I just can't

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
Make the lie simple, like an infographic quoting something hitler never said.

Also, those "air bubbles" in the video all travel in different directions, they would all move at the same angle if it were filmed underwater.
All I see is bubbles moving around everywhere under the water in this vid..

Not to mention they use anti bubble tech, to help mitigate the amount of bubbles and their directions.. nice try, lol!
 

HydroKid239

Well-Known Member

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
I heard the cartels stick migrant kids in dead coyote skin suits, all packed and strapped up with fentynal/etc, and make them lope 4 legged across the border.. The coyote population (both fake and real) is getting pretty dense, due to the fact they quit shooting at them near the border because so many are actually little kids.
 

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
You can't even fly a drone over Antarctica where it's too extreme for batteries to work, so no.. we're not allowed to document it. We can't even put a HD camera on the moon, or point one at the lunar landing site when the artemis flew within 70 miles right over it, but... we can see mars in 4k, where drone batteries work great? :lol:
 

Hollatchaboy

Well-Known Member
What's on the moon to see in HD? Mars has potential life. I get the need to be able to see images in HD, from Mars. The moon is devoid of life. Just a bunch of rock and dirt. You can pretty much see all that through a telescope.
 

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
1681777186955.png

Your telling me that simply flying in a little solar powered HD cam that's 1000 times better, that could point towards the earth like this pretty much 24/7 is too far fetched, and pointless? Kinda like the original tapes they lost, that weren't important? You would rather they spend billions of your tax dollars building "satellites" that show you CGI, and believe only that? lol

They've had more than 20-30 years to do it afaic. Its too easy to deep fake anything at this point though, so have fun believing the new fake moon base sites too. lol
 

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
What's on the moon to see in HD? Mars has potential life. I get the need to be able to see images in HD, from Mars. The moon is devoid of life. Just a bunch of rock and dirt. You can pretty much see all that through a telescope.
The most powerful telescopes on earth can't see the flag, rover tracks, the plaque, or any evidence of a lunar landing site btw. Tell me again how you can see everything through a scope? :D
 

Drop That Sound

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't the most important scientific data for new moon bases be the shape that the landing site is in? We study the pyramids, ruins, and even mars surface FFS, but don't wanna know how the rover or flag is holding up after decades of being on the moon, to see how the new base should be built? Haha, I just..
 

Hollatchaboy

Well-Known Member
View attachment 5282581

Your telling me that simply flying in a little solar powered HD cam that's 1000 times better, that could point towards the earth like this pretty much 24/7 is too far fetched, and pointless? Kinda like the original tapes they lost, that weren't important? You would rather they spend billions of your tax dollars building "satellites" that show you CGI, and believe only that? lol

They've had more than 20-30 years to do it afaic. Its too easy to deep fake anything at this point though, so have fun believing the new fake moon base sites too. lol
Not too far fetched, but yea, kinda pointless. Why would I need HD images of the earth? I know what it looks like. I see it every day.
 
Top