Looks to me like the pissing contest is over. Last week I pm'ed a bunch of those people from eariler in the thread letting them know my pics were up, as you can see, none of them have anything to say anymore. They thought I was trying to sell them light bulbs, I wasn't. I'm not in the lighting business, never was. They just didn't want to believe it.Seems interesting, thanks for the information but it has turned into a pissing contest.
you PM'd me and i never thought you were in the light bulb business.Looks to me like the pissing contest is over. Last week I pm'ed a bunch of those people from eariler in the thread letting them know my pics were up, as you can see, none of them have anything to say anymore. They thought I was trying to sell them light bulbs, I wasn't. I'm not in the lighting business, never was. They just didn't want to believe it.
you PM'd me and i never thought you were in the light bulb business.
is your claim that the pics you provide prove that ceramic MH bulbs beats the rest?
i try to stay open-minded but you do realize that people grow with higher wattages and use HPS and don't fry their plants. as far as i can tell it is just another bulb in our arsenal and certainly not better than HPS (one grow can't even tell if it is just as good as HPS - let alone better). if you want to make it your favorite, sounds good to me. heck - i'm thinking on giving CFLs a try to see how they do.You're right, you never made any comments suggesting anything like that. But you did post a few comments that showed you were open minded and maybe wanted to know more. It was out of respect that I PM'ed you. There were a few people that were interested, or wanted see first hand info, I pm'ed them too. You suggested that I do a grow report, I did, just not here at RUI.
Yes, my pics are proof that it's better then HPS. I'm still waiting to see 400 watts HPS in 8 square feet without an air cooled hood or a cool tube 6 inches off of the canopy....... once we get to that point, we'll start comparing. I put a HPS bulb in my set up....for about 10 minutes when it got up to 98 degrees and was still climbing, I put my CMH blub back in. I tried it again a few days later with the hood raised all the way up, still to hot, it was at 96 degrees.
So yes, those pics are my proof and you do see a comparision, maybe not what people were looking for but, My CMH bulb is doing something MAJOR that a 400 watt HPS bulb can't.....grow weed in my cabinet at a tempature that doesn't fry the plants.
i try to stay open-minded but you do realize that people grow with higher wattages and use HPS and don't fry their plants. as far as i can tell it is just another bulb in our arsenal and certainly not better than HPS (one grow can't even tell if it is just as good as HPS - let alone better). if you want to make it your favorite, sounds good to me. heck - i'm thinking on giving CFLs a try to see how they do.
Ed Rosenthal would really piss you off - he says MH is a waste of money - just use HPS!
Absolutely and completely agree. Part of being an expert means being wrong sometimes - can't avoid it (and shouldn't want to)! I think we will be seeing LEDs (or some form of them) in our future.Henery Ford said all cars will only ever run on gasoline.....then diesel engines came out, now electric, solar, hybrids......
The most knowledgable people in the world at one point thought the world was flat....they turned out to be wrong.
Old Ed, has smoked, grown and seen more weed then I could ever imagine, but that doesn't mean he knows it all either....
I'm certainly not going to knock his knowledge but everyone has thoughts and opinions on what's best, they only last so long because they only look at what is in front of them. Light bulbs, like everything else, keep changing. The more we buy, the more companies dump into R&D.
I haven't seen much success from LEDs but, I'll bet that's where things end up (or some variation of an LED/plasma type of bulb)
Evloution happens. Whatever is made today, there will be someone tomorrow improving on it. It's Ed's time now, later on someone else will come out and say where he has been wrong. Then they will be the top dog until the next person comes along.
LOL, I'll just leave it and be wrong. I'm okay with that. So I'm guessing you, like myself, spend some time stoned watching the History or Discovery channel.Absolutely and completely agree. Part of being an expert means being wrong sometimes - can't avoid it (and shouldn't want to)! I think we will be seeing LEDs (or some form of them) in our future.
I would mention only one small, insignificant quibble. And I only point this out because you are a good sport and I believe you'll understand that I mention it with kind intentions. The flat-earth thing - not very many knowledgeable people ever bought into that. I understand you completely and using it as analogy did not undermine your argument at all. But you may find it interesting that not many folks bought into the flat earth (or at least anyone who thought about it at all). Any culture that lived near a seashore figured the Earth was round (or at least curved) since they saw the hull disappear and then the masts as ships sailed towards the horizon. A flat Earth would mean the ship would disappear all at once. Heck - the ancient Greeks had the circumference of the Earth figured out pretty close. They were off since they didn't know the Earth bulged. More proof of a round Earth available to the ancients was the circular shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse (which happen 2 and sometimes 3 times a year).
I would humbly recommend replacing flat-earth with earth-centered solar system and you'll have a great and accurate analogy.
Again, please do not take this personal - i am just passing along some info that i've gathered and thought you might enjoy it. I realize it is very trite and has no bearing on our discussion.