Hillary's Accomplishments and Qualifications for President.

sunny747

sunny747

Well-Known Member
I am on the fence as to who to vote for in the upcoming Presidential Election. I hear a lot of buzz about Hillary Clinton. Can you help me by listing a few of her political accomplishments, life experiences, beliefs, personal attributes or goals for the country?
I'd like to know why she, personally, is a good choice for president. Trashing other candidates is not evidence.
 
jugz420

jugz420

Well-Known Member
She quit her Job/spot remember? So in my opinion she is not a good candidate to be our chief and commander of this great POT nation!

-Jugz
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
If "knows how to play politics in DC" is a qualification, then she is at the top of her class there.
Click to expand...
i think we all prefer someone who is more inneffectual and doesn't know how to deliver on their promises.

anyhoo, also was secretary of state.

OP, you ever been secretary of state?
 
vostok

vostok

Well-Known Member

She showed great restraint, once it was discovered that
her husbands sperm was noticed on that other girls dress


ps besides why should you care less than 55% even vote anways
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i think we all prefer someone who is more inneffectual and doesn't know how to deliver on their promises.

anyhoo, also was secretary of state.

OP, you ever been secretary of state?
Click to expand...
Notice I'm not arguing against her being qualified, I think she's very qualified to play the game. I'm just not convinced that's such a good thing. Even though I didn't vote for Obama, I had hopes that he wasn't going to play the partisan game they play in DC, hoped he would close the revolving door between DC and Wallstreet and not play the game of influential lobbyists gaining positions on the admin team.

I don't have that same hope for any of the other candidates, especially Clinton. It's going to be meet the new boss, same as the old boss. It was naive of me to think Obama would be different, I can admit that, but it's better than people not being able to admit he's just been more of the same.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Notice I'm not arguing against her being qualified
Click to expand...
you liked a post earlier today of OP stating that we'd be better off with some random person off the street.

kinda contradicts what you are saying now and the tone of your previous post.

classic two face ginwilly.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you liked a post earlier today of OP stating that we'd be better off with some random person off the street.

kinda contradicts what you are saying now and the tone of your previous post.

classic two face ginwilly.
Click to expand...
You are assuming I see qualified to play the game in DC as a favorable quality. I honestly would rather see an outsider than a "insider". I'm not impressed with the way DC functions.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
vostok said:

She showed great restraint, once it was discovered that
her husbands sperm was noticed on that other girls dress

ps besides why should you care less than 55% even vote anways
Click to expand...

good job spamming that again, once wasn't enough.

anyhoo, she developed the state children's health insurance program as FLOTUS, which was a mjor fucking deal.

OP, did you ever end the problem of uninsured children in the united states of america?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You are assuming I see qualified to play the game in DC as a favorable quality. I honestly would rather see an outsider than a "insider". I'm not impressed with the way DC functions.
Click to expand...
yeah, much better that we elect someone ineffectual who will not be able to implement the agenda that the american people elect them based on.

go ahead and edit some more posts after the fact to try to mitigate your two-facedness.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
yeah, much better that we elect someone ineffectual who will not be able to implement the agenda that the american people elect them based on.

go ahead and edit some more posts after the fact to try to mitigate your two-facedness.
Click to expand...
You must not read well.

I said that was one of things I was optimistic about Obama was that he didn't have those "qualifications" of being an insider his whole life.

As far as implementing an agenda the american people vote them in for, you definitely have a higher opinion of the average voter than I do. I think the majority vote for who they like more than any other reason, the letter after the name is up there too. Most have no clue what the agenda of their favorite candidate is, late night TV makes a living off it during elections.
 
OddBall1st

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
For her entire life she was wrong about Gay marriage, but recently corrected herself. Did not throw out a cheating lying husband that sat on the throne while having his bishop polished....Survived sniper fire overseas,.... Applied for BUDs...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top