BobCajun
Well-Known Member
Where does it say that only sick folk can post in this forum? That guy is just clearly under the influence of too much THC buildup. It's making him hostile and aggressive.
HEALTH CANADA :(
- Thread starter bigmanc
- Start date
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Do tell. You got any links to scientific studies or are we just to take your word for it? What is considered a safe thc intake level in your expert opinion? What are the health risks of exceeding that amount? If you are gonna make stupid claims on here, you are gonna get called on it. As for 'excess' THC making someone hostile and aggressive...in my 40 years of personal, hands-on, in-depth research, I have found cannabis to have the exact opposite effect. Not too many fist fights around a bong...So far everything you've said on here is complete bullshit intended to stir up shit.
So what's your story Bob? Is your life so pathetic that you need to get your kicks acting like an ass on a forum you are completely ignorant about? Or perhaps acting superior is your way of compensating for the fact that your life has been a complete failure? Just curious.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
Great link Bob. Weird how they didn't do a similar study to determine why 99.9% of heavy users experience no adverse side effects. Kinda like doing a study on people with penicillin allergies...they know the medicine caused the problem, but they are aware that it doesn't have that effect of most patients. . It involves vomiting and nausea and goes away in 24 hours...hardly a serious infliction or caused by a "build-up" of THC as you claimed. Again, in my 40 years of 'research' I have never seen a case.
But the question I have, Bob, is why are you here? You are not a patient, you don't know any of us, yet you seem to want to critique our choice of medicine, our dosage and our method of consumption. What are you getting out of it? We certainly don't care about your ignorant opinions. I'd say the hostile behaviour is consequence of your condescending attitude. You resorted to name calling, so you own the "rudeness" aspect of the conversation.
BobCajun
Well-Known Member
I don't know, just saw an interesting looking post when I browsed the forums list I guess, then people kept replying so I replied back. If they stopped replying I would too. Now go take a hot bath. It'll make you feel better.
Dirty Hippie
Member
Not calling you a troll but that's the classic markings of a troll.
The Sad Truths of Internet Trolls:
Serious trolls are immune to criticism and logical arguments. True trolls cannot be reasoned with, regardless of how sound your logical argument is.
Serious trolls do not feel remorse like you and me. They have sociopathic tendencies, and accordingly, they delight in other people having hurt feelings.
Trolls, in general, consider themselves separate from the social order.
Trolls do not abide by etiquette or the rules of common courtesy.
Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
Trolls gain energy by you insulting them.
Trolls gain energy when you get angry.
The only way to deal with an online troll is to ignore him, or take away his ability to post online.
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
I can assure that is NOT part of he new program. Your Doctor is lying to you outright
CalyxCrusher
Well-Known Member
Dont mind Bob, he is indeed the resident troll, throw him on ignore, or under a bus. Its win win either way
Dirty Hippie
Member
I figured as much, thanks.
A.K.A. Overgrowem
Well-Known Member
Greetings neighbors of the great white north. As you can see the US. is busy morphing from an inept, corrupt, oligarchy, run by mafias under the guise of political parties, into an inept, corrupt, oligarchy, run by P.T. Barnum. As an aside, I'd like to invite ya'll to come on down this winter. It may be your last chance for a while as our police state masters will, no doubt, begin cheek swabs at the border, banning over 99% of Canadian RIU. members, I'm sure. Warm, sunny, FL. is happy to be your host, and since inflation has made vending machines bill friendly we don't even bitch about your coins anymore. That said, Health Canada fought tooth and nail to ban caretaker and patient mmj production. Now 1(?) year or so after being vanquished by Vick the Viper and a sage judge, they have capped mmj. by price and limited covered quantity, claiming pov....ah...er.. fiscal restraint. My question is. What was the game plan behind this whole, seemingly, Three Stooges planned/administered program?
Last edited:
OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
In other words, they're not even human.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
They are trying to...but it will backfire. Our feds have no jurisdiction over medical matters particularly in determining dosage without any factual studies to warrant such interference. The provincial colleges of physicians are a non-governmental, unelected body currently violating the Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms by intimidating doctors into following their guidelines rather that treating the concerns of the patient.
Cannabis will be available for legal recreational sales in 13 months, nation wide, so that kinda knocks the wind out of the sails of those trying to control dosage for patients. The whole point of this exercise, imo, is to reduce plant counts for patient gardens in order to try to stem 'leakage' into the legal (and taxed) market.
CarpeNocturnum
Well-Known Member
On behalf of a patient, same thing. Welcome here.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
the Canadian PATIENTS title might be a clue for you that it's a MEDICAL forum
BobCajun
Well-Known Member
Yeah I'm a mental patient so I qualify. An Ounce a day, wtf?
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
you said you weren't sick so how did you change....or did you lie?
you just don't get it....using 2 g of oil will put you OVER an OZ per day...it's not smoking. you just won't open your eyes and mind!
if you have a high g per day-you're not smoking it.
i know 2 people with over 200 g a day....do you think they're smoking it?? they're eating it!
do you know about extracts?
please learn something before you spout and judge. you spread false information but expected to be welcomed with open arms?
if you want to learn, welcome but if you want to argue, why not go someplace where that's welcome?....or are you truly a troll and just want to wind people up?
A.K.A. Overgrowem
Well-Known Member
After listening to the clowns arguing the "no home grow" case for Health Canada, I'm sure I could argue intraveinuos injection of dry pureed kief is a better option, and win.
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
Someone please correct me if Im wrong here but, wouldn't some stooge from HC contacting your Dr. to discuss dosage be a breach of Dr/Patient confidentiality?
torontomeds
Well-Known Member
I can see them calling to confirm, but "sway" that seems like a big time scandal
