doingdishes
Well-Known Member
he is
injunction/court case updates
- Thread starter doingdishes
- Start date
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
@ricky1lung the DG model you have proposed takes away my right to choice. if i don't want to support a LP, i wouldn't get anything.
having a DG even grow in their own home should be the patients choice like it was before. who is the Government to force me into something i don't want. we just won our right to have choice.
if they restrict DG's to only LP type model, i would be filing a motion the next day to get my choice back
having a DG even grow in their own home should be the patients choice like it was before. who is the Government to force me into something i don't want. we just won our right to have choice.
if they restrict DG's to only LP type model, i would be filing a motion the next day to get my choice back
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
they can't take away DG's.
they way i hear you is if you are too sick, you can't chose where you get your meds...well you could chose from a list but if you aren't THAT sick, you can do it in your own home. that's not fair and there would be another challenge
ricky1lung
Well-Known Member
It's a possible scenario. I was clear in saying I was speculating but the possibility is very real. If no one talks about it, no one prepares.
Side note: he's not a big guy. He thinks he is, but, he's still a little guy with an attitude and a mouth to some guys.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i don't think it is a possibility. that takes away choice and there will be another fight
what do you consider big? over 6 ft and 200+ lbs...i consider that big and he fits the bill
ricky1lung
Well-Known Member
It takes away the ability to choose just anyone. They can do it and get away with it by legislating that only licenced producers could be deemed dg's.
I'm not saying it's fair or ideal, just that it's possible and people should be talking about the possibility of the next round of rules.
Over 6ft and 200lbs is Standard stock where I come from. No, I don't consider that big at all.
Last edited:
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
If they would allow DG's to sell overage to disp/CC it would solve some problems.
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
Seems to me that a lot of you haven't read the entire decision, and are just wasting your time speculating and arguing about here say. HC will base the new MMPR from the decision. From what I read Canada is way over prescribed cannabis compared to countries who have done actual scientific research and are considered in the forefront of medical marijuana. Cost has nothing to do with it, it comes down to reasonable access. Bottom line to me was that Canadians are protected under the charter to grow their own cannabis for personal consumption. The wording has been changed from Designated grower to caregiver, and that changes things in my opinion. Define caregiver? I think the new system will be a lot of hoops for anybody to get a ppl, they aren't just going to let patients do what ever they want, there will be restrictions. As long as they allow reasonable access for patients it will satisfy the courts.
Itsme.
Itsme.
ricky1lung
Well-Known Member
Reasonable access = ability to self produce and allowing someone else to produce if the patient cannot.
Reasonable access to "medication" does not mean any Tom dick and Harry can grow "medicine".
The gov could set restrictions on who can become a dg and grow approved "medicine" and provide a list to patients as to who has been approved to grow.
They can do it. They just might to protect their buddies who are heavily invested in the current lp model.
It's all still reasonable access and would be very difficult to challenge in court.
OGEvilgenius
Well-Known Member
Yea, I figured that some random person is probably going to have more luck with a plant they can stick on their windowsill. I told em what it is.
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
the key words are "reasonable". It was outlined in the decision, and the new MMPR will be a result of the findings in the decision. It seems pretty clear to me what's going to happen, it's spelled out in the decision.if there are 300 LP's there will be no need for "DG's" and patients will be allowed to produce for their personal needs, step out of that frame work and sell your meds. And there will be consequences. With 300 LP's there's a pretty good chance there will be several quality producers, the shitty ones will be left in the dust and fold. Storefronts must be included in the new regs. That's important for reasonable access, I foresee cc/disp. Needing to buy from a licensed producer, no more BM/grey market in theses store fronts, it will be regulated where the product comes from.
Itsme.
Itsme.
inspections??...health canada...? why???
it's already been proven to be done safely at home, in a court of law..
a few lights and some plants..tomatoes..cucs..beans...what have you...all ready for the outdoors come spring!!!
nothing left to be said!
redi jedi
Well-Known Member
LP's in regard to medical are done...They're waiting to jump on the rec wagon. Tweeds probably planning to buy them out as we speak.
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Well-Known Member
dg can have two patients right now..
yeh i guess i finally have to be positive
and think that things really might go our way
yeh i guess i finally have to be positive
and think that things really might go our way
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
I disagree, that's on the likes as saying that lab bats is done because of home brewing. I think that licences produces have a place in the system, many people will choose to buy over produce. I agree that the current "market" is a farce but with more competition it could work.
Itsme
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
So you can make educated replies instead of talking out of your ass about something you know very little about. Read the decision then come back and we can have an intellectual conversation about facts not hearsay.
Itsme.