Hillary can't be trusted

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love it when Republicans argue we dont need welfare because of charities, and then attack the head of a non-profit that does demonstrably good work.
Also I'm not affiliated with any party I actually wanted Obama to beat Romney. I don't like any party I don't even like Trump but he can't be as bad as Hillary he seems like a pretty reasonable man. He wants peace with Russia and so do I he wants us to work with Russia and Iran to defeat ISIS much like me we do not need to assassinate Assad he may not be a great man but he is nothing like Saddam. He even said he would talk to Kim the North Korean dictator sure he is crazy and the country is pretty fucked but we need to find some sort of peaceful resolution if at all possible.

Hillary is the complete opposite she even wants to let in refugees by the boatload the same refugees that are responsible for the weekly terrorist attacks in Europe.
 
Also I'm not affiliated with any party I actually wanted Obama to beat Romney. I don't like any party I don't even like Trump but he can't be as bad as Hillary he seems like a pretty reasonable man. He wants peace with Russia and so do I he wants us to work with Russia and Iran to defeat ISIS much like me we do not need to assassinate Assad he may not be a great man but he is nothing like Saddam. He even said he would talk to Kim the North Korean dictator sure he is crazy and the country is pretty fucked but we need to find some sort of peaceful resolution if at all possible.

Hillary is the complete opposite she even wants to let in refugees by the boatload the same refugees that are responsible for the weekly terrorist attacks in Europe.
Trump + "pretty reasonable"...

*Goes to check for snowball fights in Hell*
 
Hillary is the complete opposite she even wants to let in refugees by the boatload the same refugees that are responsible for the weekly terrorist attacks in Europe.

yeah, i've seen pics of all those refugees showing up in rafts that are loaded down with AK's, RPG's and IED"s. truly a sad sight.
 
What I don't understand is:

Why shouldn't we coordinate with russia to defeat isis? Isis is practically on their border and they have been fighting them for a while now.

Shouldn't we try to get as much information and cooperation as possible? At least until the region is stable?

If we do not communicate and remain standoffish, what will happen when our forces meet eachother?

We need to stop forcing regime change and start working with the governments in the region.
 
What I don't understand is:

Why shouldn't we coordinate with russia to defeat isis? Isis is practically on their border and they have been fighting them for a while now.

Shouldn't we try to get as much information and cooperation as possible? At least until the region is stable?

If we do not communicate and remain standoffish, what will happen when our forces meet eachother?

We need to stop forcing regime change and start working with the governments in the region.

China and Russia hate each other.
We are nothing more then China's tool.
 
We need to stop forcing regime change and start working with the governments in the region.

no, we need to pull out completely and let the governments over there fight there own battles.

that would be true if we wanted to truly help. but hte reality is that we want to protect our oil interests
 
and then attack the head of a non-profit that does demonstrably good work.

u mean like how Hillary used 15 cents of every dollar donated 2 hatia 2 rebuild her brothers infrastructure at the country's gold mine the Clinton's just happen 2 control ?


or maybe your talking about the cement plant Hillary built 500 miles away from the people and the people it employed r all connected 2 Haitian government ?

u don't watch 2 much global news I take it
 
u mean like how Hillary used 15 cents of every dollar donated 2 hatia 2 rebuild her brothers infrastructure at the country's gold mine the Clinton's just happen 2 control ?


or maybe your talking about the cement plant Hillary built 500 miles away from the people and the people it employed r all connected 2 Haitian government ?

u don't watch 2 much global news I take it
Or the soccer fields they made for people without safe water or sewage.
 
Last I read the Clinton Foundation has demonstrated very little above its 80+% administrative costs. Your trying to make the point about something else is quite a liberal leap.
You listened to Carly Fiorina (snicker). You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you on the nose. As usual, the right wing truthy sounds-true-but-isn't echo chamber stuff fed directly to ignoramuses like you has is exactly backwards. More than 80% is put to use, not spend on overhead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
CharityWatch, says that 88% of the foundation's money goes toward its charitable mission and gave the foundation an A rating for 2016.[9]

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.6 million in reported expenses.

More than 85% of everything donated to the Clinton Foundation goes towards good works. Wrong again Dave.
 
Just wondering what his views on it were.

Thats where your SS, cost of living increases are going.
The oil industry takes care of its own, and whoever has the most cash/demand.
Other Industries follow suite. China didn't decide to double it's population by accident.
The Oil Industry will not allow a production shut down to it largest costumer, with India in a close second things will get interesting once "we" and global warming open up the Arctic.

..and a lot of my views are based on the strain of the day.
 
You listened to Carly Fiorina (snicker). You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you on the nose. As usual, the right wing truthy sounds-true-but-isn't echo chamber stuff fed directly to ignoramuses like you has is exactly backwards. More than 80% is put to use, not spend on overhead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
CharityWatch, says that 88% of the foundation's money goes toward its charitable mission and gave the foundation an A rating for 2016.[9]

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.6 million in reported expenses.

More than 85% of everything donated to the Clinton Foundation goes towards good works. Wrong again Dave.


Do they provide a list of names of the accounts as to where the money went or just a list of account numbers it went into ? Having books in order and accounts completed get`s you a good rating, but proves nothing about where the cash went.
 
You listened to Carly Fiorina (snicker). You wouldn't recognize the truth if it bit you on the nose. As usual, the right wing truthy sounds-true-but-isn't echo chamber stuff fed directly to ignoramuses like you has is exactly backwards. More than 80% is put to use, not spend on overhead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation
CharityWatch, says that 88% of the foundation's money goes toward its charitable mission and gave the foundation an A rating for 2016.[9]

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/06/where-does-clinton-foundation-money-go/
We looked at the consolidated financial statements (see page 4) and calculated that in 2013, 88.3 percent of spending was designated as going toward program services — $196.6 million out of $222.6 million in reported expenses.

More than 85% of everything donated to the Clinton Foundation goes towards good works. Wrong again Dave.


See, they looked at the statements, Did they look into the actual received ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top