Imaging at 1 Trillion Frames Per Sec
- Thread starter MojoRison
- Start date
Blowin' Smoke
Active Member
I love the Ted talks.
MojoRison
Well-Known Member
Not your average "Talk Show" now are they
Moebius
Well-Known Member
no Tom Cruise bouncing on the sofa like a child.Not your average "Talk Show" now are they
Moebius
Well-Known Member
I'm too paranoid of Big Bro to leave comments up like that. sorry.
but yeah, I think it has military applications
MojoRison
Well-Known Member
No worries
The ability to look into deep space and to see the universe almost as if we were there is so mind boggling.
Blowin' Smoke
Active Member
It's amazing to see the different technologies being developed, just think what another 50 years will bring. I always liked this one...[video=youtube;YVvn8dpSAt0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVvn8dpSAt0[/video]Not your average "Talk Show" now are they
Moebius
Well-Known Member
In the video the light traveling through the bottle is not 'femto' (i.e 10[SUP]−15[/SUP]) it would have to capture at a 'quadrillion' frames a second. .. In the video its travelling at 10 billionths (10x10[SUP]−9[/SUP]) which is actually 10 nano-seconds. ... That example should be called 'nano-photography' because its 10,000 times too slow. .. still very impressive.
Its crazy to actually think that there is a fundamental limit to how slow time can go 'Planck time' or 'Plank-second' (10[SUP]−44[/SUP]) ...
Its crazy to actually think that there is a fundamental limit to how slow time can go 'Planck time' or 'Plank-second' (10[SUP]−44[/SUP]) ...
BigHulk
Well-Known Member
that is mind blowing woow
like that one
The Red
Active Member
I saw this a while back on youtube but it got deleted because of copyright issues so I couldn't find it thanks for the link! It still boggles my mind. Wouldn't the camera have to be ging faster than the speed of light for this to work?