injunction/court case updates

Gmack420 said:

I've seen your grow journals kid. You wouldn't know quality weed if it was right in front of your face. You'd think it had gone bad. You're a pathetic lp investor who brags about growing his own and making money off the sick. Have at it hoss. Grow all the schwag you want and buy more shares there selling for quite the discount today!

Click to expand...

You have no idea. You know nothing of me, not even my name.
I know plenty about you, including where you buy your crack.

Have at it hoss, lose again.

x 2 @Gmack420

ricky1lung said:

They could. To think otherwise is dumb.

They have not been told to allow anyone to become a dg. They just have to allow home grows and dg's.

The libs very well could legislate what constitutes as a dg and what safety and quality assurances are in place.

I'm not the guy who needs a diagram.

Click to expand...

Apparently you are. On what basis would they not allow for patients to be DG's? The EXACT same arguments used in the injunction would apply to your LP only DG model. Price, quality, strain availability, irradiation, etc. Pretty simple really.

Ok Ok Ok folks enough of the fighting, "WE WON!" nothing more to say until 6 months or unless something happens sooner.
I am about to go hang out in the seed breeder and hydro section of the site until y'all calm down. Peace.

ricky1lung said:

You have no idea. You know nothing of me, not even my name.
I know plenty about you, including where you buy your crack.

Have at it hoss, lose again.

Click to expand...

Leave the man's " crack " alone.

CalyxCrusher said:

Apparently you are. On what basis would they not allow for patients to be DG's? The EXACT same arguments used in the injunction would apply to your LP only DG model. Price, quality, strain availability, irradiation, etc. Pretty simple really.

Click to expand...

you mean people dont like being forced to buy shit??

CalyxCrusher said:

Apparently you are. On what basis would they not allow for patients to be DG's? The EXACT same arguments used in the injunction would apply to your LP only DG model. Price, quality, strain availability, irradiation, etc. Pretty simple really.

Click to expand...

Yep. Ricky seems to think the LPC can draft draconian regulations and will be immune from any challenges.

So you have fun with rewriting the legal system Ricky, I think it's safe to say the rest of us have an appointment back on planet Earth.

CalyxCrusher said:

Apparently you are. On what basis would they not allow for patients to be DG's? The EXACT same arguments used in the injunction would apply to your LP only DG model. Price, quality, strain availability, irradiation, etc. Pretty simple really.

Click to expand...

Under the "you can grow your own or buy from approved sources" basis.

They don't have to allow just anyone to grow, they have a list of approved producers already and all they really have to do by law is give you a list of dg's to choose from.

They don't have to allow just anyone to supply meds to sick people that may be harmful in the govs eyes.

Anyone my size isnt a crackhead you fucking moron.

ricky1lung said:

You have no idea. You know nothing of me, not even my name.
I know plenty about you, including where you buy your crack.

Have at it hoss, lose again.

Click to expand...

Gmack420 said:

Anyone my size isnt a crackhead you fucking moron.

Click to expand...

Thinks he's big lol

The Hippy said:

Thanks you for saying what i couldn't seem to spit out. My Gov better not offer these private companies any help....Jeez
If they fail...too bad for them. Should have been smarter in the first place.

Click to expand...

Agreed but the sad fact is the gov helps out business every day ie tax breaks, binding arbitration, zoning etc.

saw a video from Thomas Mulcair talking about decriminalizing...,,, it;d be the first step in helping everyone. including LP's

Congrats to all patients on the win. As a caregiver for my wife I'm looking forward to being able to legally supply her needs.

Question for those looking to resume/begin growing your medical gardens. What Would you like to see for the new system? What do you predict will happen?

Personally I'd love to see a free mmj market without any government interaction whatsoever. I'd be crazy to predict this.

My current prediction that there will be 4 sources of mmj in the new regs

1) personal production
- restricted to primary dwelling only
- max % of dwelling square footage allowed to garden
- prescription limits total plant count, square footage, and wattage
- pre-Approval inspection requirement

2) dg/cg
- not residential zoning
- same prescription limits as above/patient
- pre approval inspection with random inspections
- strict requirements on reporting/ documentation
- limits set on cost to patient/ not for profit status?
- no legal route to sell overages

3) LP
-Lower barriers to entry/requirements
- distribute via Retail channels (wholly owned dispensaries or private dispensaries)

4) dispensaries
- able to sell to anyone with med license
- source products must come from LP

This would leave LPs as the only commercial producer and allow them to compete equally with each other. (if we are lucky the regulations are lowered to the point where legitimate boutique "LPs" can open and lay waste to the peddlers of shwag).

To those who fell under the old mmar what was the limitations as a cg/dg for example if I were to tend a garden for my wife at our house would we need a dppl or a ppl?

no inspection neeed unless over so many KW's lol
limits require fines and laws and control and jail... lol

everyone do with it as they please is how it should go!!!

Agreed. You could grow tomatoes inspection free. Why does the type of plant make a difference? Above a certain size I agree, but most patients won't be needing that much room, or even have it. Health Canada would be backed up waiting for inspections

I agree that we should all be left to do as we please. Unfortunately the nature of government is to get into their citizens business.

Inspections could be done my municipalities with proof being sent into health Canada. I hope I'm wrong as I'd rather not any taxpayer money be spent on this but I do think it's a possibility.

CalyxCrusher said:

Agreed. You could grow tomatoes inspection free. Why does the type of plant make a difference? Above a certain size I agree, but most patients won't be needing that much room, or even have it. Health Canada would be backed up waiting for inspections

Click to expand...

Homegrown there's no need. Unless it were for local bylaws.
A commercial product sold or provided as medication would have to be or should be regulated in some way.

we were outed once by the government. nobody from my municipality needs to be coming to my door concerning my health and use of cannabis. ever.

Medipuffs said:

we were outed once by the government. nobody from my municipality needs to be coming to my door concerning my health and use of cannabis. ever.

Click to expand...

There may be some who grow outdoors where it's not allowed, that would draw an enforcement officer to go out.

Quality inspections on home grows aren't needed, compliance to code and bylaws most certainly is. I can't see them sending inspectors out to every grow, just those who have non compliance reports made against them.

gb123 said:

it really has made the whole deal .............WIDE OPEN! ....

I have to thank Judge Phelan for seeeing the light.

Our feds how no idea what this ruling will mean,,,,,,,not many do really...

Click to expand...

CalyxCrusher said:

Agreed. You could grow tomatoes inspection free. Why does the type of plant make a difference? Above a certain size I agree, but most patients won't be needing that much room, or even have it. Health Canada would be backed up waiting for inspections

Click to expand...

I could see insurance companies wanting the inspection for policies