injunction/court case updates

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,201

well 15 minutes to start and I can't find anything and no one is replying about sending tweets from the courtroom.
I am hoping someone will show up and let us know

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,202

OK..we have tweeting. case starting now

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,203

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 50s51 seconds ago
#Allard counsel John Conroy tells Justice Phelan he's happy for the 2pm start time for "us old guys"
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 24s25 seconds ago
Justice Phelan: "Yeah but it's nap time at 3"

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,204

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 40s40 seconds ago
Conroy discusses case issues. Today will be a motion to broaden the injunction

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,205

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Because of timing and circumstances of Health Canada and MMPR rules, some patients have been left without licence renewals

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,206

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Problems for patients whose licences had expired before injuction. Also problems for patients who want to change designated growers

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,207

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 2m2 minutes ago
Problems for patients who want to change addresses to a new growing locations - all of this not covered under the injunction at present

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,208

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 2m2 minutes ago
Conroy: "Clear finding by Justice Manson [who granted the injunction] that all applicants would suffer irreparable harm" with new MMPR
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 37s38 seconds ago
Justice Phelan: Isn't this Manson's way of finding a balance where many patients wouldn't be blocked without completely undoing MMPR?

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,209

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 26s27 seconds ago
Phelan: Is it my place to go back over what Manson already finely tuned?

this has been my question for a while...is this the right court?

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,210

conroy won at a higher level so he is now going backwards

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,211

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Conroy: "with all due respect it was not finely tuned" Conroy gives reasons how it would be relatively easy to record patient info to fix
John B ‏@johnberfelo 1m1 minute ago Vancouver, British Columbia
John stating judge Mansion date March 31st was only convenient for the courts not patients rights #allard

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,212

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 42s43 seconds ago
Conroy: we didn't know that Manson was going to put a 150g limit on patients
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 38s38 seconds ago
Conroy: If we did, we could have explained why limits are inappropriate for MMAR
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 18s18 seconds ago
Conroy: Because of production sites and other issues, 150g limits do not make sense. They may work under the MMPR - but not the MMAR

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,213

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 26s26 seconds ago
Conroy: not a shred of evidence that patients traveling with amounts over 150g have caused or had any problems
John B ‏@johnberfelo 24s24 seconds ago Vancouver, British Columbia
John talking about changes to production sites and storage site we're you could only carry said amount some would have to make 150 trips

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,214

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Conroy is not asking the court to allow new applications to be considered, but those in the SAM2 database should have continued access

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,215

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Conroy: what evidence is there that the injunction has interfered with the MMPR? Patients continuing to grow have not had a negative impact
Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 18s18 seconds ago
Conroy: We ask to expand the dates, delete 150 gram limit or change storage and production site to remedy problem, & allow change of address

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,216

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 29s29 seconds ago
Conroy: as it turns out, Health Canada kept no evidence to back up their claims of fire and mold. Position before Mason was overblown

 

R.Raider

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,217

doingdishes said:

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Conroy is not asking the court to allow new applications to be considered, but those in the SAM2 database should have continued access

Click to expand...

Ouch. That sucks.

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,218

John B ‏@johnberfelo 1m1 minute ago
Patient statement about having to move do to fire, another had to move storage site because no longer growing at location.....

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,219

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 1m1 minute ago
Conroy: new rules could even block patients who's street names have been changed by the gov't. Updating database would solve these problems

 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member

Jun 3, 2015

• #3,220

Cannabis Culture ‏@CannabisCulture 54s54 seconds ago
Designated growers may have an accident and can't grow for patients. These patents would be left without medicine under rules of injection