workinit
Well-Known Member
Are there many things we accept as "best" or "the way" that are not necessarily best? I have grown in Soil, Soiless, Rockwool and now Coco. I have read and studied the methods of many "expert" growers both here and on other sites. I never used my own brain or saw with my own eyes. My plants would always green up very fast and without fail would start looking poorly by the 6th or 7th week of flower if not sooner. I have never been able to keep a plant indoors green and healthy through harvest. Why?
I read a few scientific articles and studied PH and such and came to a couple of conclusions. We feed way too much and PH too high. Also I have found that bottom feeding is far superior to top feeding. My current grow is by far the best up to this point. I am in day 20 of flower and have not fed over 400PPM one third of added PPM's are Calmagic. My water comes out of the tap at 125. This is what most people "recommend for seedlings and young clones yet I have plants 20 days of flower that are thriving at these levels.
I read a few articles about PH and came to the conclusion that plants take up nutrients much better with lower PH levels. I currently PH in Coco to 5.2 or 5.3. Plants seem to take up nutrients very well. I also noticed that P begins to precipitate around 6.0 becoming unavailable. I always ph the water THEN add nutrients as to avoid any precipitation during mixing. My trays have zero salt residue.
Bottom feeding is the shit. Think about this. If we are top feeding regardless of medium we are completely changing the TDS and PH of our medium at every feed very quickly. By bottom feeding the process is done slowly as the water/nutrients wick up through the medium. This also ensures that the roots have nutrients constantly replacing used PPM's by wicking over the roots.
I may be way off base but at this point it's hard to argue with the results.
I just throw about a half a gallon of fresh nutrients in the trays when the dry out and let them do their thing. Those pics were taken about 4 hours after lights on and by the end of the day they will be standing straight up. Where am I wrong here?
I read a few scientific articles and studied PH and such and came to a couple of conclusions. We feed way too much and PH too high. Also I have found that bottom feeding is far superior to top feeding. My current grow is by far the best up to this point. I am in day 20 of flower and have not fed over 400PPM one third of added PPM's are Calmagic. My water comes out of the tap at 125. This is what most people "recommend for seedlings and young clones yet I have plants 20 days of flower that are thriving at these levels.
I read a few articles about PH and came to the conclusion that plants take up nutrients much better with lower PH levels. I currently PH in Coco to 5.2 or 5.3. Plants seem to take up nutrients very well. I also noticed that P begins to precipitate around 6.0 becoming unavailable. I always ph the water THEN add nutrients as to avoid any precipitation during mixing. My trays have zero salt residue.
Bottom feeding is the shit. Think about this. If we are top feeding regardless of medium we are completely changing the TDS and PH of our medium at every feed very quickly. By bottom feeding the process is done slowly as the water/nutrients wick up through the medium. This also ensures that the roots have nutrients constantly replacing used PPM's by wicking over the roots.
I may be way off base but at this point it's hard to argue with the results.
I just throw about a half a gallon of fresh nutrients in the trays when the dry out and let them do their thing. Those pics were taken about 4 hours after lights on and by the end of the day they will be standing straight up. Where am I wrong here?
Last edited: