How many lawyers does it take to define "dried"?

TheMan13

Well-Known Member
The problem is that these parasites have parsed words for cash for the past seven years at an extreme expense to our society. They do so to refuse acknowledgement that Section 4 is being exploited by the machine it was clearly written to provide protection from. The language therein is clearly "a charter of negative liberties", as is our federal Bill of Rights. It was not written to be read as what a patient cannot do (aka posses more than 2.5 oz/12 plants per patient), but rather what the machine cannot do to a patient: "shall not be subject to arrest, prosecution, or penalty in any manner". The affirmative defense of Section 8 (positive liberty) clearly provides for an "uninterrupted supply" that has no relation to the 2.5 oz/12 plants per patient they like to reference/exploit in Section 4. Personally I read the limits of Section 4 to reasonably refer to public transportation or transfer of. How many years and millions of dollars will be necessary to get to that just argument when these profitable dog and pony shows continue to jam up the dockets?
 
Last edited:
Top