If you think homosexuality is an unnatural condition...

Greatest I am said:
To think that placing non-reproduction in a system that requires reproduction to sustain itself is the best of all out comes for that' species is quite foolish. It would go extinct if widespread. DNA works by switches being turned on or off. To turn off the reproduction switch is definitely not the best possible end.

Regards
DL
Click to expand...

You are explaining only that you do not understand evolution, genetics, or homosexuality. You are confusing being informed with being opinionated.
 
Heisenberg said:
You are explaining only that you do not understand evolution, genetics, or homosexuality. You are confusing being informed with being opinionated.
Click to expand...


It seems that I have arguments and a logic trail for myopinion.

All I get back is denial without argument or some other logictrail.

Regards
DL
 
Greatest I am said:
Prove me wrong. Don’t get mad. Get even.

Regards
DL
Click to expand...
im what way did i demonstrate anger to you? i did not. i just said i will most likely be not having you "grow on me" because and than i stated my reason.

there is no point in changing someones mind who doesnt want to be change which is what you have already proven
 
Greatest I am said:
It seems that I have arguments and a logic trail for myopinion.

All I get back is denial without argument or some other logictrail.

Regards
DL
Click to expand...
Your premise is wrong meaning your arguments are wrong too

As long as change in DNA doesn't kill then it can carry on in species it doesn't have to be the best possible it just has to not kill

the gene is passed down the mother's side (who also seems to have more kids) so homosexuals don't need to breed to pass it on and also means there's no danger of extinction



Many people live their lives without ever breeding do you call them "defective" too?
 
Greatest I am said:
As to calling it a defect. I will continue to do so as in aspecies like ours, if too many had that defect, we would go extinct.
Click to expand...


how foolish of you to allude that homosexuality would become so prevalent as to cause a world population of some Seven Billion people to go extinct.

your barely disguised homophobia is showing
 
sunni said:
im what way did i demonstrate anger to you? i did not. i just said i will most likely be not having you "grow on me" because and than i stated my reason.

there is no point in changing someones mind who doesnt want to be change which is what you have already proven
Click to expand...


So people argue to have their minds changed. Ok.

If you only tackle people who want to change their minds, thenyou are a hindrance to your mother and not a help.

Regards
DL
 
Greatest I am said:
It seems that I have arguments and a logic trail for myopinion.

All I get back is denial without argument or some other logictrail.

Regards
DL
Click to expand...

You apparently do not understand the terms "argument" and "logic". Nothing you have said makes any sense except in the light of you being clueless and filling in the blanks with your inane suppositions. Science does not support what you say, it is up to you to prove your assertions.


“Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them" ― Thomas Jefferson
 
ginjawarrior said:
Your premise is wrong meaning your arguments are wrong too

As long as change in DNA doesn't kill then it can carry on in species it doesn't have to be the best possible it just has to not kill

the gene is passed down the mother's side (who also seems to have more kids) so homosexuals don't need to breed to pass it on and also means there's no danger of extinction



Many people live their lives without ever breeding do you call them "defective" too?
Click to expand...


In natural animal terms for an entity that must reproduce tosustain it’s species, yes.
If we were all of that ilk we would go extinct.

Regards
DL
 
ginjawarrior said:
Your premise is wrong meaning your arguments are wrong too

As long as change in DNA doesn't kill then it can carry on in species it doesn't have to be the best possible it just has to not kill

the gene is passed down the mother's side (who also seems to have more kids) so homosexuals don't need to breed to pass it on and also means there's no danger of extinction



Many people live their lives without ever breeding do you call them "defective" too?
Click to expand...


In natural animal terms for an entity that must reproduce tosustain it’s species, yes.
If we were all of that ilk we would go extinct.

Regards
DL
 
joe macclennan said:
how foolish of you to allude that homosexuality would become so prevalent as to cause a world population of some Seven Billion people to go extinct.

your barely disguised homophobia is showing
Click to expand...


Thanks for the B. S. instead of an argument against thepremise.

I did not elude any such thing.

Any and all arguments should have their logic reinforced bytaking the premise to infinity.

I am a strong advocate of gay rights but that does not mean thatI have to take some unrealistic position on what gays are or how they come tobe.

Regards
DL
 
Heisenberg said:
You apparently do not understand the terms "argument" and "logic". Nothing you have said makes any sense except in the light of you being clueless and filling in the blanks with your inane suppositions. Science does not support what you say, it is up to you to prove your assertions.
Click to expand...


B.S. seems to be all you are good for in this issue.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation

Note how they speak of genes and genetics, brain structureand chemical influences.

These are all DNA related. What in hell do you think makesup genes if not DNA?

Notice the logic trail?
Let’s see yours for whatever you attribute gayness to.

Regards
DL
 
Greatest I am said:
Content is more important than tone and I call things as Isee them.

Would you prefer I lied to you?

Regards
DL
Click to expand...

youre rude man, just rude we are people we all have feelings, to say that is astounding you could be so rude to someone.
I highly doubt you'll last long here.
 
Greatest I am said:
Thanks for the B. S. instead of an argument against thepremise.
Click to expand...

No bs simply an opinion. This is ok right?


Greatest I am said:
I did not elude any such thing.
Click to expand...
It was allude, Not elude.
e·lude(
ibreve.gif
-l
oomacr.gif
d
prime.gif
)tr.v. e·lud·ed, e·lud·ing, e·ludes1. To evade or escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill:

al·lude (
schwa.gif
-l
oomacr.gif
d
prime.gif
)intr.v. al·lud·ed, al·lud·ing, al·ludesTo make an indirect reference:


you post as if you are somewhat intelligent. At least try and use your words correctly.

Greatest I am said:
Any and all arguments should have their logic reinforced bytaking the premise to infinity
Click to expand...
Did I reinforce my logic appropriately enough for you there?
Greatest I am said:
I am a strong advocate of gay rights but that does not mean thatI have to take some unrealistic position on what gays are or how they come tobe.
Click to expand...
This is exceedingly obvious by your posts in this entire thread.

regards,
joe :joint:


sunni said:
wow buddy id watch how you speak to people
Click to expand...

I wonder who this guy was in a former life. I have a feeling he has been reincarnated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

cibulius
BISCOTTI oz
Replies
0
Views
563
cibulius
cibulius
JordanZz
How long do you think :)
Replies
0
Views
188
JordanZz
JordanZz
D
Looking for tips
Replies
1
Views
220
MtRainDog
MtRainDog
rockso15
Seedlings Leaves Look Like Cabbage Leaves
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
rockso15
rockso15
0
what grow pot/bag do you use for outdoor grow (geurilla)
Replies
3
Views
492
conor c
conor c
Back
Top