Uh, this is nuts. A/B testing is the heart of scientific method. It's the OPPOSITE of shilling. My main focus when i first came to this site was to figure out if anybody had ever used induction lighting and if so how it effected yield. Spliff's A/B test was EXACTLY the kind of thing I wanted see. I'm confused as to what the implications are. Does this mean that similar work, like what Chaz is doing is also a breach of RIU's TOS?
BTW, just sent a message to RIU:
One of the community members, Splifferous, was recently banned, apparently for advocating too strongly for a particular tech or vendor.
First I just want to say that Spliff's work was the reason I visited the sight everyday. I found his work to be incredibly meticulous, thorough, and rigorous. Really, the opposite of shilling. I don't know the man personally, and maybe there's more going on than I know, but my read was that he was driven by a passion for learning more and sharing his learning. I guess I imagine someone paid to shill would not work that hard, and most likely tend to reach for easy or canned responses. Spliff was never like that. As I say, he was meticulous.
Anyway, from my perspective, his ban makes me nervous. Could I be banned for advocating a particular tech or vendor? Do I need to modulate some passion I might develop for fear of being labeled a shill for ostrich intestinal worm saliva?
Again, perhaps there's more going on than I know, but the action definitely has a chilling/censoring effect. As someone running a discussion board I can't believe that's what you want.