Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
since bucky is apparently incapable of making sense this week, perhaps you can explain how Hobby Lobby "profits" from birth control?
and to follow up, explain what the fuck you were saying up there cuz it was nonsensical
Hobby Lobby Decision..
- Thread starter schuylaar
- Start date
and to follow up, explain what the fuck you were saying up there cuz it was nonsensical
Ra$p0tin
Well-Known Member
Since he will not, let me sum it up.
He thinks the owners of Hobby Lobby are hypocrites based of their christian faith because they won their case with the ACA through SCOTUS, while owning investments which includes pharmaceutical companies who also manufacture abortion drugs.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
What I find amusing is that somehow all the atheists here cannot understand that religious people are allowed to be COMPLETELY HYPOCRITICAL when following their faiths. There is no standard in the law that grants exceptions to the freedom of religion.
nitro harley
Well-Known Member
Sky..old meme nitro, please find new.
thank you,
"the management"
bucky and schuylaar
I thought it was appropriate to post a crying baby at this time. I think the Dems should kill as many babies of theirs as they possibly can as quick as they can for free. And I would make sure that they get the best shit available and as much as they want so if they wanted to double up on the pills it would be there for them.
greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
No matter the choice, just make sure she uses at least SOME KIND of birth control.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
The genius behind the Meaningful Use meaures used by our gov requires this for reimbursement.They really have no clue, no surprise Buck would pick up on it. Also, all patients must be asked if they are hispanic or non-hispanic. If you don't document that you asked the middle-eastern or Asian if they are hispanic or not, you lose reimbursement. Yay government healthcare idiots.fucking dolt.
"BMI" doesnt mean shit
The Rock:
6 foot 5
260 lbs
BMI 30.8 which is Morbidly Obese.
greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
"the management"
bucky and schuylaar
That's some funny shit right there, neither of you manages to do much because you are HERE constantly...LMFAO
greenlikemoney
Well-Known Member
Because the owners of Hobby Lobby probably do their own investing, right Uncle Skittles? Goes to show you Skittles knows nothing about managing large sums of money, except the $2500 ( supposedly $2300 now ) his WIFE OWES HIM. To be honest, without his wife Uncle Skittles would be living in his make-believe Dads basement.
sheskunk
Well-Known Member
Neither one of them even have a job.
AlecTheGardener
Well-Known Member
You are a female?I guess you've never heard of a prostate exam.
As a woman, I kind of enjoy being poked and prodded. If it's done right.
It changes so much now.
Sad you don't get a women's struggle..pregnant, barefoot and in the kitchen is a concept that shall never be again..
I've been female and that never changed unlike shecunt
tightpockt
Well-Known Member
I wonder how this would have gone down if the owners were Muslim and refused to cover medications or procedures derived from pigs.
Or...
what if the owners were Scientologist and they refused to cover antidepressants
Or...
what if they were Christian Scientists and refused to offer any health care at all.
Or...
what if the owners were Scientologist and they refused to cover antidepressants
Or...
what if they were Christian Scientists and refused to offer any health care at all.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
My kind of girl!I guess you've never heard of a prostate exam.
As a woman, I kind of enjoy being poked and prodded. If it's done right.
AlecTheGardener
Well-Known Member
My question was directed at skunk.
As to why, I am just confused.
Makes no difference, just my own confusion.
AlecTheGardener
Well-Known Member
I have a feeling the Christian Scientists would lose their case quickly.
Maybe not, I really want to see a case like that! How would it turnout?
Now allowing access is a violation of law, but it directly violates their religious rights.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Based on RFRA, you can make a pretty good prediction of how those hypothetical cases would resolve. I will leave it as an exercise to the progs to ACTUALLY READ THE LAW and form an opinion. Skylard and LondonFrog are excused from this exercise for obvious reasons.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
When has not paying for my healthcare meant denying me access to healthcare? When it's politically prudent to say it does?
Doer
Well-Known Member
What people don't understand is we primarily vote with our feet in business. We patronize those we feel comfortable with. We work for what makes sense to us.
If you have a Company of those affiliations and limited views, the only question is if they can be successful in keeping workers.
And the red herring is that this is about women's rights, or birth control. It was an attack on religion by the govt, that failed. You therefore make religion stronger, by definition.
And the lies about it just make that part worse.
And how many companies do you know that are successful and Scientology. besides Actors?
What Christian Science Org and their heath plans are you even familiar with?
This is the rule of Law. No more, no less. "What if," is not even relevant. We will deal with that based on reality, not your handwaving partisanship. It is a uniquely Independent Supreme Court. Love it or hate it. It doesn't matter.
Thus Spake SCOTUS.
Also, it is a far, far stretch to say investment in publicly traded pharma companies is meaningful.
It is also hypocritical of Buck to say he is not a hypocrite.
We all are. It is why we have Law.
But, you are free to spout the talking points as if you thought it up. That is Politics, not Law.