EXCUSE ME?!..The OFFICIAL Bernie Sanders For President 2016 Thread

ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
I hope the berners sabotage it for Clinton.
Click to expand...
I don't see my vote as sabotage; I don't want her as my president and I do have a (tiny) say in the matter.

It's not about her gender, it's not about where she's from; it's about what she stands for, and about the money she's taken from those increasingly few who own everything to make sure it stays this way.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I was keying off all the "we's" in the post I replied to when I said you should stop speaking for all of us. Although I support Bernie up to but not over the cliff, you certainly aren't speaking for me. In retrospect, looking at your post, I see that you were not. Your "we" was for the wee small group of Bernie baby lemmings, so I was wrong there.



Regarding your other shit, regarding how I've somehow swallowed a lie, or "shit hook", you are no better than London. You insist on one path and if a person isn't on it with you then you castigate them. Personally, I think you are OK but you are a bit of an asshole over this. I have as much right to my conscience as you. So fuck off.
Click to expand...
I'm here to debate topic which rarely happens..questions are asked with no responses just the same talking point rhetoric or no answer.

Is 'fuck off' your final leg to stand on?

How adult and pretty much my point.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
"Significantly, and perhaps the most telling characteristic of the two DNC potential candidates, is that Hillary does worse against the RNC nominee than Sanders does.

She also underperformed in most polls, against a candidate who this time last year had a near-zero political market saturation. He was nonexistent. Sanders on the other hand outperformed a large number of polls, and consistently swung double digit leads.

Consider this for an example:

If you took 50 100 meter races. And each and every time gave Clinton a 20 meter lead, and she lost almost 50% of those races, it would be highly debatable to say her opponent was a "weaker" runner. Especially if that runner had only just got into sprinting, and had poor running form.

So you have major points:

Clinton underperformed against polling. Sanders outperformed polls.

Clinton failed to maintain double digit leads.

Sanders consistently swung double digit leads.

Clinton performs worse against her outside competition. And can't hold independents.

Sanders does better amongg independents and performs better against outside competition.

At the end of the day, to say he lost the popular vote is one thing. To state that he is the weaker candidate fundamentally betrays the reality that we've experienced this election cycle."
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Uncle Ben said:
The DNC is corrupt, reason why it supported Crooked Hillary.

You lefties knew the fix was in from the get-go. Get over it.

The bitch is your nominee.
Click to expand...
What happens if the GOP says do over and won't let Trump run in the general?

Would you vote for who the establishment wants?
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
"Significantly, and perhaps the most telling characteristic of the two DNC potential candidates, is that Hillary does worse against the RNC nominee than Sanders does.

She also underperformed in most polls, against a candidate who this time last year had a near-zero political market saturation. He was nonexistent. Sanders on the other hand outperformed a large number of polls, and consistently swung double digit leads.

Consider this for an example:

If you took 50 100 meter races. And each and every time gave Clinton a 20 meter lead, and she lost almost 50% of those races, it would be highly debatable to say her opponent was a "weaker" runner. Especially if that runner had only just got into sprinting, and had poor running form.

So you have major points:

Clinton underperformed against polling. Sanders outperformed polls.

Clinton failed to maintain double digit leads.

Sanders consistently swung double digit leads.

Clinton performs worse against her outside competition. And can't hold independents.

Sanders does better amongg independents and performs better against outside competition.

At the end of the day, to say he lost the popular vote is one thing. To state that he is the weaker candidate fundamentally betrays the reality that we've experienced this election cycle."
Click to expand...
polls don't win elections. How many times do I have to repeat this.
The vote is what wins elections. Polls can be misleading and controlled.
Bernie lost the election. Stop your fucking crying.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
polls don't win elections. How many times do I have to repeat this.
The vote is what wins elections. Polls can be misleading and controlled.
Bernie lost the election. Stop your fucking crying.
Click to expand...
"At the end of the day, to say he lost the popular vote is one thing. To state that he is the weaker candidate fundamentally betrays the reality that we've experienced this election cycle."
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
"Significantly, and perhaps the most telling characteristic of the two DNC potential candidates, is that Hillary does worse against the RNC nominee than Sanders does.

She also underperformed in most polls, against a candidate who this time last year had a near-zero political market saturation. He was nonexistent. Sanders on the other hand outperformed a large number of polls, and consistently swung double digit leads.

Consider this for an example:

If you took 50 100 meter races. And each and every time gave Clinton a 20 meter lead, and she lost almost 50% of those races, it would be highly debatable to say her opponent was a "weaker" runner. Especially if that runner had only just got into sprinting, and had poor running form.

So you have major points:

Clinton underperformed against polling. Sanders outperformed polls.

Clinton failed to maintain double digit leads.

Sanders consistently swung double digit leads.

Clinton performs worse against her outside competition. And can't hold independents.

Sanders does better amongg independents and performs better against outside competition.

At the end of the day, to say he lost the popular vote is one thing. To state that he is the weaker candidate fundamentally betrays the reality that we've experienced this election cycle."
Click to expand...
BOOM.
 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
What happens if the GOP says do over and won't let Trump run in the general?

Would you vote for who the establishment wants?
Click to expand...
But who would run, they all tuck tail and whimpered off after voters made it clear that they've been fucking up for years.

 
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
MORON.
Click to expand...

You need to pick a stage of grief and finish it off and move on to the next.

This back and forth can't be good for your health.


Maybe you haven't lost all hope yet. I remember holding on to something once so strongly that it almost ruined me for life. Sometimes it still gets me, but it makes sense because reindeer can't really fly so...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top