F*CK THE POLICE!!!
- Thread starter bearkat42
- Start date
Nutes and Nugs
Well-Known Member
D528
Well-Known Member
“EXCESSIVE FORCE TRAINING”: SHOCKING POLICE VIDEO SHOWS HOW COPS ARE TAUGHT TO BRUTALIZE THE CITIZENS THEY ARE SWORN TO PROTECT
JUNE 3, 2016 | PIPER MCGOWIN | THE DAILY SHEEPLE | 3,929 VIEWS
It’s a great question: when did police go from that smiling guy there who swore to serve and protect us, to the scary, sadistic, mindless, brutal abuser who might beat, cripple, shoot and possibly kill an innocent civilian(or his dog… or his cat) at any moment?
Not one but two police academies have been suspended over video showing what some are referring to as “excessive force training” — cadets being taught to elbow people in the throat and slap them across the face hard enough to knock them to the ground. Stuff like that.
The Texas Commission of Law Enforcement suspended both the Lower Rio Grande Development Council Regional Police Academy and the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office Training Academy while they investigate the allegations of excessive force shown in the “cadet training” video, shot atTexas State Technical College in Harlingen, below.
Check it out: this is how the cops in America are “trained” to deal with citizens:
video here........
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/excessive-force-training-shocking-police-video-shows-how-cops-are-taught-to-brutalize-the-citizens-they-are-sworn-to-protect_062016
And they call this a “peace officer” course. What a joke.
There’s a difference between offensive measures and defensive measures. These things do not look like defensive measures at all. Defensive would suggest protecting one’s self from attacking, not attacking others.
Let’s be honest. If you didn’t know this was a police cadet training video when you first watched it, the whole thing would just look like some chubby dude smacking people around and teaching them how to be playground bullies.
The Lower Rio Grande Development Council claimed the video was shot “during a defensive tactic training session,” and “for the purposes of cadet instruction and feedback,” but after evaluating this practice and as a result of this incident, this method will not be used in the future.”
In other words, after it has embarrassingly come to light with video evidence they are training would-be cops to be brutal bullies adept in the use of offensive excessive force, they won’t be making any more videotapes for feedback (which can be used as evidence) in the future…not that the actual practice of teaching would-be cops to be brutal bullies adept in the use of excessive force will be in any way stopped.
No knew classes will be started until the investigations are concluded. The Sheriff’s Office training academy was also suspended pending a separate investigation, but details surrounding exactly why that is have not been released to the public, meaning it’s probably even worse than the video above.
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
trained by terrorist no doubt !
now the u.s. gets a little feeeling of what occupation feels like........Oppression is job #1
i cannot wait for the death of israel !
JUNE 3, 2016 | PIPER MCGOWIN | THE DAILY SHEEPLE | 3,929 VIEWS
It’s a great question: when did police go from that smiling guy there who swore to serve and protect us, to the scary, sadistic, mindless, brutal abuser who might beat, cripple, shoot and possibly kill an innocent civilian(or his dog… or his cat) at any moment?
Not one but two police academies have been suspended over video showing what some are referring to as “excessive force training” — cadets being taught to elbow people in the throat and slap them across the face hard enough to knock them to the ground. Stuff like that.
The Texas Commission of Law Enforcement suspended both the Lower Rio Grande Development Council Regional Police Academy and the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office Training Academy while they investigate the allegations of excessive force shown in the “cadet training” video, shot atTexas State Technical College in Harlingen, below.
Check it out: this is how the cops in America are “trained” to deal with citizens:
video here........
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/excessive-force-training-shocking-police-video-shows-how-cops-are-taught-to-brutalize-the-citizens-they-are-sworn-to-protect_062016
And they call this a “peace officer” course. What a joke.
There’s a difference between offensive measures and defensive measures. These things do not look like defensive measures at all. Defensive would suggest protecting one’s self from attacking, not attacking others.
Let’s be honest. If you didn’t know this was a police cadet training video when you first watched it, the whole thing would just look like some chubby dude smacking people around and teaching them how to be playground bullies.
The Lower Rio Grande Development Council claimed the video was shot “during a defensive tactic training session,” and “for the purposes of cadet instruction and feedback,” but after evaluating this practice and as a result of this incident, this method will not be used in the future.”
In other words, after it has embarrassingly come to light with video evidence they are training would-be cops to be brutal bullies adept in the use of offensive excessive force, they won’t be making any more videotapes for feedback (which can be used as evidence) in the future…not that the actual practice of teaching would-be cops to be brutal bullies adept in the use of excessive force will be in any way stopped.
No knew classes will be started until the investigations are concluded. The Sheriff’s Office training academy was also suspended pending a separate investigation, but details surrounding exactly why that is have not been released to the public, meaning it’s probably even worse than the video above.
...............................................................................................................................................................................................
trained by terrorist no doubt !
now the u.s. gets a little feeeling of what occupation feels like........Oppression is job #1
i cannot wait for the death of israel !
Last edited:
D528
Well-Known Member
Back when post is weird to me seing back then i was in the adam twelve car and met the blonde dude. What weird is back then is when police started showing kids drugs at school and telling them not to do them after ramping up how euphoric they make you feel. Fuck you cops. youve always been pawns in a nasty game of cat and mouse. Your pathetic ! oh that right , reminds me of being beat by 5 cops at 14yo in the prone position hands on car. there is no such thing as a good cop in my eyes. not even the ones that didnt partake and only watched me being beat.
A.K.A. Overgrowem
Well-Known Member
Keep reporting guys this stuff can't get enough exposure.
Rrog
Well-Known Member
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/midwest/ct-runnels-police-excessive-force-20160609-story.html
Cop is going to prison for 4 years. Hope he makes friends with lube.
Cop is going to prison for 4 years. Hope he makes friends with lube.
Drowning-Man
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
9leaves
Well-Known Member
The only help the law offers is to punish you for what you have done. It takes 7 minutes for a pig to get to my house. If there was a break in I would be getting it up the ass by then. Not cool. Oh yes I'm white but they still don't want to help me. I mean real white. I don't get tan from the sun. Only get burnt. So I'm a pale whitey. A regular cracker hold the salt.
D528
Well-Known Member
media showing this murderer some love for killing his family. Tell ya what , if it were you or me a simple civilian the the verbage would no doubt be much harsher . Poor cop , gimmi a fucking break . Yet people want only cops to own guns. Come on now...
.
How this panty waste ?
welcome to the third world..................
How this panty waste ?
welcome to the third world..................
Last edited:
D528
Well-Known Member
fuck you judges too !
Supreme Court Rules Cops Can Break the Law to Enforce the Law
In a split 5-3 decision, the justices voted to reinstate the drug-related convictions of Joseph Edward Strieff.
In the case of Strieff, he was illegally detained during a “concededly unconstitutional detention,” which eventually led to the discovery of drugs inside his vehicle.
police state.
Given the reality of the militarized police state rising up from the horrors of the war on drugs, the fact that cops can now legally act illegally to bust people for possessing arbitrary substances is chilling.
As if breaking the law wasn’t enough, prior to this ruling, police were no longer required to even give the appearance of an understanding of the laws they’re tasked with enforcing, thanks to a recent court decision surpassing even the veritable green light previously granted in Heien v. North Carolina.
In the Heien case, the Supreme Court ruled a “police officer’s reasonable mistake of law gives rise to reasonable suspicion that justifies a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.”
A motorist’s broken tail light caused an officer to make a traffic stop — during which evidence of a separate violation of the law was discovered in the vehicle.
But in North Carolina, a broken tail light wasn’t illegal, thus not sufficient cause to justify the stop — nor the arrests stemming from it, lawyers argued, because that would be a violation of unreasonable searches and seizures.
However, the Supreme Court ruled the officer’s ignorance of the law essentially didn’t matter — effectively allowing police around the country the ability to make stops if they ‘reasonably’ believe the cause for the stop is legal.
Plainly, police can stop and search you despite ignorance of the law.
Now, in U.S. v Shelton Barnes et. al. — a case that seemed to slip by largely unnoticed — even that flimsy justification has been deemed too constricting of police power, and police ignorance can actually be used against you in a trial.
On Monday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in dissent that the decision in Utah vs. Edward Joseph Strieff, is a blow to constitutional rights.
“The court today holds that the discovery of a warrant for an unpaid parking ticket will forgive a police officer’s violation of your Fourth Amendment rights,” Sotomayor wrote.Sotomayor’s dissent was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan.
Now, police need not understand the law, or even abide by the law — to enforce the law. In what world is this considered acceptable?
Supreme Court Rules Cops Can Break the Law to Enforce the Law
In a split 5-3 decision, the justices voted to reinstate the drug-related convictions of Joseph Edward Strieff.
In the case of Strieff, he was illegally detained during a “concededly unconstitutional detention,” which eventually led to the discovery of drugs inside his vehicle.
police state.
Given the reality of the militarized police state rising up from the horrors of the war on drugs, the fact that cops can now legally act illegally to bust people for possessing arbitrary substances is chilling.
As if breaking the law wasn’t enough, prior to this ruling, police were no longer required to even give the appearance of an understanding of the laws they’re tasked with enforcing, thanks to a recent court decision surpassing even the veritable green light previously granted in Heien v. North Carolina.
In the Heien case, the Supreme Court ruled a “police officer’s reasonable mistake of law gives rise to reasonable suspicion that justifies a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.”
A motorist’s broken tail light caused an officer to make a traffic stop — during which evidence of a separate violation of the law was discovered in the vehicle.
But in North Carolina, a broken tail light wasn’t illegal, thus not sufficient cause to justify the stop — nor the arrests stemming from it, lawyers argued, because that would be a violation of unreasonable searches and seizures.
However, the Supreme Court ruled the officer’s ignorance of the law essentially didn’t matter — effectively allowing police around the country the ability to make stops if they ‘reasonably’ believe the cause for the stop is legal.
Plainly, police can stop and search you despite ignorance of the law.
Now, in U.S. v Shelton Barnes et. al. — a case that seemed to slip by largely unnoticed — even that flimsy justification has been deemed too constricting of police power, and police ignorance can actually be used against you in a trial.
On Monday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in dissent that the decision in Utah vs. Edward Joseph Strieff, is a blow to constitutional rights.
“The court today holds that the discovery of a warrant for an unpaid parking ticket will forgive a police officer’s violation of your Fourth Amendment rights,” Sotomayor wrote.Sotomayor’s dissent was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan.
Now, police need not understand the law, or even abide by the law — to enforce the law. In what world is this considered acceptable?
