DragonPhoenix
Well-Known Member
It really depends on how many systems you've got and what your square footage is but for THREE bloom systems I would much rather have 3-4 600w HPS than 2 1000w and I'd rather have 4 600w HPS than 3 1000w as well. I'm an eco-friendly guy and the 600w HPS is the MOST efficient HID light you can get in terms of lumens per watt.I don't want to speak for SB but here's my thought. 3 600w units might cover the 3 setups easier but that's only 1800w vs. the 2000w he currently has. More coverage, less intensity, so that would be a downgrade, not an upgrade.
4 600 watters would be a balance between coverage and intensity. So it boils down to kind of how I put it in the previous post, less costly than 4 1000 watters, and more efficient coverage than the 2 1000 watters.
You factor that in with the fact that you can place the 600 watter closer, they produce less heat, and you have more sources of light and it really seals the deal for me. Other may have a different opinion but that's where I weigh in. I actually have 2 1000w and 1 600w HPS covering 3 systems now and to be honest the 1000w put off ALOT of heat compared to the 600w so you're gonna have to deal with that if you run the 1000w lamps.