CobKits
Well-Known Member
sure thing "VegasWinner". sorry i dont have time to pick thru all your points one by one. ill let the thousands of cobs in hundreds of rigs out there running in parallel speak for themselves.
to address one point: 96% is indeed substantially more efficient than 93.5%, esp when it can be achieved for pennies a watt and people are tripping over themselves to get incremental efficiency with cob and cooling selection and current reduction
to address one point: 96% is indeed substantially more efficient than 93.5%, esp when it can be achieved for pennies a watt and people are tripping over themselves to get incremental efficiency with cob and cooling selection and current reduction