injunction/court case updates

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

VIANARCHRIS said:
Cannabis Culture @CannabisCulture
Justice Phelan: "We have it all - what more entertainment could you ask for?"

either he sees through the fiasco or is being entertained because he has made his mind up.
if this judge rules against us, i think we should riot...kidding about the riot but we should send a petition to the courts for better credentials for these so called "experts"

Jackal69 · Mar 10, 2015

doingdishes said:
either he sees through the fiasco or is being entertained because he has made his mind up.
if this judge rules against us, i think we should riot...kidding about the riot but we should send a petition to the courts for better credentials for these so called "experts"

that riot statement may get you on that terrorist list in the future, bill c-51.... in 5 years when they cull the terrorists of now, what will be the terrorists of the future...... YOU when you speak out against the govt

LOL

j0yr1d3 · Mar 10, 2015

Another eventful day in court I see. Really loved the whole "tablecloth" defense and "well the word "bias" doesn't appear in the report so there can't be a bias" stuff. Crown really are just monkeys throwing shit at the wall hoping it sticks. Justice Phelan is probably just rolling his eyes every time he goes back to his chambers. Your tax dollars at work folks!

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

j0yr1d3 said:
Another eventful day in court I see. Really loved the whole "tablecloth" defense and "well the word "bias" doesn't appear in the report so there can't be a bias" stuff. Crown really are just monkeys throwing shit at the wall hoping it sticks. Justice Phelan is probably just rolling his eyes every time he goes back to his chambers. Your tax dollars at work folks!

i think they were grasping at straws for anything they could sink their teeth into but failed

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

Jackal69 said:
that riot statement may get you on that terrorist list in the future, bill c-51.... in 5 years when they cull the terrorists of now, what will be the terrorists of the future...... YOU when you speak out against the govt

LOL

i have admitted to stealing chips too....so if i'm a terrorist, i won't be a good one. they'll hear crunching

Jackal69 · Mar 10, 2015

hahaha it's good to have a sense of humour while sitting in jail, probably not in reality but always gotta keep an eye on the govt actions

WHATFG · Mar 10, 2015

We are not going to lose.

Jackal69 · Mar 10, 2015

WHATFG said:
We are not going to lose.

from what I read it's like they are giving away the win to MMAR growers.... but is it because they want to appeal or give up? it's kinda weird how it's evolving .... isn't there some sort of mercy rule the judge can put in place ... like the crown is fucked and this won by the MMAR growers??? just wierd

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

Jackal69 said:
from what I read it's like they are giving away the win to MMAR growers.... but is it because they want to appeal or give up? it's kinda weird how it's evolving .... isn't there some sort of mercy rule the judge can put in place ... like the crown is fucked and this won by the MMAR growers??? just wierd

wouldn't it be so good if we got a decision in our favour Monday

j0yr1d3 · Mar 10, 2015

Jackal69 said:
from what I read it's like they are giving away the win to MMAR growers.... but is it because they want to appeal or give up? it's kinda weird how it's evolving .... isn't there some sort of mercy rule the judge can put in place ... like the crown is fucked and this won by the MMAR growers??? just wierd

They will appeal, they will most likely lose that too. Like I said before, this is nothing new, people have been fighting the government in court for 20+ years on the issue of access. The Crown has never won a significant decision, they aren't going to win this one. Prohibition has even been struck down more then once, but reinstated with Hellth Canaduh's bullshit exemptions. They will be on the wrong side of history yet again.

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

j0yr1d3 said:
They will appeal, they will most likely lose that too. Like I said before, this is nothing new, people have been fighting the government in court for 20+ years on the issue of access. The Crown has never won a significant decision, they aren't going to win this one. Prohibition has even been struck down more then once, but reinstated with Hellth Canaduh's bullshit exemptions. They will be on the wrong side of history yet again.

either side will appeal until they can't anymore. hopefully the Crown will be doing the appealing but it's our tax dollars that will be used against us...no matter how much they waste

cannadan · Mar 10, 2015

ITS UP TO US TO STOP THEM
every time someone goes to court.....they should have it noted on the record, how much
of the tax payers money that has been wasted.
At some point....some one will get their hand slapped.

j0yr1d3 · Mar 10, 2015

doingdishes said:
either side will appeal until they can't anymore. hopefully the Crown will be doing the appealing but it's our tax dollars that will be used against us...no matter how much they waste

I agree, the whole thing is one giant waste of tax payer money. The problem is this is a hostile government that ignores the will of it's people and Hellth Canaduh is a rogue government agency that ignores science.

cannadan · Mar 10, 2015

doingdishes said:
either he sees through the fiasco or is being entertained because he has made his mind up.
if this judge rules against us, i think we should riot...kidding about the riot but we should send a petition to the courts for better credentials for these so called "experts"

including lawyers and judges?

j0yr1d3 · Mar 10, 2015

Anybody know how many lawsuits Hellth Canaduh is currently involved in? Or the Harper gooberment for that matter? We aren't the only ones fighting them. Start adding up all those dollars.

cannadan · Mar 10, 2015

they spent millions every year on pending law suits as well as stuff they appeal....
just because they can....its like a lawyer make work project.
but they are special...since they are gov. lawyers....
its like working with zero restraint, while giving zero F--Ks

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

cannadan said:
they spent millions every year on pending law suits as well as stuff they appeal....
just because they can....its like a lawyer make work project.
but they are special...since they are gov. lawyers....
its like working with zero restraint, while giving zero F--Ks

zero restraint because it's tax monies...endless supply for them

cannadan · Mar 10, 2015

ultimately its our fault I guess...since as sheeple....we let it happen.
putting one or two good politicians in to the gov will never change anything....
we need the whole group of them to be people...that will do the right thing.
educating the public...on a simple fact that if you want real change...you need to
start at the local level and form a peoples movement..then elect those people
to make the changes we all need to see in gov....changes that protect the people.... changes that are not based on
corporate profit protection, but rather on looking after the environment and people...
right now rules get made to protect big bis interests....
so connect with like minded people in your local communities and lets replace all of the politicians with
people.... real people

doingdishes · Mar 10, 2015

i agree but we have a wonky system i think. i HAVE to vote for my area & that's it. if the best person for the job happens to be a Conservative, that's a vote for Harper so i wouldn't do that so it's on to the second best...and i look at their leader & think "do I want that running my country?" i am forced to take the lesser of the evils
i like the US voting. you can vote who you want locally but you also vote for the leader. i don't understand why we can't do that here

WHATFG · Mar 10, 2015

doingdishes said:
i agree but we have a wonky system i think. i HAVE to vote for my area & that's it. if the best person for the job happens to be a Conservative, that's a vote for Harper so i wouldn't do that so it's on to the second best...and i look at their leader & think "do I want that running my country?" i am forced to take the lesser of the evils
i like the US voting. you can vote who you want locally but you also vote for the leader. i don't understand why we can't do that here

Because we aren't American.

injunction/court case updates

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member