tikitoker
Active Member
Understandable. However in my experience if the plant is vigorous and environmental conditions are dialed in the demand of nutrients across the board will be in high need. Watering frequency and volume is also a factor in the ph and nutrient absorption. I understand that not all growers have funds to get automated equipment but we all preach optimal. Right?! So when in optimal conditions consistency is key to success. Consistency being the constant direct influence of the grower. If the water that feeds or just hydrates the soil does have an influence on the chemical and biological reaction within the soil. Urea has to be broken down, thus feeding more bacteria and lowering the ph. Along with consistency also is stability. And stability is what guarantees success. If my chemical/biological reaction is on the alkaline side 1. And will inevitably continue to do so( lets say in flower where a higher ph would be preferred for p and k), why on earth would you knowingly dose fertilizer with an alkaline base. That's add to the rise in ph and further depreciate the range in which micro nutrients and Nitrogen are available. Lack of or should I say lockout of Nitrogen will cause a magnesium deficiency and further slow growth. Thus in conclusion adjusting /stabilizing ph prior to administering is essential for success.tiki. I think the general consensus (at least from our side of the table) is that Ph adjusting your nutrient regime, or plain water, can actually do more harm than good. I think alot, depends on what your using to adjust ph. not talking soil ammendments here, just the water going in. It's better to let the soil adjust it, than to force it with things like potassium hydroxide, or soidum bisulfate, or even vinegar. It's just not neccessary. That's all we're trying to say here. nobody ever. aid ph is non-important. I feel like you knew that though.