Hmmm. Your thoughts?

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
So an appointee of Trump should determines Trumps guilt...that must be Right wing logic?
As far as I know, the AG is always appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. So you have a special council appointed when there is a conflict of interest.
 

MidwestGorilla219

Well-Known Member
"main stream media"?.....but not fox?....lol your red is showing.
Fox is apart of the main stream media. What part of they (the MSM) convinced a bunch of righties Hillary was going down did you not understand? It's like im dealing with a bunch of fucking kids in here.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
As far as I know, the AG is always appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. So you have a special council appointed when there is a conflict of interest.
And Mueller's charge was to complete the investigation and he is known as a man who does what he sets out too...so why did he stop at saying he could not exonerate the POTUS, someone made him stand down or took that away and the Trump appointed DOJ knew for three weeks that was the case
And the DOJ's actions make Republicans look crooked again to Americans
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
And Mueller's charge was to complete the investigation and he is known as a man who does what he sets out too...so why did he stop at saying he could not exonerate the POTUS, someone made him stand down or took that away and the Trump appointed DOJ knew for three weeks that was the case
And the DOJ's actions make Republicans look crooked again to Americans
Or mueller knows that a sitting president cannot be indicted under current DOJ policy. This may have been his way of passing evidence to Congress. But he seemed pretty clear on the Russia collusion, making obstruction of the collusion case a who cares.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Or mueller knows that a sitting president cannot be indicted under current DOJ policy. This may have been his way of passing evidence to Congress. But he seemed pretty clear on the Russia collusion, making obstruction of the collusion case a who cares.
Yes, yes, we all knew (or the most of us) that Trump wasn't going to be indicted, charged or removed from office over this.

What Barr did say was "did not establish" conspiracy between T's campaign and Russian agents. So, oh yes, there is evidence. "No evidence" is different from that. Barr's summary is damning, says there is evidence and is not a vindication at all. I think the people of this country should be able to see the full report and evidence themselves. At least, as much as possible without affecting other investigations. This is our right, not something to be debated.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Fox is apart of the main stream media. What part of they (the MSM) convinced a bunch of righties Hillary was going down did you not understand? It's like im dealing with a bunch of fucking kids in here.
Fox is notorious about reporting fake stories and not correcting themselves when proven wrong. Other than that, agree that they are no more biased to the right than CNN or Huffington Post are on the left. The difference is, those sites try to report the facts and will reverse themselves if the get it wrong. But yes, their bias gets in the way of being a reliable source for information.

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/

 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
For you pea-brains complaining about the left-wing media, just don't listen to them! Observe for yourself what is happening! Anyone can see just by the facial expression of quotes by people, and then what the WH is saying in their pressers. Usually what the WH says is complete bullshit, but this time they are saying that everyone is celebrating, and partying with champagne, etc.

The only people who react in a celebratory manner to a memo that THEY wrote, are guilty people. They are putting on a show like OJ did. If they never had a concern about being called guilty, then they would just go about their business.

Forrest Trump is a traitor, and treason will be the legacy of his administration.


:mrgreen:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes, yes, we all knew (or the most of us) that Trump wasn't going to be indicted, charged or removed from office over this.

What Barr did say was "did not establish" conspiracy between T's campaign and Russian agents. So, oh yes, there is evidence. "No evidence" is different from that. Barr's summary is damning, says there is evidence and is not a vindication at all. I think the people of this country should be able to see the full report and evidence themselves. At least, as much as possible without affecting other investigations. This is our right, not something to be debated.
Barr only said no collusion with the Russian government

He couldn’t say trump didn’t conspire with Russian agents because it’s already been proven in court that he did
 

medviper

Well-Known Member
For you pea-brains complaining about the left-wing media, just don't listen to them! Observe for yourself what is happening! Anyone can see just by the facial expression of quotes by people, and then what the WH is saying in their pressers. Usually what the WH says is complete bullshit, but this time they are saying that everyone is celebrating, and partying with champagne, etc.

The only people who react in a celebratory manner to a memo that THEY wrote, are guilty people. They are putting on a show like OJ did. If they never had a concern about being called guilty, then they would just go about their business.

Forrest Trump is a traitor, and treason will be the legacy of his administration.


:mrgreen:
why let facts, nuance & objectivity get in the way of a weak minded delusional fallacy?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
just like the renewed phony effort to strip away americans healthcare again, trump hopes that'll divert public attention away from congress's effort to access the complete an hopefully unredacted mueller report...

Like when Bill Clinton bombed "rebels" in Europe to take the focus off Monica Lewinsky's sticky lips?


 
Top