Gunviolence.org tricks NRA board member into giving a speech....
- Thread starter smokinrav
- Start date
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
It's always struck me as odd that many government school teachers, administrators and proponents claim to be vehemently "against gun violence".
Many of these same people claim that government ("public") schools have a mission to teach kids "bullying is bad".
They never address how much they LIKE guns, when it comes to how government school funding is derived.
It seems the blatant contradiction of funding schools via threats of violence is somehow "not bullying".
Government school proponents LOVE guns. That's a fact. If I'm wrong, I'd sure like to see the evidence.
Many of these same people claim that government ("public") schools have a mission to teach kids "bullying is bad".
They never address how much they LIKE guns, when it comes to how government school funding is derived.
It seems the blatant contradiction of funding schools via threats of violence is somehow "not bullying".
Government school proponents LOVE guns. That's a fact. If I'm wrong, I'd sure like to see the evidence.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
Choke on a bag of dicks troll
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Hmm, that's not the kind of evidence that disproves my point.
I'm sorry, but your argument fails. Miserably. Next.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
The tRUmp lover thinks dead children is fun.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You see, that's an erroneous assumption and yet another failed "argument".
The way to reduce school related gun violence is to understand and teach the difference between offensive force and defensive force. Voluntary versus involuntary, etc.
It's wrong to use or threaten the use of guns offensively. You seem to get that when it comes to school shootings, but not when it comes to school funding. If you want to end "gun violence" don't sanction the use of it while also decrying it. It's sort of a lame position to defend, but that's the one you apparently hold.
I maintain, government school proponents LOVE guns, can you offer an argument to refute that ?
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
The deplorable thinks he's clever, he's just deplorable.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
I'm afraid that's not a good argument either.
A deplorable is a person worthy of condemnation. For pointing out the contradiction in the "school shootings" , "must take guns" lame argument, I am not being deplorable. I am being cognizant and forthright.
You, on the other hand are being evasive, unimaginative and cognitively dissonant. Maybe even incontinent.
Have you checked your diapers ?
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
See what I mean, he's also desperate for attention, like a disturbed child.
captainmorgan
Well-Known Member
He proves my points with every post, sad really.
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Sense
This Picture Makes None
CunningCanuk
Well-Known Member
It’s just a matter of time before the delta variant saves us from his fucking nonsense.
except now it'd be a real gun and not one with an orange cap.
smokinrav
Well-Known Member
You don't get to claim something as fact and then demand others disprove your assertion. Classic troll move.
And don't get me started on that dumbass bile about teachers secretly loving guns because of.......funding? In the most critically underfunded public programs?
Shut up, troll
Ahh.. the "For the Children" argument. The exact same argument which was used to delay cannabis legalization for who knows how many decades.
Any time I see the "Think of the Children!!!" argument being used I assume it is being trotted out because the underlying logic of the argument is flawed crap and they must resort to an emotional appeal.
Our system doesn't give a flying fuck about the children and anyone who pulls that argument out is attempting to manipulate and misdirect. The system doesn't give a fuck about anything other than power and any time it it acts like it does it is merely a ruse to gain more power at your expense.
Firearms deaths are dwarfed by so many other preventable deaths where we can all agree what needs to be done. Why do you wallow in divisive topics which will not be resolved in our lifetime? It's pointless, counterproductive and it shows your brain has been hijacked and taken for a ride.
Any time I see the "Think of the Children!!!" argument being used I assume it is being trotted out because the underlying logic of the argument is flawed crap and they must resort to an emotional appeal.
Our system doesn't give a flying fuck about the children and anyone who pulls that argument out is attempting to manipulate and misdirect. The system doesn't give a fuck about anything other than power and any time it it acts like it does it is merely a ruse to gain more power at your expense.
Firearms deaths are dwarfed by so many other preventable deaths where we can all agree what needs to be done. Why do you wallow in divisive topics which will not be resolved in our lifetime? It's pointless, counterproductive and it shows your brain has been hijacked and taken for a ride.
DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
If the democrats win seats in the congress in 2022, then they can begin the process of gun regulation and control, among other things, like a domestic terrorist watch list. If they can win again from the assembled lunatics and crooks that the republicans have become, expect more changes with more wins, like HR-1 and voting rights to level the playing field and increase ballot access. Gun regulation is popular with super majority support, even a majority of gun owners support it, it's pretty low hanging fruit and besides the NRA screwed themselves to death.
Similar threads
