Is a joint worse than a cigarrete?

oh and cannabis seeds are The most nutritional food and the only thing that perfectly fits us as a food.

on the planet.

special plant indeed.

and quite easy to claim holy with no error if one were inclined to do so.

i'll die of cancer from environmental pollutants long before i die from anything related to cannabis ingestion.

Word^.
Cigs fuck your shit up, wish i never started.

HashBrick said:

Word^.
Cigs fuck your shit up, wish i never started.

Click to expand...

What they said ......

cannabineer said:

Marijuana smoke contains formaldehyde. It stands to reason then that the tar (= condensed smoke) would contain it as well. cnhttp://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=10&ved=0CGsQFjAJ&url=http://www.ukcia.org/research/ComparisonOfSmoke.pdf&ei=IC1AT4_BOIuPigLDtLzOAQ&usg=AFQjCNGfNSd1BIfOriRxureCqYvngFlkEg&sig2=dIjo9HW4_ND9yBdECiAo9g Won't let me capitalize the first word. Damn Gov't websites.

Click to expand...

well fuck me. that's a hell of a study. while it confirms that (particular sample of) cannabis is not devoid of harmful compounds, it also proves that much more study is needed to examine several variables. it's a real shame that it's so difficult for our greatest minds to explore this stuff. there are tons of questions i have after reading that that are illegal to find the answer to. (i have read that statement about 20 times and i have no idea how to make it grammatically correct)

i'd like to know more about how the cultivation method could affect such results. the study only briefly touched on the possibility that the fertilizers could have skewed such and such.

the cannabis sample may or may not have been what we would call "cured". all we know is the end moisture content was 10%. it would be very interesting to see how much difference could be measured in the smoke itself based on the dry/cure method used.

arsenic and lead were missing from the cannabis. this is good.

weed had more ammonia, but it was noted that the sample was grown hydroponically with chemical ferts. much more study needed here.

due to cannabinoids and other assorted whatnots, comparing the presence of certain compounds proved quite difficult. the method and temperature of combustion also needs a lot more study.

i still feel a lot better about smoking my own weed than i do about smoking butts. its a lot less poisonous and the study doesn't refute it.

Total Head said:

well fuck me. that's a hell of a study. while it confirms that (particular sample of) cannabis is not devoid of harmful compounds, it also proves that much more study is needed to examine several variables. it's a real shame that it's so difficult for our greatest minds to explore this stuff. there are tons of questions i have after reading that that are illegal to find the answer to. (i have read that statement about 20 times and i have no idea how to make it grammatically correct)i'd like to know more about how the cultivation method could affect such results. the study only briefly touched on the possibility that the fertilizers could have skewed such and such.the cannabis sample may or may not have been what we would call "cured". all we know is the end moisture content was 10%. it would be very interesting to see how much difference could be measured in the smoke itself based on the dry/cure method used.arsenic and lead were missing from the cannabis. this is good.weed had more ammonia, but it was noted that the sample was grown hydroponically with chemical ferts. much more study needed here.due to cannabinoids and other assorted whatnots, comparing the presence of certain compounds proved quite difficult. the method and temperature of combustion also needs a lot more study.i still feel a lot better about smoking my own weed than i do about smoking butts. its a lot less poisonous and the study doesn't refute it.

Click to expand...

My xgf had a smoking butt.
cn

i have no idea why my post got textblocked like that. it didn't look like that when i wrote it. i fixed it though.

Total Head said:

i have no idea why my post got textblocked like that. it didn't look like that when i wrote it. i fixed it though.

Click to expand...

I know! I was a bit startled. Indeed, you must have edited that last sentence in while I clicked "reply with quote". This caused me to look twice ... was i responding to the right post?

In a gesture of magnanimity, I will not deprive you of the use of your genitals. cn

cannabineer said:

I know! I was a bit startled. Indeed, you must have edited that last sentence in while I clicked "reply with quote". This caused me to look twice ... was i responding to the right post?

In a gesture of magnanimity, I will not deprive you of the use of your genitals. cn

Click to expand...

You are oh so gracious .

Pat the stoner said:

You are oh so gracious .

Click to expand...

Oh I truly am. I could use a spare. cn