Neither led cmh or hos are the future of the agri business, we are on the verge of making other tech work much better but as yet it hasnt become cost effective or safe. Leds and cmh are merely the present.
Buds are the sum of the grow, very little changes in a week or two.
Wow. What a fucking douche. Actually expecting to provide evidence of all the bullshit being spouted. Oh no!
I don't agree with that. Grown enough bud to see things turn around completely in a week or two.
Hahhahahahaha!!!Its there on google now, i just checked for you....
Go type 'green light chlorophyll' on google now and scroll through the first twenty pages reading anything on wiley or ncbi or any cited site that scientists use to cite experiments and results type stuff.
Hurry over to google before it dissapears and gives you broscience led manufacturer results
Lol the one growing spinach or the one growing sunflowers?Its there on google now, i just checked for you....
Go type 'green light chlorophyll' on google now and scroll through the first twenty pages reading anything on wiley or ncbi or any cited site that scientists use to cite experiments and results type stuff.
Hurry over to google before it dissapears and gives you broscience led manufacturer results
I suppose its the same with Colours. Different species of animals see colour spectrum differently.Know what i find interesting here though....
Not siding with either side. But just some statistics.
Upon a google search, and according to the University of Tennessee the sunlight at the Earth's atmosphere is 1366watts / m2.
Is comprised of 50% infrared light, 40% visible light, and 10% UV.
Wouldnt the golden standard to attempt to achieve be sunlight?
After all, plants have evolved to grow optimally under the sun.
Why wouldnt plants adapt to use infrared as well?
Just because they can't "see it" to photosynthesize, doesn't necessarily mean they havn't evolved to take advantage of it somehow...
We are always attempting to replicate the suns energy. Its the golden standard.
Why wouldn't infrared be important here?
Its all part of environment isn't it?
Its interesting isn't it. Just makes me think about.
I have a camera in my grow room that has IR for night vision but the spectrum is 940nm and so it doesn't disturb flowering. It didn't seem to bother the growth last round, but what you say is interesting.
Its a very mixed debate isn't it.
Anyways guess I will find out for myself room temps are 85 right now and will flip to 12/12 in a week, then 10 weeks for these two sativa strains. That puts me into the end of Sept with hopefully cooler night temps (day time for the plants) for the last few weeks.Buds are the sum of the grow, very little changes in a week or two.
His advice on light and heat with led and hps is solid though, nothing that im not sating
No. I'm citing the personal experiences of dozens, even hundreds of growers. If LED wasn't more efficient, word would have gotten around.
RIU occasionally miss quotes the wrong author.
Where was the original quote? That was straight out of left field...
Interesting. Why are they saying that?
Hey man, where have you been?