Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
How bout this deal:
We watch and wait for the election and have discussions about said election here.
Dont like it?
Indictment Countdown...
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
We watch and wait for the election and have discussions about said election here.
Dont like it?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so you're just full of shit and talking to hear yourself talk?
if you don't actually believe in what you are saying, why even say it?
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
What she did affected national security to about the same degree as jaywalking. Can you show me something in writing from a mainstream media source (e.g. not Fox or Brietbart but the NY Times or even the Dallas newspaper) that says otherwise?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You said cannabis should be legal to grow, and illegal to sell. That means you said consensual exchanges should be illegal.
You had hoped by fellating the government and agreeing to make trade in cannabis illegal, they would grant you the revocable privilege of having a couple scraggly plants in your closet. Go ahead and beg master some more, slave, it's your calling.
The longest appendage on you, is your Pinocchio nose, Prohibitionist.
Michael Huntherz
Well-Known Member
Benghazi is a ridiculous canard. If you want to know how deep the rabbit hole actually is, read this: She's a serious financial criminal, just for starters. This book was published in 1995 when a few of you were still shitting your diapers, I'm betting. Not saying there's anything wrong with being young, just that there's a whole lot of modern history hiding in the shadows that you may not have read.
Seems like there isn't one of you who actually knows what the fuck is up with the Clintons, on either side of this discussion. I respect a number of you, but the truth is much darker than you imagine, and it proves Republicans and Democrats are on the same team. And that team doesn't give a fuck about you.
Y'all should do some fucking research instead of arguing on the internet like you know what the fuck is going on. You don't. I love you all, but you don't know the real story (inasmuch as it can be known); Stop pretending you do and go read your balls and/or titties off for a few years and get back to me. If you would like a list of reading suggestions I would be glad to provide one. The thing is, you have to read the books of your 'enemies', too, not just the people you agree with.
Last edited:
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
Look it up. She was handling ALL her state business from a server at her home and the state department did not approve of her doing that.
She handles sensitive security information. That was her job. The government has special encrypted servers to keep the information safe. It is also mandatory that the government have all documents on that server so that they can keep track of communications.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
You brought up a good point, blind squirrel.
None of us can represent anybody but ourselves, unless we've given explicit individual consent to be represented. That pretty much refutes the legitimacy of a coercion based government. Good job.
The rest of your post shows your poor grasp of a Voluntaryist philosophy and is motivated by ignorance of the possible outcomes. You are regurgitating indoctrinated platitudes rather than proceeding logically and consistently.
Last edited:
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
It's not mandatory. Maybe now. But it wasn't until John Kerry took the reins at the state department
And no matter what happens
I'm still voting democrat in November and so are millions of others
But don't worry. You will still get your welfare
Michael Huntherz
Well-Known Member
Skillfully avoiding anything I said, as usual. Even my real life friends ignore me, most of the shit I post is too real, and it bums people out, so they just pretend it isn't so. Acknowledge she's the lesser of two extreme evils, at the very least, or I will consider you a coward. You are one of the people I indicated I respect, but ignoring the giant elephant I posted in this particular room is sort of chicken-shit. Maybe you're working on a response now, I don't know. I remain interested to hear your thoughts on what I wrote. I guess I should qualify my statement; If you aren't aware of the allegations in the book I posted recently then you probably don't have enough context to comment on how much of that book is true. There's a framework of awareness necessary to comprehend the big picture and, in my experience, there are startlingly few people willing to do the original research necessary to obtain a rudimentary understanding of the state of our planet's history and geo-politics at the present time. Most arguments I see, regardless of ideology, are skimming the surface of a very deep ocean of information with virtually no regard to historical context.
Last edited:
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Nice bait. I give it an 8 on a 1-10 scale.
Except I'm not advocating for crony capitalism. I'm advocating for freedom of the individual to control themself and his / her justly acquired property and the abolition of systems based in an involuntarily imposed hierarchy.
You are afraid to discuss what property is or isn't, which is why we can't have a real discussion. That's too bad, we might both learn something.
Also, when I quote some people, like Rothbard etc. I'm not endorsing everything that person ever said or did.
Flaming Pie
Well-Known Member
It was mandatory and she signed a document TELLING her it was mandatory AND showed the laws she would be violating if she had an unauthorized server that handled state business.
schnooby
Well-Known Member
youre far too nuanced and magnaminous for many people of the ilk here represented to appreciate.....or understand....
londonfog
Well-Known Member
You love making shit up. What about you is really real ?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Your point has merit. Thanks.
