ttystikk
Well-Known Member
If you have a point, make it.right, lame spin...
See my sig. It is verbatim and in full context.
If you have a point, make it.right, lame spin...
See my sig. It is verbatim and in full context.
the quotes he pulled were to nlxsk and bignbushy, who are not even people.Buck does it to poor people who vote against their own interest. Goat fucker did it to me because he had no other argument, and figured his financial success would speak for itself. Kind of like trump, oops.
But you mock people for being poor.the quotes he pulled were to nlxsk and bignbushy, who are not even people.
so he is wrong when he says i mock people for being poor.
nlxsk and bignbushy are NOT people.But you mock people for being poor.
You are a lie.
no they are not, just racist scumbags. definitely not people.
Ahhh, so now you take it upon yourself to decide who is legitimate people and who isn't?no they are not, just racist scumbags. definitely not people.
yep.Ahhh, so now you take it upon yourself to decide who is legitimate people and who isn't?
You're a liar and worse, a judgementalist liar.yep.
i shouldn't be judgmental of racists who call obama a "halfrican", a "kenyan muslim" and a "mulatto" with "purple lips"?You're a liar and worse, a judgementalist liar.
Keep pulling shit out of your ass.i shouldn't be judgmental of racists who call obama a "halfrican", a "kenyan muslim" and a "mulatto" with "purple lips"?
Just more lies.i shouldn't be judgmental of racists who call obama a "halfrican", a "kenyan muslim" and a "mulatto" with "purple lips"?
how are these people unrelated to the conversation when it was them who made the racist remarks that we are now discussing?Keep pulling shit out of your ass.
You know I said none of those things. You also know you have no defense against my assertions.
So bring unrelated people into the conversation in the vain hope that such drivel will save you.
That's the best part. This small vocal minority of people like Buck who stand in the way of progress truly believe they're in the majority of Democrats. They delude themselves with legitimate belief in Senators like Joe Manchin, Dianne Feinstein, and Clair McCaskill.. Their reasons are as unfounded as their convictions. They support establishment politicians because we oppose them, and they oppose us, because they truly believe Sanders supporters are responsible for Clinton losing the election, despite the facts they can't address.They're too busy 'winning' to think about how they sound to anyone else but their own echo chamber.
Too busy dividing.
Meanwhile, the Progressive Movement is coalescing around a core set of values.
Without them.
You already made your point, see my sig.If you have a point, make it.
That's the best part. This small vocal minority of people like Buck who stand in the way of progress truly believe they're in the majority of Democrats. They delude themselves with legitimate belief in Senators like Joe Manchin, Dianne Feinstein, and Clair McCaskill.. Their reasons are as unfounded as their convictions. They support establishment politicians because we oppose them, and they oppose us, because they truly believe Sanders supporters are responsible for Clinton losing the election, despite the facts they can't address.
It's obvious to me both factions can't unite, as progressives believe campaign finance reform is the top priority because it affects all other issues. Establishment Democrats believe we have to court big donors to remain competitive, yet they all refuse to address the fact that this strategy ostracizes small donors, aka. constituents. Republicans, as well as their constituents, do not have a problem taking enormous amounts of cash from big donors, on the contrary, they actually SUPPORT it! So tell me, how will the Democratic alternative win the election by having to claim, to his constituents, and cast some unbinding vote towards it, that he doesn't really support the way the system works.. but hey, he has to work within it to be competitive, right? He ends up getting less money from big donors than Republicans, & ostracizing the progressive wing of his base... How in the hell do these people believe that is a winning strategy?
Look at my sig. Why would any of these conservatives people like our good buddy, ol' Justin-Case, is trying to recruit because he believes conservatives are more reasonable than progressives, vote for the Democratic option over the Republican?
i'm sure black people getting killed by the police have it as their number one issue as well.campaign finance reform is the top priority because it affects all other issues.
I'm not even Jewish/Muslim but kosher or halal meats are prepared with alot more care than regular, I always go for it if its an option...just something to consider.Fixed that for you.
When it comes to Orthodox Jews, it's 98%.
Oh, I see, so you're only "progressive" when it suits your own interests, kinda like Clinton... You have conditions..Buck does it to poor people who vote against their own interest.
Are you calling black people ignorant?i'm sure black people getting killed by the police have it as their number one issue as well.