OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
and you checked of course withb 100x scope..Yes, what's your point? I don't have broad mites so i don't know why you'd quote my post.
we are trying to help ..dude..we have seen this before..
and you checked of course withb 100x scope..Yes, what's your point? I don't have broad mites so i don't know why you'd quote my post.
I think its because tmv has not been found on mj?That nothing is wrong.
Nothing is "wrong" now except that cannatonic is acting "finicky" and I see things like a leaf that's not symmetrical or a few leaves with streaks in them or the cannatonics shoot leaves fold when I water too much or the main leaves slowly browning from the bottom up. Yields are 6-8oz per 5 gal bucket. Whatever it is it doesn't seem to "affect" all but one strain in the case of yields and if I baby her she produces records too.
I don't understand why people think that TMV can NOT have any affect on cannabis whatsoever.
I think its because tmv has not been found on mj?
and you checked of course withb 100x scope..
we are trying to help ..dude..we have seen this before..
Read the article. There is more than just TMV. And with the # of people who test plants I'm not surprised TMV hasn't been found but it looks like others have been found which act similarly.ok, that article says -not -sure if it really does infect cannabis-
now I am sure that if only one positive test was discovered, re tested and verified that there would no longer be ANY if ands or buts about this tmv right? even the best articles have not shown me a positive test for tmv, yet i have seen them for tobacco test results.
Science has not proven tmv infects cannabis, if they could they would? and then put an end to this I would think.
I couldnt help myself if I were you. I suspect if it actually is tmv that these scientists would be interested in their first case and probably certain protocols to make sure you dont infect another room full. clean well norby
send it in and be a first norby, maybe one of those labs will do it for you?Read the article. There is more than just TMV. And with the # of people who test plants I'm not surprised TMV hasn't been found but it looks like others have been found which act similarly.
the gloss doesn't matter.,if you tested them for mites then sure thing,,i missed about getting tested for russets/broadsThere is NO gloss to the leaves and yields are only reduced in ONE plant. Does that really sound like Broad mites and if so why are they so feared if they do hardly ANY damage? Do you think the 100x scope for a visual inspection at a testing lab would catch them? I've had at least 12 tests since this all started and no mites, no mold, no debris.
That is false .... >I think its because tmv has not been found on mj?
There it is!That is false .... >
you guys have No idea what you have done with this norby guy, He is NEVER wrong and will go to any length to prove it. get ready
the gloss doesn't matter.,if you tested them for mites then sure thing,,i missed about getting tested for russets/broads
..good one