Guess the yeild of this mango puff

B

BITCHIMME

Well-Known Member
Let me start of by saying , this is just a fun guessing game nothing more,

This is one of six mango puffs I have in my 8k garden , this mango puff is in a 15 gallon , vegged for 6 weeks, temperature is on point and using co2, with a propane co2 burner to be exact, should've took measurents but forgot lol,

She's roughly 3to 3 1/2 feet tall and maybe 3 feet wide or slight under, currently at week 5 of flowering,

Let the games begin, will keep updated when it's chop time
 

Attachments

D

dirtpower

Well-Known Member
I can tell you one thing...them buds will never get as big as they could have...but I'm gonna guesstamate 6 zips...this is my first guesstament on a nude plant, so I'll be looking forward to see how close I am.
 
B

BITCHIMME

Well-Known Member
evergreengardener said:
Why please explain your reasoning
Click to expand...
Learned this technique from Joshua haupt and his book 3 a light, was skeptical at first but for me personally I love it, it allows for better light penetration thru out whole plant, everything forms into nugs, down to the very bottom, for me and my situation I wouldn't grow with out doing it , was tired of all the dark spots and schwaggy like hairs of a bud even though i use 8+ 1000 watters,
 
Odin*

Odin*

Well-Known Member
I usually don't chime in on "wait for weight" threads, but that plant is no where near indicative of "3 a light". Using the bamboo as a gauge, if guessing that you chopped now, you're under 2 zips (dry), if you're able to add size, as well as pack on weight (density), you might hit 3 (zips, dry, finished, in the next 3-4 weeks). Don't take this as a knock at your experience/knowledge/skill. I firmly believe that the majority of the "knowledge" within published "grow books" is anything, but "knowledge". Most of the "grow know" within these texts stems from "grow bro know", or is utter garbage. I'm almost inclined to believe that the "authors" are intentionally trying to divert the "blind" in the wrong direction in an effort to mitigate competition growth. So much of what I've read within their texts is contradictory to successful and science proven knowledge, that I have to believe that they are intentionally trying to "fuck up" newbie grows.

I hope it turns out well for you, but look beyond "grow bro" knowledge and "Gro Pro Science" books. They are literal shit, would you shit on your herb? I hope not.



To answer the question, if you cut at 63 days and weigh the buds at finished and curable, you've got 72g.
 
K

KryptoBud

Well-Known Member
“You’re looking for optimum light penetration through the canopy,” Haupt says. “Not only that, you’re refocusing the plant’s energy toward the top to generate new growth. When you schwazze your plants, you’re removing a lot of their ability to uptake sugar. The fan leaves are sugar factories and feed the flower. When they’re removed, you now have to feed the plant all that sugar and the micro/macro nutrients.”

That’s where Success Nutrients come in, providing the primary and secondary pH-buffered nutes necessary to sustain healthy plant growth.

That's a quote from the author. I've seen this book referenced on this site before, have never heard an explanation how the science of it works. I've never done it the way it's being shown so I'll hold my judgement until I have. I'll say this though some one selling a book for 500.00 dollars an getting people to buy it is a genius
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top