What about that wager?
No, my answers were direct and germane, if you fail to see that, well it would indicate a pattern of failure on your part, given your posting history.
You love to make every conversation into a circus of precise semantics in order to deflect having to respond to salient points made by the opposition. It is, like, your thing, man. Human language is semantically imperfect, always will be. You need to get over your little "gotcha" game shit, and try to actually communicate. I'm pissed this morning, and I own that I can be an aggressive asshole, but seriously, what you do accomplishes nothing. My question to you is, what are you hoping to accomplish by saying that? Ask that question honestly of yourself before you post, and try to attain an answer. In this case, I'm trying to get you to participate in a constructive, rather than destructive or merely entropic, discussion; as distinct from playing a silly game of "gotcha" like a 12 year old in a schoolyard.
? I never said she was going to be charged. I said she deserves to be charged.
Indictment countdown means the FBI indictment. More and more evidence is piling up against her. Sorry that you didnt get the purpose of the title.
There is no money on the line. Its just a test of conviction. We can leave your grow journal out of the bet.
So, does it say she is culpable of a criminal offense in this report? What new "evidence" is piling up? The report is a rehash of earlier stuff.
No. Not intrinsically. Human beings survived and adapted through interdependent social interaction.
It's a debate. You dont have to agree with me and I dont have to agree with you.
Well, with Trump rocking the planet along with the FBI mystery this is the greatest show on earth right now . I don't want the crooked bitch taken out yet so I have no problem waiting for the FBI to release their report. good luck Dog. TRUMP!
No, you're conflating my response with your expectations. In other words, you're doing the exact thing I complained about a moment ago. You're projecting your assumptions on everyone else.
So if I don't repeat the answers everytime you ask, you declare victory...
You asked one question,
Compromise between individual humans is necessary for survival. These actions are involuntary, but beneficial, and as I said, necessary for survival. We benefit the many via the cooperation of a few. Your attempt to make a broad generalized set of behaviors an unacceptable imposition on another individual is boorish, you win nothing. You're talking to a mirror and ignoring everything anyone else says. You are in search of confirmation bias to prop up your predefined beliefs, not trying to see other perspectives. Shame on you for your intellectual dishonesty. We're all flawed, nobody has all the answers, but you're apparently of the opinion that you are not flawed, and that your opinion is the only valid one. You win nothing, you smug fuck.
