Brick Top
New Member
The part I was questioning you believing was; "I saw Jerry Brown on CSPAN maybe 20 years ago talking about the economics of drug laws. The gist of his speech was that drug dealers by and large produce more for the GDP by being in prison than by being free." Maybe 20 years ago when it was totally illegal using the right numbers what he said could be made to look accurate. But there is no way in the world that if someone today used accurate numbers and true math that what he said would turn out to be true. I doubt it was true back when it said it.Well, since he was arguing that it's immoral to incarcerate people in order to prop up GDP... yes, i did believe him. Another interesting factoid i pulled from that speech is that, in California, the biggest opponent of drug law reform is the CO's union. Drug laws equal job security for them.
In another tread, and actually I have posted it in a number of times in different threads, but when the testing procedure for THC was changed and it resulted in what was a false major increase in the percentage of THC making modern strains inaccurately appear to be far more potent than strains of the past it saved many jobs at the DEA and at State versions of the DEA and rather than them losing jobs and having funding cut like it was being proposed by some at the time their funding was increased and more jobs were created.
Organizations like that will fight if for no other reason than to retain funding and retain jobs regardless of what factual evidence is presented about herb not only being safe but also highly beneficial to many for it's medicinal properties. Groups like that don't give a damn how many people suffer or how many honest citizens they turn into criminals. All they care about is keeping their jobs and getting their funding increased.