Guess what, I see that the hypothetical nature of this thread is actually preventing a logical and rational discussion.
There is No misinformation here!
**Due diligence is expected to be done before you throw up a rebuttal.
Im sure it doesnt take much to grow enough for "tea", I got that!! But really- how practical would that be? I refuse to get into the "how to's" of cocaine cultivation: It is pointless to me! However, the principle behind it warrants a response.
To me ofcourse , It wouldnt make any sense to cultivate ANY substance- of ANY schedule or class if the end result is only enough product to conjure up a few cups of tea. Give me a break. I see guys on this forum saying all the time that a micro gro that produces less than an .oz is not worth the effort/risk. (depending on where you live). Now why wouldnt that same principle apply to cocaine? Seems silly to me.
Anyhow....Depending on the state~ like maryjane~ cocaine laws vary. So.......
No I will not neccessarily get more time for cultivation of marijuana vs cocaine. I can thumb through some case law and dig out precedent if I cared to prove my point. (The varying laws are ambiguous at best, so I wont even touch that. )
Final thoughts:
IMO- (and this goes for most everything)- If the effort to produce something out weighs the benifits of the final product, It is likely not worth effort.