i think i might be quitting

Status
Not open for further replies.
++ rep, good catch
That was an odd exchange.

"I wish you were fighting for the good team."
"I am."
"Wow, I can't believe you would ever side with a team. Teams r like holy warz!"
"That's hypocritical, and mildly retarded."
"I have to go now. Goodbye."
Can I hire you to write all my summations? When I see that type of contradiction it puzzles me. How do you get through to someone who can't seem to understand what they are writing?
 
That was an odd exchange.

"I wish you were fighting for the good team."
"I am."
"Wow, I can't believe you would ever side with a team. Teams r like holy warz!"
"That's hypocritical, and mildly retarded."
"I have to go now. Goodbye."

One of the best predictors of a collision is constant bearing. So if I'm on you constantly, get your head out of the cockpit!

Oh wait.

upload_2016-5-25_10-55-25.png
 
Never had to face peer review where you got a new asshole drilled on the regular in front of everyone. After awhile you stop caring. So much more civilized to do it in writing.
Your peer reviews would bring up personal issues to discredit you? That does not sound scientific to me. More like politics.
It seems uncaring and callous to intentionally try to shame someone on personal matters in scientific debate.
You don't have to respond I know what's coming: "Shut up you pussy"
 
Your peer reviews would bring up personal issues to discredit you? That does not sound scientific to me. More like politics.
It seems uncaring and callous to intentionally try to shame someone on personal matters in scientific debate.
You don't have to respond I know what's coming: "Shut up you pussy"
Depends on the situation. This is common practice in things like Ranger School, where you have to rely on your buddies, left and right. It also is a way to weed out bullshitters in scientific debate.
 
Depends on the situation. This is common practice in things like Ranger School, where you have to rely on your buddies, left and right. It also is a way to weed out bullshitters in scientific debate.
Just so. We're here to test ideas to destruction, then keep the survivors. Only way to improve the breed.
Many folks take that personally, and there is no need to do that. It gets in the way of productive discussion.
 
Your peer reviews would bring up personal issues to discredit you? That does not sound scientific to me. More like politics.
It seems uncaring and callous to intentionally try to shame someone on personal matters in scientific debate.
You don't have to respond I know what's coming: "Shut up you pussy"
LOL What part of, "He started the ad hominem first", are you having trouble with?

I still wonder whose sock you are. You have come at me every which way you can since you showed up here.
 
~snip~
You don't have to respond I know what's coming: "Shut up you pussy"

I do not believe you can produce one single example of Annie responding thus, whether or not she likes her interlocutor. You project your likely answer onto her. Hmmmm.
psychiatrist-interviews.jpg
 
I do not believe you can produce one single example of Annie responding thus, whether or not she likes her interlocutor. You project your likely answer onto her. Hmmmm.
psychiatrist-interviews.jpg
Yeah last thing I would do is tell a new potential toy to shut up. I like a good fight. Oh and to answer Xiu yes on very rare occasions a peer review ended with, "That is Dr. Asshole to you!"

Practiced medicine is not science it's art and skill based on science. I am a mechanic god damnit. Singlemalt and you are the scientists. Don't tar me with that brush!

FUCK punctuation and publishing :) I'm a rebel practitioner.
 
Yeah last thing I would do is tell a new potential toy to shut up. I like a good fight. Oh and to answer Xiu yes on very rare occasions a peer review ended with, "That is Dr. Asshole to you!"

Practiced medicine is not science it's art and skill based on science. I am a mechanic god damnit. Singlemalt and you are the scientists. Don't tar me with that brush!

FUCK punctuation and publishing :) I'm a rebel practitioner.
Awww, shit, son.
 
Yeah last thing I would do is tell a new potential toy to shut up. I like a good fight. Oh and to answer Xiu yes on very rare occasions a peer review ended with, "That is Dr. Asshole to you!"

Practiced medicine is not science it's art and skill based on science. I am a mechanic god damnit. Singlemalt and you are the scientists. Don't tar me with that brush!

FUCK punctuation and publishing :) I'm a rebel practitioner.

I like being a scientist. Those pesky practical issues could always be made to go avay. After all ... it works fine in practice, but does it work in theory? :joint:

FS-Wetenschap.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top