims. It was okay there for a minute, but I'll move on now. Cheers.
Click to expand...
We’ve all been there.

It’s a right of passage here in the politics section.
 
Wattzzup

Wattzzup

Well-Known Member
mooray said:
He doesn't seem to be rude or malicious, so that's appreciated. I'm just too impatient to take the long route.
Click to expand...
No but he will just try and control the conversation with questions that have nothing to do with what you’re even talking about.

Once you press him and he realizes he looks stupid, he starts with the memes. That’s how you know he’s giving up. Has he started with the memes?
 
Last edited:
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
mooray said:
Hey no offense, but I don't really want to go in circles drifting around if you're going to take something out of context and apply it to a completely different subject, in addition to complaining about making unsubstantiated claims while simultaneously making unsubstantiated claims. It was okay there for a minute, but I'll move on now. Cheers.
Click to expand...
You said the force was imagined. I gave an example of the force via a rhetorical statement regarding taxation and conscription. You claim I'm going in circles when I addressed your statement with two specific examples.

1615425182573.png
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Wattzzup said:
No but he will just try and control the conversation with questions that have nothing to do with what you’re even talking about.

Once you press him and he realized he looks stupid, he starts with the memes. That’s how you know he’s giving up. Has he started with the memes?
Click to expand...
hanimmal said:
View attachment 4849220
Click to expand...

Your ironic post is full of irony.

Presumably your 12 year old child comment is because you on the one hand are saying a person must have capacity to consent to an interaction and shouldn't be forced into a relationship, and if they are that is wrong. We agree on that point.

Then, out of the other side of your mouth, you imply "public schools" which are forcibly funded by many people who HAVEN'T consented to them should be funded in a nonconsensual way. We don't agree on that point and YOU don't even agree with the other side of your mouth on that point. Holding two opposing views at once is not very consistent or principled.

Fail.
 
MICHI-CAN

MICHI-CAN

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
I posted it on another thread yesterday.

I thought it made an important point and one that defines many of the policy problems Americans have. 40%+ of the voting population does not want to form a sharing community with those they consider to be enemies, the "other". This is reflected in how the education system is organized and why America is an outlier when it comes to healthcare, social programs and rates of incarceration. It is the core issue in America and for over 40% of the population it is the only issue, Trump focuses and symbolizes it. White people screw themselves over this shit and it allows the 1% to avoid paying their fair share, they don't really care about taxes any more than they really care about Putin or Jesus for that matter.

Few things can jerk a persons chain so hard that their head pops off, fear, hate, racism and bigotry are among them.
Click to expand...
Way late to this party. As are we all. Racism is another necessary tool to divide and control. And it enslaved all ethnicities when the religious self entitled masters dictated. Colored were not the only exploited. terrorized, incarcerated or sold into servitude. I was a very ignorant causation or other as I self title. The elites are hell bent on owning us all. Get a clue. The better tanned guy than me is still fighting the same things we are subjected to and scape him for. Media, government psych ops and your use and discarding is the real issue. All colors need to break bread together and topple the scheme.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
MICHI-CAN said:
Way late to this party. As are we all. Racism is another necessary tool to divide and control. And it enslaved all ethnicities when the religious self entitled masters dictated. Colored were not the only exploited. terrorized, incarcerated or sold into servitude. I was a very ignorant causation or other as I self title. The elites are hell bent on owning us all. Get a clue. The better tanned guy than me is still fighting the same things we are subjected to and scape him for. Media, government psych ops and your use and discarding is the real issue. All colors need to break bread together and topple the scheme.
Click to expand...
The wealthy use social division to their advantage, the republicans (trumpers) don't give a shit about anything but white tribalism and the elected republicans don't care about anything but money, power and sucking their deplorable base's ass. Neither wing cares a whit for the country, patriotism, the Russians, democracy, or the constitution, anything for power, lie cheat steal and commit treason, or support it. They are not just unfit to hold office, but a real and present danger to the republic and cannot be allowed to hold power again.
 
DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
insomnia65 said:
Pigs in a trough = politicians
Click to expand...
An over generalization, more true for republicans than democrats at this point in history. If the voters in a district are racist, they will elect the likes Matt Gaetz or Donald Trump. Democratic voters are not driven by the same things and most democrats caught up in scandal resign. Cuomo is under pressure to resign by his own party and is defiant, he never broke the law though, just behaved like a heel because he was conditioned that way by his life experience. Still I figure his career is over in the democratic party. We all have seen what republicans are willing to tolerate in their politicians, kids in cages, treason and mass murder of citizens through dereliction of duty for starters. We haven't even mentioned good old fashioned corruption which seems quaint these days when compared to insurrection and sedition.
 
insomnia65

insomnia65

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
An over generalization, more true for republicans than democrats at this point in history. If the voters in a district are racist, they will elect the likes Matt Gaetz or Donald Trump. Democratic voters are not driven by the same things and most democrats caught up in scandal resign. Cuomo is under pressure to resign by his own party and is defiant, he never broke the law though, just behaved like a heel because he was conditioned that way by his life experience. Still I figure his career is over in the democratic party. We all have seen what republicans are willing to tolerate in their politicians, kids in cages, treason and mass murder of citizens through dereliction of duty for starters. We haven't even mentioned good old fashioned corruption which seems quaint these days when compared to insurrection and sedition.
Click to expand...
It's not an over exaggeration for me at all, Bernie Sanders I think is the only politician laterly that's been a person of honour.

I don't think a republican would agree with your view.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Your ironic post is full of irony.

Presumably your 12 year old child comment is because you on the one hand are saying a person must have capacity to consent to an interaction and shouldn't be forced into a relationship, and if they are that is wrong. We agree on that point.

Then, out of the other side of your mouth, you imply "public schools" which are forcibly funded by many people who HAVEN'T consented to them should be funded in a nonconsensual way. We don't agree on that point and YOU don't even agree with the other side of your mouth on that point. Holding two opposing views at once is not very consistent or principled.

Fail.
Click to expand...
right old chap, but remember when you signed your Closing Statement..tax escrow line? that was your agreement to pay those taxes to local, city and state or you can't own a home.

did you see a line that said 'Selective Taxes'? this is not a buffet, you can't pick and choose your taxes- you are part of a community and must pay your share whether you have 0 kids or 12 kids.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top