That's the whole issue in a nutshell - different chemicals in the nutes are taken up at different rates so adding RO/water dilutes the mixture but maintains ratios whereas adding nutes, even diluted 4:1 as Bugbee does, will replenish the rapidly depleted chemicals but will tend to build up the amounts of the chemicals that are taken up slowly. Eventually, that imbalance will cause nutrient deficiency or nutrient toxicity.
Conventional wisdom seems to be split on between topping off with water only vs topping off with nutes and, being somewhat (cough, cough) of a helicopter plant daddy my take was to have things at "optimum" levels so I was adding back nutes to get to the previous level of TDS. The road to hell is paved with best intentions and, in this case, what seemed optimal to me was not optimal to the plants.
When I read the Bugbee research, I built a little "model", as shown below. I'm sure it's quite inaccurate* but it helped me understand that even if the TDS of the res drops "a lot", there's still
plenty of nutes to keep the plants at the "sufficient" nutrient level.
View attachment 5217918
View attachment 5217919
The big win for me was that comments at the bottom of the CannaStats page. My res holds 28 gallons of nutes and it's in a 2' x 4' tent so I'm right in the ballpark of 3 gallons per square foot. And, per the graphic, I did have a drop of ≈ 25% in the res. Adding back just RO works fine for me and swapping the res at about 25% down or every 2 weeks is a big labor saver for me (two plants in a res that holds 28 gallons of nutes).
*I realize that it deals with elemental PPM not TDS in the res but I did help illustrate what types of changes were going on in the res. I'd love to see actual data but the cost/benefit isn't there for me.