Sure, no problem.
While not explicitly declaring Iraqi culpability in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, administration officials did, at various times, imply a link. In late 2001, Cheney said it was "pretty well confirmed" that attack mastermind Mohamed Atta had met with a senior Iraqi intelligence official. Later, Cheney called Iraq the "geographic base of the terrorists who had us under assault now for many years, but most especially on 9/11."
Transcript for Sept. 14 - Meet the Press, online at MSNBC - MSNBC.com (almost halfway down the page)
"The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001"
-George W. Bush, May 1st, 2003
President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended
When you add all this shit together, you see that the Bush Administration used 9/11 and key words like freedom (propaganda) to sell the war. Oil production has picked up since then, but Iraqis, the ones we were SUPPOSED to be liberating, still aren't seeing any revenue from oil. AMERICAN TAXPAYERS have been paying for reconstruction, not Iraqi oil money. So the question is, wheres the oil money going?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/world/middleeast/09iraq.html
Senators: Where is Iraq's oil money going? - CNN.com
Iraqs Oil Money Not Buying Health Care, When Millions From Oil Flow Out Of Iraq Every Day, Why Are So Many Citizens Suffering? - CBS News
Oh... and Rumsfield did sell Iraq anthrax and bubonic plague, along with other weapons in the early 80s. So i guess its true that Iraq did posses WMDs. Lol. Kinda hypocritical dont ya think?