Really? You get bud using that little light in almost 100 sq feet?I don't think you need that much light. It's not a ? really as CAN you use too much light, I think it should be more is this ENOUGH light for the plant.. the rest is a waste of money. one 1000watt should be just fine for that space.. I have an 8X12 flowering room with 2 1000 watters if that gives you any idea. I could likely get away with 2 600 watters as well.. but I want to make sure I too had enough light.
of course hes going to get bud. what would u use in that space?Really? You get bud using that little light in almost 100 sq feet?
If money wasn't an option the optimum light for 100 sq feet is probably close to 1,000,000 lumens.of course hes going to get bud. what would u use in that space?
Man i think your a bit off. On a cloudless summer day the sun is only giving about 20000 - 30000 lumensIf money wasn't an option the optimum light for 100 sq feet is probably close to 1,000,000 lumens.
Nope, sorry. The problem is that plants used to grow EXTREMELY large outdoors. I'm talking the average weed plant was maybe 80-100 feet tall. See the sun has been dying for several thousands of years, so we really don't know exactly how many lumens it used to be outside. I don't even think 1,000,000 lumens in 100 sq. is enough really.Man i think your a bit off. On a cloudless summer day the sun is only giving about 20000 - 30000 lumens
Comment like that makes me think you really don't know much about growing and should go do more reading. So now it becomes.. do I even want to try and explain this to you. Optimum reflection from tin foil? ok.. no.I got nearly 3 oz from a bagseed grown with 3 60w incandecent bulbs, but I had the walls lined with tin foil for optimum reflection though.
you're definitely closer than him. It's more like 32,000 to a top end of 100,000 lumens at Earth's surface. But it's similar to the lumens produced from a HPS.Man i think your a bit off. On a cloudless summer day the sun is only giving about 20000 - 30000 lumens
Working backwards a little, the sun's total output without the earth's atmosphere in the way is about 1350 W/m². About half that is visible light, and the luminous efficacy of the solar spectrum is about 199 lm/W, so we get roughly 135,000 lumens/m². At the distance of the earth's orbit this energy falls on an imaginary sphere with a radius of 150 million kilometers, or 1.5 x 10^11 meters. The surface area of this sphere is 4*pi*r², or 2.827 x 10^23. Multiplying this by 135,000 lumens per m² gives us 3.816 x10^28 lumens, or put another way 38,160 trillion trillion lumens. Of course, this is an approximation, but it gives you some idea of the order of magnitude we're talking about here.Nope, sorry. The problem is that plants used to grow EXTREMELY large outdoors. I'm talking the average weed plant was maybe 80-100 feet tall. See the sun has been dying for several thousands of years, so we really don't know exactly how many lumens it used to be outside. I don't even think 1,000,000 lumens in 100 sq. is enough really.
You must take drugs or somethingComment like that makes me think you really don't know much about growing and should go do more reading. So now it becomes.. do I even want to try and explain this to you. Optimum reflection from tin foil? ok.. no.
Mylar...
and if you grew 3 oz with 180 watts of light.. (and I'm sorry but yes, my bullshit alarm has gone off..) then why would my 2000 watts not produce?
you're definitely closer than him. It's more like 32,000 to a top end of 100,000 lumens at Earth's surface. But it's similar to the lumens produced from a HPS.
Working backwards a little, the sun's total output without the earth's atmosphere in the way is about 1350 W/m². About half that is visible light, and the luminous efficacy of the solar spectrum is about 199 lm/W, so we get roughly 135,000 lumens/m². At the distance of the earth's orbit this energy falls on an imaginary sphere with a radius of 150 million kilometers, or 1.5 x 10^11 meters. The surface area of this sphere is 4*pi*r², or 2.827 x 10^23. Multiplying this by 135,000 lumens per m² gives us 3.816 x10^28 lumens, or put another way 38,160 trillion trillion lumens. Of course, this is an approximation, but it gives you some idea of the order of magnitude we're talking about here.
I'm just trying to help.. if you know better than me about the physics of lights and effects of lighting on plants.. please go ahead and teach me more about it, I always enjoy learning.
+Rep big time for handing out useful information.Comment like that makes me think you really don't know much about growing and should go do more reading. So now it becomes.. do I even want to try and explain this to you. Optimum reflection from tin foil? ok.. no.
Mylar...
and if you grew 3 oz with 180 watts of light.. (and I'm sorry but yes, my bullshit alarm has gone off..) then why would my 2000 watts not produce?
you're definitely closer than him. It's more like 32,000 to a top end of 100,000 lumens at Earth's surface. But it's similar to the lumens produced from a HPS.
Working backwards a little, the sun's total output without the earth's atmosphere in the way is about 1350 W/m². About half that is visible light, and the luminous efficacy of the solar spectrum is about 199 lm/W, so we get roughly 135,000 lumens/m². At the distance of the earth's orbit this energy falls on an imaginary sphere with a radius of 150 million kilometers, or 1.5 x 10^11 meters. The surface area of this sphere is 4*pi*r², or 2.827 x 10^23. Multiplying this by 135,000 lumens per m² gives us 3.816 x10^28 lumens, or put another way 38,160 trillion trillion lumens. Of course, this is an approximation, but it gives you some idea of the order of magnitude we're talking about here.
I'm just trying to help.. if you know better than me about the physics of lights and effects of lighting on plants.. please go ahead and teach me more about it, I always enjoy learning.