This evening I will check into the Rand Paul claims, I have a feeling they just as speculative as Ron Paul claims or it would have been cited already. I didn't realize how bad liberals hate libertarians, it's all over the net but I didn't take notice before. It's cult like.
Just going to bump this, since Ron Paul is such good friends with former KKK grand wizard Don Black.Plenty of evidence.
Here is the photo again of Ron Paul with his friend and supporter, the former KKK grand wizard Don Black:
Doesn't look photo shopped to me.
Also, as evidence that the professional politician (who ran a racist newsletter and opposed the civil rights act) knew the former KKK grand wizard, here is a NYTimes article which claims that he was implicated by a lawyer in a trial in which the former kkk grand wizard was a defendant.
http://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/14/us/judge-denies-connally-subpoena-in-trial-of-3-alleged-mercenaries.html
Court trials are a matter of public record and I doubt that such a periodical as the New York Times would fabricate such a claim. In case you're dumber than I thought, just because the judge rejected the subpoena does not mean that a professional politician who runs a racist newsletter would not have been aware that he was implicated.
Laughing at a lack of evidence that he knew who Don Black is the same as calling him stupid, and I don't think he is stupid.
Then there is the fact that Don Black made a campaign contribution and Ron Paul publicly refused to give it back.
The article itself says "The Federal authorities said today that John Connally, former Governor of Texas, and Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, had no connection with a plot to overthrow the government of a Caribbean island."
That was after they were implicated by the defense attorney.
Wow looks at the little propagandists go, that socialism is coming out in you.
That both authorities and the judge said he had nothing to do with it, NO CONNECTIONS WHAT SO EVER, yes we know this. I swear you sound just like UB right now, repeating loose phrases with no substance in hopes someone will believe it.
No connection except for the fact that he was implicated by the defense lawyer.
I have a picture taken with Bill Clinton when I visited Washington for an agricultural summit.
Did Ron Paul ever take a photo with Senator Robert Byrd?
I don't know, but I do know that Ron Paul ran a racist newsletter.
Were you implicated by a defense attorney in the Lewinsky debacle?
Well then prove it, I have yet to see ANY evidence he had ever seen the man in his life. Hence why no one is publishing this shit except proleft radical websites and even they have nothing. You posting speculation every post isn't helping your case any. It's a smear tactic plain and simple progressive liberals, socialist, and commies fucking hate libertarians with a passion and been in attack mode for the last 5 years. Planting picketers, broadcasting speculation as news, we have all fucking seen it so denying it makes you one delusion ass person. I know you want this country to become some radical communist state where the lazy get compensated for nothing, but it's never going to happen. So dream on commie, dream the fuck on. Why the fuck did you stop in Mexico, China is where you need to be practicing what you preach.
No it doesn't, it's highly successful. It takes a smear and makes it nuclear. Liberals have been successful at making hundreds of "media" sites that are no more than blog posts copying and pasting each others stories. Don't think so? Do a Google search of Ron Paul racist, white supremacist you will get tons of media names no one has heard before of left-wing extremist news sites that aren't anything more than blogs all post the same fucking story verbatim all linking back to each other as sources. It's fucking pathetic.
Idiot.
Implicated is just saying name which is what they did. You can do anything illegal and say for example "Obama" knew what I was doing and he is implicated unless afterwards you have no fucking evidence like in this case that judge will laugh at the defense as he did in this case. Fucking propagandist.
IMO, as an outsider looking in, it does bode well for Paul. Anyone that does a little research will come to the same realisation you have (the bolded) and the smear campaigns, the bullshit racial garbage is part and parcel of left wing libtard prattle that has become so transparent... I honestly think they crap on about that white supremacist bullshit to ensure people never forget the KKK is the democrats lasting legacy to Americans... It actually makes their transparent and baseless talking points all the more pathetic...
Here is the pic again of Ron Paul hanging out with his friend and supporter, former KKK grand wizard Don Black, just so you can see it, in case you didn't look.Plenty of evidence.
Here is the photo again of Ron Paul with his friend and supporter, the former KKK grand wizard Don Black:
Doesn't look photo shopped to me.
Also, as evidence that the professional politician (who ran a racist newsletter and opposed the civil rights act) knew the former KKK grand wizard, here is a NYTimes article which claims that he was implicated by a lawyer in a trial in which the former kkk grand wizard was a defendant.
http://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/14/us/judge-denies-connally-subpoena-in-trial-of-3-alleged-mercenaries.html
Court trials are a matter of public record and I doubt that such a periodical as the New York Times would fabricate such a claim. In case you're dumber than I thought, just because the judge rejected the subpoena does not mean that a professional politician who runs a racist newsletter would not have been aware that he was implicated.
Laughing at a lack of evidence that he knew who Don Black is the same as calling him stupid, and I don't think he is stupid.
Then there is the fact that Don Black made a campaign contribution and Ron Paul publicly refused to give it back.
So being falsely implicated in a lawsuit makes rp his "buddy" ? How can you make that much of a leap? This is propaganda.. look at the actual evidence you have... paul was implicated and found to be completely uninvolved. He received a donation and snapped a picture with a white supremecist. To you, that is factual evidence that he is a racist, or even that he is close friends with this person? If so I hope you're never on a jury.