Yes, but now you're just talking about the need to decrease barriers to entry for small business in general; I understand that legally it was not permitted to brew beer at home or distill at home. people still did it like they still grow without it being legal. On a more macroscopic level, these people develop valuable real skills that, when regulatory scenarios change sufficiently, they can generally capitalize upon. Certainly, you admit, that it is progress on the craft beer scene to now have legislation that legalizes the practice in every state. I'd say that even invoking your evidence actually hurts your argument since I would think you could call the new 50 state legality "progressive" in a technical sense. Thus, your argument becomes a temporal one: it will be a much longer time than you think before such craft industries will be able to fight the inevitable lobbying that you point out is inevitable at the front end. Big whoop. If you didn't realize that, you haven't been paying attention to the fact that 1% of americans controll 40% of the wealth. Naturally, in an economic situation like that, there will be a large uphill battle for small business to fight larger business since larger business is controlled by a concentration of wealth holders whose economic interests are likely more aligned than not when it comes to favorable regulatory structures. SO, yes, there will be much bullshit, but not enough to totally squelch out everyone. Big tobacco still deals with minor competitors taking tiny percentages of market share. ONce a competitor gets too big, they get bought out by the larger competitor whom they apparently threaten, right? Your distaste seems almost like you'd prefer to do nothing, or to keep things exactly as they are, which isn't great for the majority of the world.
be easy,