Electric sky ES 300

DesertPlants said:

I would be concerned about the details there... they don't appear to be accurate. Samsung lm301b diodes don't come in a 95 cri bin and 7.18 amps at 110 volts is 789.8 watts, not 880.

I would try to get some details about the drivers they are actually using.

Click to expand...

Prince Vegeta said:

Thanks for understanding. Please post these specs, as previously stated to disregard the info I sent last email, because there were not the correct specs. Those are the previous specs for the previous prototype we were testing before production. The Bar8 features a few unique designs, including our pat-pending form-factor that allows the bars to slide back and forth, detach and used separately in pairs (Bar2 configuration) for supplemental, side lighting, etc.. Detached, the Bar8 is capable of flowering up to a 4.5 x 7 and veg up to a 5 x 8.


SolarBar800 (Bar


Dimensions: 47.08''X46.93''X3.3''

Wattage : 900w (dimmable)
Amperage :7.18A @110V/3.59A @220V
Electrical efficiency: 2.7J@660w. 2.6J@900w
PPF: 1782µmol/m2/s(660w), 2288µmol/m2/s(900w)
Spectrum: SolarSpec 95cri enhanced white
LED: Samsung LM301B/Oslon
Driver: Meanwell (dimmable) w/remote power supply
Thermal management: passive
Coverage: flowering 4x4(660w), 5x5(900w), 4.5x7(detached @900w), veg 5x8 (detached@660w)
Recommended height over canopy: 6-18" without lenses, 24-60" with optional lenses


With these new specs
Is the light still as good? Or did I get the wool

Click to expand...

Prince Vegeta said:

Thanks for understanding. Please post these specs, as previously stated to disregard the info I sent last email, because there were not the correct specs. Those are the previous specs for the previous prototype we were testing before production. The Bar8 features a few unique designs, including our pat-pending form-factor that allows the bars to slide back and forth, detach and used separately in pairs (Bar2 configuration) for supplemental, side lighting, etc.. Detached, the Bar8 is capable of flowering up to a 4.5 x 7 and veg up to a 5 x 8.


SolarBar800 (Bar


Dimensions: 47.08''X46.93''X3.3''

Wattage : 900w (dimmable)
Amperage :7.18A @110V/3.59A @220V
Electrical efficiency: 2.7J@660w. 2.6J@900w
PPF: 1782µmol/m2/s(660w), 2288µmol/m2/s(900w)
Spectrum: SolarSpec 95cri enhanced white
LED: Samsung LM301B/Oslon
Driver: Meanwell (dimmable) w/remote power supply
Thermal management: passive
Coverage: flowering 4x4(660w), 5x5(900w), 4.5x7(detached @900w), veg 5x8 (detached@660w)
Recommended height over canopy: 6-18" without lenses, 24-60" with optional lenses


With these new specs
Is the light still as good? Or did I get the wool

Click to expand...

TEKNIK said:

I am skeptical that the light produces such high efficiency with a cri of 95. The light looks like great quality so I do not believe you were ripped. Do you have a picture of the spectrum by any chance?

Click to expand...

Prince Vegeta said:

No but i can ask for one
How would i phrase that question?
Just can i get a pic of the light spectrum this light hits?
He sent me a large PDF of testing done on it
But i can't figure out how to loaf the info on here other than many screenshots

Click to expand...

Prince Vegeta said:

So i decided on the solar bar8
Here's the specs
Could one of you guys decipher this and explain it to an led idiot like me ?

SolarBar800 specifications:

Dimensions: 47.08''X46.93''X3.3''
Wattage : 880w (dimmable)
Amperage :7.18A @110V/3.59A @220V Electrical efficiency: 2.7J@660w
PPF: 1780µmol/m2/s(660w), 2279µmol/m2/s(880w)
Spectrum: SolarSpec 95cri enhanced white
LED: Samsung LM301B/Oslon
Driver: Meanwell (dimmable) w/remote power supply
Thermal management: passive
Coverage: 4x4(660w), 5x5(attached @900w), 4.5x7(detached @900w) flowering and 5x8 veg (detached)
Recommended height over canopy: 6-18" without lenses, 24-60" with optional lenses View attachment 4294012 View attachment 4294014 View attachment 4294015


To replace a 1k hps in a 5x5 they recommend the new SolarBar800 (Bar. Designed specifically for commercial cannabis cultivation, it delivers the industry's highest ppf, ppfd and electrical efficiency of 2.7J. Features our pat-pending attach/detachable bar that can be used separately in pars in a Bar2 configuration for extra coverage, side/supplemental, etc.. Detached, the four Bar2's can be spaced evenly apart to flower up to an exceptional 4.5' x 7'@880w. It's flexible 6-60" recommended mounting height over canopy accommodate single and multi-tier applications.

The quote from the email on the light

So did I get ripped off or did i get a quality light?

Click to expand...

hybridway2 said:

You did well. Thats the light to have!

Click to expand...

TEKNIK said:

Don't get me wrong, quality seems fine, but I call bullshit on the cri 95 @ 2.7m/joule. I test led lights nearly everyday and if they have achieved that sort of efficacy then they have surpassed every other company in the world by about 2 years, show the data, I want to see a lab report, without a report you are actually doing harm to a company that probably has a good product just the wrong data.

Click to expand...

TEKNIK said:

Don't get me wrong, quality seems fine, but I call bullshit on the cri 95 @ 2.7m/joule. I test led lights nearly everyday and if they have achieved that sort of efficacy then they have surpassed every other company in the world by about 2 years, show the data, I want to see a lab report, without a report you are actually doing harm to a company that probably has a good product just the wrong data.

Click to expand...

Prince Vegeta said:

Cool there's the PDF does this have the info you knowledge guys are asking or? Could someone explain this

Click to expand...

DesertPlants said:

I would be concerned about the details there... they don't appear to be accurate. Samsung lm301b diodes don't come in a 95 cri bin and 7.18 amps at 110 volts is 789.8 watts, not 880.

I would try to get some details about the drivers they are actually using.

Click to expand...

hybridway2 said:

They've been 95 CRI for 5 yrs + bro.
MW drivers UL'd.

Click to expand...

TEKNIK said:

Don't get me wrong, quality seems fine, but I call bullshit on the cri 95 @ 2.7m/joule. I test led lights nearly everyday and if they have achieved that sort of efficacy then they have surpassed every other company in the world by about 2 years, show the data, I want to see a lab report, without a report you are actually doing harm to a company that probably has a good product just the wrong data.

Click to expand...

hybridway2 said:

View attachment 4295927
This is their original Equetorial spectrum.
The new one is a little different & i will prob share it via a Spectrometer here on riu .
Amare has the highest red content available that I'm aware of over any other enhanced white competition available. 630,660,730 is used as well as 470.
Opps wrong thread.

Click to expand...

TEKNIK said:

I want to see a sphere report not something done with a cheap hand held spectrometer that is over saturated so much it cant give a lux reading, show me something like the report I have attached here

Click to expand...

hybridway2 said:

You Are Not going to get it that easily! Lol!

Click to expand...