BendBrewer
Well-Known Member
And Rick Santorum is a GOP Presidential candidate.
yet you come back 10 minutes later.I'm outta here.........
I had begun to define my point, but the steam from that poor guy ears is clouding his monitor. If he really want to discuss the topic he needs to stop calling people names.You guys are really getting into this!
If ya'll can't agree to the definitions of the terms, neither of your arguments will address the other.
"I had begun to define my point, but the steam from that poor guy ears is clouding his monitor. If he really want to discuss the topic he needs to stop calling people names.
i thought he was the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is often the results of windsBLOWHARD's late night romps with pre-teen boy scouts.And Rick Santorum is a GOP Presidential candidate.
Welcome my 200 lb. gnat friend. I love your meaningless angle of argument. I would call them clever if they were.yet you come back 10 minutes later.
not getting enough attention and your religion forbids you from spanking the monkey?
i would get all uptight and start inane threads in that case, too.
mussolini was a righty.
That's what I was saying.Take away the Genocide and Nationalism and the Nazi agenda was quite Progressive. Have a gander at the Nazi policy initiatives during the 1930's.
All too true, the similarities seem quite strong on the surface.As long as you are in Wikipedia anyway, look up Fascism and see how similar it is to the Progressive agenda.
Why don't you explain to me what being leftwing means? Then explain to me what being a rightwing means. Then we can go from there."
You're funking funny. In a ridiculous kind of way.
- Hitler was a leftist"
mussolini was a righty just the same way hitler was a lefty and terrorists are religious.Mussolini was a righty?
In the American Political spectrum the farther right you go the less Government you have. So an extreme right dictatorship just can't exist. If you have a "right wing dictatorship" it has to be relative. It is to the right of what? Stalin that what. Jsut because your right of Stalin doesn't mean you hold the Values of Thomas Jefferson. But isn't Jefferson to the right of Stalin? Yup.That's what I was saying.
All too true, the similarities seem quite strong on the surface.
But be fair, Fascism requires blind devotion to a single person, which by definition is not progressive. The two are distinctly independent phenomena.
It is entirely possible for a fascist dictator to exercise rightist philosophies/agendas... but those rightist ideas would be similarly perverted as leftist philosophies/agendas are perverted by fascism.
The same logic can be applied to progressivism and fascism. A perfectly progressive fascist state would tear down a dictator (with so many taxes, oversights and obligations) rendering his powers useless... and thus there would be nothing fascist about the state.As I understand the Political spectrum the farther right you go the less Government you have. So am extreme right dictatorship just can't exist. If you have a "right wing dictatorship" it has to be relative. It is to the right of what? Stalin that what. Jsut because your right of Stalin doesn't mean you hold the Values of Thomas Jefferson. But isn't Jefferson to the right of Stalin? Yup.
It is not an exercise. The American Founders saw and philosophized ever aspect of economics and politics in this context. To say it was an just an exercise is to ignore the very words on the Declaration of Independence. Now if we are talking Geo-Politics things become relative to many things but mostly the King Of France.The same logic can be applied to progressivism and fascism. A perfectly progressive fascist state would tear down a dictator (with so many taxes, oversights and obligations) rendering his powers useless... and thus there would be nothing fascist about the state.
But to discuss left/right in such extremes is only an exercise, they don't exist in reality.
succinctness is lost on idiots and clowns.Great articulation of a very complicated subject!