"Give us your poor"

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Not anymore.

Trump has unveiled his latest immigration policy, and as you can imagine, it sucks. In a move that should leave little doubt as to the core mission of his administration’s immigration reform campaign, he is attempting make it easier to deny people visas or green cards for being poor.

Announced yesterday, Trump's latest policy enables a new aspect to the review process for green card and citizenship applications: essentially implementing a system where applicants would be “sized up” based on their wealth and financial resources, health, education and English-language proficiency. Specifically, it dictates that evaluators should consider whether an applicant has used government assistance programs. This will target and punish legal immigrants who use safety net programs like SNAP, Medicaid, or government-subsidized housing.

According to acting US Citizenship and Immigration Services director Ken Cuccinelli, the new policy – which is scheduled to go into effect in 60 days – is aimed at “reinforcing the ideals of self-sufficiency and personal responsibility.

The main takeaway, though, is simple: it’s an obvious tactic to weed out “undesirables”. To pick and choose who is permitted to pursue a path to citizenship, and who doesn’t make the cut. To echo a refrain chanted at recent Trump rallies, it’s an officially sanctioned way to “send them back.”

This aligns nicely with Trump’s focus on keeping out immigrants from Mexico, Central America, and other regions with poor populations of predominantly people of color.

By giving priority to those who are wealthy and well-educated, the odds will skew heavily in favor of those who hail from richer and predominantly white regions. When giving examples of immigrants he’d welcome, Trump generally references European countries, such as Norway.

But this move targets legal immigrants who have followed the rules and gone through the proper channels to seek green cards or citizenship status, dramatically

This policy will force people into a cruel dilemma: if they forego benefits for which they are legally entitled in order to avoid risking their chances are permanent citizenship, they will likely suffer and struggle to survive. But if they opt to use those benefits, they could put their future as a US citizen in jeopardy. For many it will be a no-win situation, so their fucked. But that's the point, right?

Cuccinelli said that this policy would affect roughly 400,000 people a year, whose applications for a green card or permanent citizenship will now include a “meaningful analysis of whether they are likely to become a public charge.” Immigration advocates say the real impact could be much larger, with the policy easily being used in a broader way that could have ramifications for millions of current or future immigrants.

It is sad that the path to American citizenship may now be based on a system that that contradicts the words which are engraved on the Statue of Liberty, our most iconic symbol of national welcoming: “give me your tired, your poor…your homeless.”

Oh well, it was nice while it lasted, like the basic principals upon which this country was founded and made it a source of hope for the world, and it really did provide hope, until Trump came along.

Now all we have is a big pile of shit that is getting larger everyday that he is in office.

I just hope we survive him.
Cruelty is the point.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Poor, uneducated, unskilled people who are going to immediately need public assistance. Why the fuck would anybody want these people coming to the United States of America.
Why? Because we always have, except when you're trying to escape religious persecution like in WW2.

Picking and choosing always existed.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Lol, thread after thread of people railing against "socialized health care" the middle class will have to pay for, now you're mad because Trump wants to stop emigrating people based on expensive health issues the middle class will have to pay for.

Do you clowns even see the hypocrisy?
We pay for it already.

Well, you don't of course as you don't have a job. But those of us gainfully employed already pay for it. We pay for it our entire working lives but we can't use it until we're 65. It comes out of every paycheck you ever get.

What Medicare was supposed to be was a retirement plan. The money was supposed to be untouched by the government and invested in savings bonds to gain an annual return.

But Richard Nixon needed a way to pay for the Vietnam war, so he started using all that Social Security money as part of the annual budget. Republicans have been complaining about Medicare going broke ever since. Oddly, they're the ones that use the money for wars we have no business fighting to maintain kickbacks and slush funds of the military industrial complex they created.

But I digress...

All medicare for all would do is increase the FICA tax a good bit. Numbers vary, but the general consensus is that FICA would take somewhere between 5% to 8% of your income each check.

Now, that sounds like a lot, but it isn't comparatively. Here's some basic math for you to give you a better illustration:

The average individual health care plan in the United States right now costs about 500 dollars per month and comes with a 5,000 dollar deductible. You have co-pays on everything as well: doctor's visits, prescriptions, dental visits, etc.

So in premiums alone, they typical American pays 6,000 dollars per year for health insurance. IF he never, ever uses it.

The average household income in the U.S. is 59,000 dollars. The bad news is that household income is calculated by combining all sources of income in that house. So if you're a husband wife team or roommates which is the case most of the time, then you can figure the average individual income is actually 29,500 - we'll be kind and round it off to 30,000 dollars.

Now, making only 30,000 dollars, the typical American doesn't have any exemptions except for themselves. That means they're going to lose roughly 15% of that income to taxes, give or take.

So that leaves them in the end with right at 25,500 dollars.

By the time you figure the average rent, which is 1,400 dollars per year in the U.S. (divide that by two for this example) you pay 700 per month or 8,400 per year.

The average person can survive on 150 dollars of groceries per week. There's another 1,800 dollars per year.

So then you figure 150 per month for power. There's another 1,800 per year.

So, as we sit right now, the average American has spent 12,000 dollars for a place to live with a spouse/roomate, food to eat and electricity.

That leaves the average American just 13,500 dollars for everything else.

Car? Insurance alone is 1,500 per year on average. As if that weren't bad enough, the average American spends 4,416 dollars per year on gasoline.

So now you're down to just 7,584 dollars left.

So now let's go back and pay for that health insurance. Guess what?

You're now down to just 1,584 dollars to last you for the entire year. So if you do actually get sick, go to a doctor and have to pay out of pocket just one time, you're bankrupt.

So now you can see why at present roughly 45 million Americans do not have any sort of health insurance at all.

Now we back up to medicare for all. Remember all those taxes you paid in the beginning? Here's what is going to happen: Rather than having to pay 6,000 dollars per year for your own health care plan that comes with 5,000 dollar deductibles and all that crazy shit, you are going to pay an additional 2,100 dollars in taxes and get medicare.

Medicare has no deductible. It also dictates the price that hospitals can charge for anything. For instance: a heart bypass operation will cost someone with no insurance about 190,000 dollars. If you have a private carrier, the insurance company will negotiate that price down to around 70,000 dollars or so. But you have a 5,000 dollar deductible and the typical plan only pays 80%, so you'll be on the hook for 19,000 dollars of that bill.

Medicare would pay somewhere around 39,000 dollars for the same procedure. Medicare pays a straight 80%, there are no deductibles. So you go out of pocket 7,800 dollars, or roughly 59% LESS.

That is why republicans don't want medicare for all. Take a good look at who runs the insurance, drug companies and hospitals around the U.S. They're all republicans. If they pass medicare for all, they'll lose billions upon billions of dollars in profits overnight.

So before you go off on who pays for what, it would behoove you to get a job, pay for your own insurance, then talk to some folks that actually use medicare, look at the price differences and do some basic math.

I know that's asking more of you than you've ever done in your life, but give it a go.
 

BurtMaklin

Well-Known Member
No, it’s based on skin color you dumbass cancer on America
No, the cancer on America is the influence of wealth and power in politics, the fact corporations are assigned the same rights as citizens (and in many cases, more), and a justice system corrupted by profits and police unions. Politicians on both sides of the spectrum are bought and paid for by the same rich corporations/families that have stolen the power your constitution was meant to keep in the hands of the people. The Democrats will change as little as possible to give you the illusion they care about you, but they care just as little as the Republicans. All they care about is securing wealth and power for their families and contributors, living the fat life with benefits most Americans can only dream of.
 

BurtMaklin

Well-Known Member
We pay for it already.

Well, you don't of course as you don't have a job. But those of us gainfully employed already pay for it. We pay for it our entire working lives but we can't use it until we're 65. It comes out of every paycheck you ever get.

What Medicare was supposed to be was a retirement plan. The money was supposed to be untouched by the government and invested in savings bonds to gain an annual return.

But Richard Nixon needed a way to pay for the Vietnam war, so he started using all that Social Security money as part of the annual budget. Republicans have been complaining about Medicare going broke ever since. Oddly, they're the ones that use the money for wars we have no business fighting to maintain kickbacks and slush funds of the military industrial complex they created.

But I digress...

All medicare for all would do is increase the FICA tax a good bit. Numbers vary, but the general consensus is that FICA would take somewhere between 5% to 8% of your income each check.

Now, that sounds like a lot, but it isn't comparatively. Here's some basic math for you to give you a better illustration:

The average individual health care plan in the United States right now costs about 500 dollars per month and comes with a 5,000 dollar deductible. You have co-pays on everything as well: doctor's visits, prescriptions, dental visits, etc.

So in premiums alone, they typical American pays 6,000 dollars per year for health insurance. IF he never, ever uses it.

The average household income in the U.S. is 59,000 dollars. The bad news is that household income is calculated by combining all sources of income in that house. So if you're a husband wife team or roommates which is the case most of the time, then you can figure the average individual income is actually 29,500 - we'll be kind and round it off to 30,000 dollars.

Now, making only 30,000 dollars, the typical American doesn't have any exemptions except for themselves. That means they're going to lose roughly 15% of that income to taxes, give or take.

So that leaves them in the end with right at 25,500 dollars.

By the time you figure the average rent, which is 1,400 dollars per year in the U.S. (divide that by two for this example) you pay 700 per month or 8,400 per year.

The average person can survive on 150 dollars of groceries per week. There's another 1,800 dollars per year.

So then you figure 150 per month for power. There's another 1,800 per year.

So, as we sit right now, the average American has spent 12,000 dollars for a place to live with a spouse/roomate, food to eat and electricity.

That leaves the average American just 13,500 dollars for everything else.

Car? Insurance alone is 1,500 per year on average. As if that weren't bad enough, the average American spends 4,416 dollars per year on gasoline.

So now you're down to just 7,584 dollars left.

So now let's go back and pay for that health insurance. Guess what?

You're now down to just 1,584 dollars to last you for the entire year. So if you do actually get sick, go to a doctor and have to pay out of pocket just one time, you're bankrupt.

So now you can see why at present roughly 45 million Americans do not have any sort of health insurance at all.

Now we back up to medicare for all. Remember all those taxes you paid in the beginning? Here's what is going to happen: Rather than having to pay 6,000 dollars per year for your own health care plan that comes with 5,000 dollar deductibles and all that crazy shit, you are going to pay an additional 2,100 dollars in taxes and get medicare.

Medicare has no deductible. It also dictates the price that hospitals can charge for anything. For instance: a heart bypass operation will cost someone with no insurance about 190,000 dollars. If you have a private carrier, the insurance company will negotiate that price down to around 70,000 dollars or so. But you have a 5,000 dollar deductible and the typical plan only pays 80%, so you'll be on the hook for 19,000 dollars of that bill.

Medicare would pay somewhere around 39,000 dollars for the same procedure. Medicare pays a straight 80%, there are no deductibles. So you go out of pocket 7,800 dollars, or roughly 59% LESS.

That is why republicans don't want medicare for all. Take a good look at who runs the insurance, drug companies and hospitals around the U.S. They're all republicans. If they pass medicare for all, they'll lose billions upon billions of dollars in profits overnight.

So before you go off on who pays for what, it would behoove you to get a job, pay for your own insurance, then talk to some folks that actually use medicare, look at the price differences and do some basic math.

I know that's asking more of you than you've ever done in your life, but give it a go.
Yawn.

Medicare sucks. Demand better for yourselves, it's your money.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No, the cancer on America is the influence of wealth and power in politics, the fact corporations are assigned the same rights as citizens (and in many cases, more), and a justice system corrupted by profits and police unions. Politicians on both sides of the spectrum are bought and paid for by the same rich corporations/families that have stolen the power your constitution was meant to keep in the hands of the people. The Democrats will change as little as possible to give you the illusion they care about you, but they care just as little as the Republicans. All they care about is securing wealth and power for their families and contributors, living the fat life with benefits most Americans can only dream of.
No

Trumptards like you are cancer on America
 

Rider101

Well-Known Member
Trump is the symptom, not the disease.
In a Dictatorship its the dictator who is to blame in a Democracy its the morons who voted him in who are to blame. Then there is America that is not really a democracy because the electoral collage gave Trump his victory just like it did with Bush jr even though millions more voted for the other side. So who the fuck is really running America? A few rich assholes who are fucking the majority but Americans have been trained to salute the flag and follow orders. Want proof why else would America have the most people in jail in the world mostly for drug use and still have drug users supporting the government and believing that they are in the land of the free? Pure propaganda!
 
Top