homebrewer
Well-Known Member
Just because they give a dosage suggestion for a certain application doesn't mean that was its intended use. That is where you're misinterpreting things.Lol. I quote the label. You call it "misinterpreting."
Just because they give a dosage suggestion for a certain application doesn't mean that was its intended use. That is where you're misinterpreting things.Lol. I quote the label. You call it "misinterpreting."
before you go shooting your mouth off, HB has a point, seasoned growers dont 'quote' labelsLol. I quote the label. You call it "misinterpreting."
Where is the problem?Could that b my problem
Where is the problem?
Actually yeah. Homebrewer knows his shit. And Harley Smith dispels alot of forum bro science if you listen to him. Reasearch nitrates being converted to nitrites in foliar spraying. Most definitely....some smart individuals can know more (with testing and research) than a manufacturer....the industry is chocked full of carpetbaggers that dont know the products they are selling or dont care. Leave the nitrates for the medium root zone. Spray fulvic and kelp extracts for the leaves i say.Well, perhaps. I don't know, I'm just quoting the label. The product is Dynagro's, not mine, and so is the label and its application rates. I no longer use DG and have no skin in this game. But I have used it as a foliar in the past with good results.
Its possible you, Harley Smith or @homebrewer knows more about the product than the company that makes it. That'd be great. Lol.
But getting back to the original point: when someone who claims to not foliar feed offers advice contrary to the company's recommendation, AS WELL AS my personal experience, Ima point it out. That's all.View attachment 3452922
Nothing herein came out my ass.