i'm glad this guy leads my country

medicineman

medicineman

New Member
Grinderdk said:
Hilarious: Chavez to Bush,, you're a Donkey

"They (White House staff) describe a President whose public persona masks an angry, obscenity-spouting man who berates staff, unleashes tirades against those who disagree with him and ends meetings in the Oval Office with “get out of here!”

In fact, George W. Bush’s mood swings have become so drastic that White House emails often contain “weather reports” to warn of the President’s demeanor. “Calm seas” means Bush is calm while “tornado alert” is a warning that he is pissed at the world."
Capitol Hill Blue's The Rant: Is Bush Out of Control?

"Secret Service members attached to White House domestic security, FBI and CIA agents, and written national security field reports all confirm that President Bush has been using drugs which could be affecting his performance as the nation’s war-time commander-in-chief.

Multiple federal agents having direct knowledge and access to Bush’s medical records say the President has switched from using Ritalin to taking Prozac while also succumbing to periodic alcoholic binges which have led to tirades and explosive personal conduct among White House aides, absent required random drug testing of all public employees and elected officials.

Federal law enforcement agents have at different times witnessed President Bush doing lines of cocaine in the early morning hours at the White House and drinking straight shots of whiskey in the evening hours on other occasions, according to U.S. intelligence sources who confirm multiple stories appearing in the tabloid press which say the First Lady is assigned to “keep an eye on him.”
Secret Service, U.S. intel say Bush uses cocaine, prozac, alcohol
Click to expand...
I've heard this from other sources, I'm thinkin it is probably true. One report says that Laura is leaving him as soon as they are out of office. You can see why he would be doing this, he is one of the most hated men on the planet and his legacy is going in the shitter, more with every passing day. I've seen a couple of speeches where he was sluring his words, and his blank stares are surely a symptom of drug and alcohol abuse.
 
GrowRebel

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
ViRedd said:
And you, GrowRebel ... Instead of backing up your false statements about Rush Limbaugh, you do nothing but spew vomit about the man. How about being specific for a change. For example, tell us what Rush "lied" about THE DAY YOU WERE LISTENING TO HIS PROGRAM.

Vi

PS: And as to the question about why Bush was elected twice, what the fuck do you liberals THINK will happen when you first put up a stiff, cardboard, empty suit like Al Gore, then follow that up with a guy who calls our military a bunch of out of control murderers who cut off ears, fingers, blow up villages, ruthlessly kill women and children and attach electric wires to the genetilia of the poor, innocents of Vietnam? All this coming from a guy who refuses to this day to produce his military records.

Vi
Click to expand...
I don't need to listen to that asshole ... just like I don't need to watch fauxnews to know they are fake news .. there's more than enough articles out there stating what he said that tells me he's a lying sack of shit ...

Unlike your hero fat boy ... that never backs his facts ... and ... why
his dumb followers do the same ... these sites back their shit up with transcripts and audio right from the horse's ass ... :roll:

There are far too many for me to post all his lies ... here's a couple ...

[URL="http://[URL="]Limbaugh on Torturing Iraqis: U.S Guards Were Just "Having a Good Time" [/url]

... and MOST of us know that was bullshit ... like his friends in the WH he's turn on by torture and kinky gay sex ...

... this more crazy with lies mixed in ...

[URL="http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/perdue1.html"]Rush Limbaugh Crosses the Line [/URL]
The patriot from Louisiana immediately called into question Limbaugh’s blatant disregard for the Constitution by praising Lincoln’s tactics in the so-called Civil War. Limbaugh was quick to point out that the Constitution was not, and probably is not, important, that the preservation of the union was. I find that interesting. A man, who claims to love freedom and independence, would rather have a despotic empire as long as the "union" is still intact.

Correction ... the illegitimate bush stole the election ... twice ...

... with Gore we may have had a better chance of NOT getting involved in an ILLEGAL war ... :roll:

... and where the fuck is the illegitimate bush's military record? That COWARD went AWOL ... and daddy got him in a special unit so the COWARD wouldn't have to go to Vietnam ... :spew:
 
J

justin2937

Well-Known Member
iblazethatkush said:
:shock::shock::shock::shock::shock: The popular vote is the vote of the people. That's the only vote that should count. Who gives a fuck what the electoral vote says.:finger:
Click to expand...
Popular vote only matters in a democracy, good thing we live in a Republic. The electoral college takes a little power away from the big states. It makes it so that someone can't appeal to the more populous states at the expense of the less populous.
 
ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
Justin ...

You are wasting your breath. Take a look at Blaze's new avitar. That says everything you need to know about a person who is devoid of any knowledge of history. In other words, what's the point?

Vi
 
GrowRebel

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
justin2937 said:
You do know that the constitution was set up so that if a situation occurred where one candidate won the popular vote and other one the electoral vote, the electoral vote would win. Popular votes are a recipe for disaster.
Click to expand...
Again you show your stupidity ... stupidity since I gave you the link with the evidence so ignorance in no longer an excuse ... the stolen election had little to do with popular or electoral votes.
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
ViRedd said:
Justin ...

You are wasting your breath. Take a look at Blaze's new avitar. That says everything you need to know about a person who is devoid of any knowledge of history. In other words, what's the point?

Vi
Click to expand...
Actually, his avatar is somewhat factual. Bush has exibited most of the traits of Hitler, he just hasn't carried them to full fruition.
 
J

justin2937

Well-Known Member
medicineman said:
Actually, his avatar is somewhat factual. Bush has exibited most of the traits of Hitler, he just hasn't carried them to full fruition.
Click to expand...
Try using a source that isn't Rolling Stone because they are really involved in the political scene and world events. Give me something from a news agency, unlike you, I check credentials before I believe.

ViRedd said:
Justin ...

You are wasting your breath. Take a look at Blaze's new avitar. That says everything you need to know about a person who is devoid of any knowledge of history. In other words, what's the point?

Vi
Click to expand...
Yeah, you can't use reason on people that have no logic.
 
GrowRebel

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
ViRedd said:
"Stolen Election." ~lol~ ... GrowRebel, you're like a one note opera.

Vi
Click to expand...

Yeah Vi ... lol is ALL you can do ... one TRUE opera note buddy ... and you have YET to dispute ANY of the evidence RFK presented in this article ... I've ask you to dispute this time and time again and all you can do is ignore it and claim I never back my statements ... typical dummy bushie ... so Vi ... when are you going to dispute the article? ... when are you going to show all us looney liberal just that? ... we're waiting ... but you just can't seem to remember to dispute Kennedy's evidence ... and you know why ... BECAUSE YOU CAN'T ... so lol is the best you or any of the rest of you lumplaugh and fauxnews groupies can do ... you never get the real facts .... so when you see it your brain can't funtion ... so ... lol ... just can't except the fact that the illegitimate bush and cheney are just that ... illegitimate ... along with the rest of their regime. :spew:
 
GrowRebel

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
justin2937 said:
Try using a source that isn't Rolling Stone because they are really involved in the political scene and world events. Give me something from a news agency, unlike you, I check credentials before I believe.
Click to expand...
What a complete and total ass ... if you BOTHERED to look at the article you would have seen the CREDIBLE links to back his evidence ... therefore you are a liar as well ... you DON'T check credentials before you believe otherwise you wouldn't be listen to limp boy ... so nice try ... but you only suceeded in making yourself look stupid ... which isn't hard to do ...
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
justin2937 said:
Try using a source that isn't Rolling Stone because they are really involved in the political scene and world events. Give me something from a news agency, unlike you, I check credentials before I believe.



Yeah, you can't use reason on people that have no logic.
Click to expand...

Justin, your lack of cleverness be-smirches the faintest hint of intellect. Try posting something of substance once in a while and maybe I will peruse it with interest, otherwise it is like bird droppings accross my computer screen~LOL~.
 
J

justin2937

Well-Known Member
did you two pompous assholes bother to read the sources?

I was going to go through each source and tell you why it sucked, but instead, I'll put it back to you. You find a source that isn't a waste of my time and I'll read it. However, don't pick from the first 5, because I already looked into them, you can see the results below.

Source 1. News article talking about these conspiracy theories that Kerry won, says DNC not stupid enough to bite.
Source 2. Editorial, not news or fact
Source 3. This isn't even a citation, no idea what they're trying to convey
Source 4. Error 404, page not found, and I doubt any survey or popular opinion is going to prove election fraud.
Source 5. Very imformative, makes no case for election fraud though

I was thinking, do something like this, nice and neat so I can see where to look. I'm dying to have you prove me wrong.
 
iblazethatkush

iblazethatkush

Well-Known Member
justin2937 said:
Try using a source that isn't Rolling Stone because they are really involved in the political scene and world events. Give me something from a news agency, unlike you, I check credentials before I believe.



Yeah, you can't use reason on people that have no logic.
Click to expand...
So where do you get your info, justin. The MSM that is told what they can and cannot air by the gov't. Yeah very credible:roll:
 
J

justin2937

Well-Known Member
medicineman said:
Thats right Justin, you win, ~LOL~. What a retard.
Click to expand...

lol, I'm still waiting for you to find me some statistic or some statement where it says "this person committed voter fraud by..." All you have presented in that news article is anecdotal evidence, which is for the most part useless. Give me solid facts that I can't argue with. Or better yet, do you know what a fact is? Fact: a truth known by actual experience or observation. Don't give me this shit where I have to go digging to find your point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top