First time high.

Tell you what, You take a hit, right away, blow it shotgun into a chicks mouth or guys and see giving shotguns don`t get the other high.

Tell me all about the 95% after you do this, I`ll know you`re lying if you say the other isn`t just as high.

Try a strain that's more sativa dominant for that happy giggle crap. But, you might wanna' stay away from extremely potent or pure sativas until you've got a bit of experience under your belt.

Welcome to the club.

Ok, who in the fucking world is spreading this nonsense about Sativa? I've been seeing people spreading the same bullshit recently.

and you're a fucking moderator here spreading this fucking bullshit?????
Don't worry you can ban me if you like , I won't be back to this forum.

seriously though... Thc is thc.. "Pure Sativas" are no more potent than "pure indicas" and 25% thc is 25% thc regardless if it's on a sativa or Indica. Man I am about tired of the amateurs.

BenFranklin said:

Ok, who in the fucking world is spreading this nonsense about Sativa? I've been seeing people spreading the same bullshit recently.

and you're a fucking moderator here spreading this fucking bullshit?????
Don't worry you can ban me if you like , I won't be back to this forum.

seriously though... Thc is thc.. "Pure Sativas" are no more potent than "pure indicas" and 25% thc is 25% thc regardless if it's on a sativa or Indica. Man I am about tired of the amateurs.

Click to expand...

Did you know that there are more cannabinoids in Marijuana than THC? Crazy concept, but some of them also effect the body (and your high.) Indica strains tend to have more CBD, which mitigates the "head high," and gives you a more "body high."

While you'd have made a clever attack on my character, and an awesome "burn" post, had you been right, you aren't. Instead of an awesome burn, you had an epic fail.

mr sunshine said:

First time I got stoned I was high the end!!

Click to expand...

*like* me too! i did the bull dance from tee to green at a golf course at midnight, under the moonlight, laughin like a wild demon

minnesmoker said:

Did you know that there are more cannabinoids in Marijuana than THC? Crazy concept, but some of them also effect the body (and your high.) Indica strains tend to have more CBD, which mitigates the "head high," and gives you a more "body high."

While you'd have made a clever attack on my character, and an awesome "burn" post, had you been right, you aren't. Instead of an awesome burn, you had an epic fail.

Click to expand...

so are you trying to say, by implication, that pure sativas have consistently different cannabinoid profiles that would lead to the discussion of automatically linking sativas with high thc content?
It was my impression that Mr. Franklin wished to point out the very concept you more explicitly detailed in your response to him. Indeed, there seems no disagreement between the two of you: the two dominant varietals of cannabis sativa L., referred to here as Indica and Sativa, are not, in themselves, guaranteed to have any given cannabinoid profile. Hence, a 50/50 hybrid that is analyzed and found to have a high percentage of THC produces the effects consonant with that amount of thc. On the other hand, since you rightly point out that it is common for sativas to have cannabinoid profiles that include larger percentages of THC along with the cannabinoids that produce some of the more "psychedellic" effects, then selecting a plant that is "pure sativa" may allow the novice to hit upon a strain that suits his or her preferences more quickly. This does not, however, mean that the thc produced in a plant of pure indica genetics effects an individual by any mechanism separate from that activated by THC derived from a pure sativa. On the third hand, since we don't know how the organic synthesis of thc differs from plant to plant, it could very well be that there is some genetic truth to extant differences between thc synthesized by an indica dominant plant and that of a sativa dominant. Hence, the OP should really just experiment with strains that have reliable reviews.
peace, be easy,

minnesmoker said:

.... until you've got a bit of experience under your belt..

Click to expand...

I still like a mature, long flowering Sativa high best of all. I hadn't had anything close to this for years but smoked some at Xmas, Man what a rocket ship ride. Almost too much

a great read, "MARIJUANA AND THE CANNABINOIDS" Edited by Mahmoud A. ElSohly, PhD


http://files.iowamedicalmarijuana.org/imm/ElSohlyBook.pdf

BenFranklin said:

Ok, who in the fucking world is spreading this nonsense about Sativa? I've been seeing people spreading the same bullshit recently.

and you're a fucking moderator here spreading this fucking bullshit?????
Don't worry you can ban me if you like , I won't be back to this forum.

seriously though... Thc is thc.. "Pure Sativas" are no more potent than "pure indicas" and 25% thc is 25% thc regardless if it's on a sativa or Indica. Man I am about tired of the amateurs.

Click to expand...

Beer and Tequlia are the same as well....

Commander Strax said:

Beer and Tequlia are the same as well....

Click to expand...

tequila actually has a stimulant effect; a distillate of the agave plant and something brewed from a mash of grains are not really analogous to two varieties of the same plant either, in my opinion.

Dr.J20 said:

tequila actually has a stimulant effect; a distillate of the agave plant and something brewed from a mash of grains are not really analogous to two varieties of the same plant either, in my opinion.

Click to expand...

You missed the bus.

minnesmoker said:

You missed the bus.

Click to expand...

how so?
tequila, like all ethanol, in low dosages, can have a stimulant effect--it is called a biphasic response; While i was being cheeky on that point, comparing liquor and beer and sativa and indica do not seem analogous. beyond that, what bus have i missed? or are you saying that the thread is beyond what the initial post was interested in?

I'm saying that it's perfectly analogous, given the effect that different ratios of different cannabinoids have on a person.

10% alcohol by volume, is still 10% alcohol by volume.


we aren't talking CBD's, we are talking thc..... Thc, is thc, is thc........ Beofre there was ever indica in the USA, there was SATIVA's mostly from central and south America. It wasn't until the later 60's that indica was even BROUGHT to the USA for use in wide spread breeding programs.

Jamaicans to this day enjoy some of the "purest sativa" strains available, are you going to claim that the majority of peoplg in Jamaica are psychotics?

Thank you, Mr. Madison for being diplomatic where I could not.

by the way, folks can make up all sorts of anecdotes and misrepresent what was originally stated by the moderator, but, what was posted was bullshit. We're not talking about the claim of experience levels amingst users, i am directly confronting the claim that Sativas have a different sort of THC, than indicas.

Thats just wrong. Cbd's may alter the effects you feel from the plant. Cbd's do not alter thc. The plant carries both cbd and thc, some strains can be cbd dominant, while others are thc dominant. Cbd is related to couch lock highs that come with the indica varieties. While thc is more related to the clear psychedelic high prevalent in sativas. Its two different chemicals people effecting you two different ways.....

Apparently I am not the only person to realize this....

My final evidence is the BBC documentary “Should I Smoke Dope”. It’s actually an excellent programme, spoiled by the chav rock chick presenter who makes the whole thing come across as very trivial. In fact, it provides some fascinating information. In particular, when our heroine is fed intravenous THC alone and then combined with CBD. The results are revelatory and anyone who has experience of varieties of cannabis will recognise the truth in what is shown. It makes my point for me perfectly.


CBD doesn’t just cancel out THC and does nothing... Like water does to alcohol....