HMM.... So there was no wiretapping going on really?

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
Still no evidence when I see some I'll be right there next to you denouncing it. However with this wiretapping stuff there's definitely something fishy going on now I didn't believe it before. However with what Nunez said today there might be something there.
Click to expand...
what nunes said today means that there was a warrant out on the top level members of the trump campaign.

do you think paul manafort played "a very limited role for a very limited time" in the trump campaign, cool2BUM?
 
cool2burn

cool2burn

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
what nunes said today means that there was a warrant out on the top level members of the trump campaign.

do you think paul manafort played "a very limited role for a very limited time" in the trump campaign, cool2BUM?
Click to expand...
I think Manaford's an idiot. But if he did anything wrong he should go to jail for sure. I do not think there was a warrant I think they use other means to get the signal intelligence then they unmasked the names without justification and widely spread it throughout the intelligence community that shit is shady
 
cool2burn

cool2burn

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
but did he play "a very limited role for a very limited time" in the trump campaign?

stop squirming and answer the simple question, you dimwitted bitch.
Click to expand...
I don't remember exactly which month he was removed but I think it was a good thing because honestly without Kellyanne I don't think Trump would be president. I don't think his role was limited , However if he really was colluding with the Russians I think we would've seen a lot more evidence by now. Especially seeming every bloody news agency was looking for evidence.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
I don't remember exactly which month he was removed but I think it was a good thing because honestly without Kellyanne I don't think Trump would be president. I don't think his role was limited , However if he really was colluding with the Russians I think we would've seen a lot more evidence by now. Especially seeming every bloody news agency was looking for evidence.
Click to expand...
oh, you mean the same paul manafort who was paid by the kremlin to run a highly documented disinformation campaign in ukraine for the benefit of putin? that manafort?

thanks for at least admitting trump sent spicer out there to lie about his own campaign manager who propelled him to victory in the republican primary and ran the entire show from march until august.

you're incredibly stupid. trump is tied closer to manafort and flynn and stone and sessions than nixon ever was to the watergate clowns. this is gonna be bad.
 
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
has anyone told manafort or flynn or sessions or stone or page that those who roll over first will get the comfiest prison cells?
Click to expand...
I guarantee Democrats and disgruntled Republicans will offer immunity to whoever talks.

That's way better than a potential treason charge, by many many times.

Tell a few truths, take whatever dirty money you got and move to the Bahamas.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
SneekyNinja said:
I guarantee Democrats and disgruntled Republicans will offer immunity to whoever talks.

That's way better than a potential treason charge, by many many times.
Click to expand...
well, in the last half hour, nunes' democratic counterpart on the house intelligence committee, adam schiff, just stated that "there is more than circumstantial evidence now" of direct collusion between trump and russia.

before now, it was just "circumstantial" evidence.

i'm guessing that the "incidental monitoring" that nunes ran to trump about this morning means something along the lines of "they wiretapped putin and incidentally picked up trump".

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top