Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Cannacat said:

Can I just point out, asking if I'm clever was a reference to way earlier when he said it wasn't an intelligence test and I got a whole analysis of who I am, it was great and I was hoping for another go of that
So why is it 5 cents, please, cos that kept me awake last night!

Click to expand...

The whole lot is 110, for the bat to be 100 more than the ball the answer to the cost of the ball must be 5, the other numbers 1 to 9 don't work, that's how I did it but I get the 5 mins for the widget question not 20

714steadyeddie said:

Where is the evidence of all these “satellites”? We would like to see an actual photo of a single satellite in space. Surely NASA could easily show us just one photograph of one satellite in space? With this many, it would seem to us that you could point a camera anywhere from the International Space Station, in any direction, and get hundreds, if not thousands of satellites within one image? How is it that we don’t see the satellites from the ISS live stream? It looks like the earth is literally “swarming” with satellites, yet we have never seen a single photo or video of a real satellite in space. Why?

View attachment 3711764

Click to expand...

Wait for a clear night and look up. It won't be long before you see a satellite moving across the sky.

SunnyJim said:

Wait for a clear night and look up. It won't be long before you see a satellite moving across the sky.

Click to expand...

the sky should be filled with them I would assume...'even on the feed of the ISS there should be clear images of satellites orbiting around..

But you're right I'm sure if I was in an unpolluted area (outside Orange County) maybe I could see some

Rate of widget production is one w per machine every 5 mins, 100 machines = 100 widgets in same time period ie 5 mins

SunnyJim said:

Wait for a clear night and look up. It won't be long before you see a satellite moving across the sky.

Click to expand...

We should also should be able to see satellites when looking at the moon shouldn't we? As in it passing the moon, maybe not super clear or with the naked eye. But with a telescope none the less...


Point is it's hard to trust a "government entity" that operates are secretly as nasa does,

Do you think it's funny how all the
Missions and stuff that dons names always has a Greek god reference.

Sure doesn't mean shit to someone who doesn't understand but symbolism is huge to nasa, and if we are operating unknowingly and being exposed to this symbolism we are creating their reality unconsciously

714steadyeddie said:

the sky should be filled with them I would assume...'even on the feed of the ISS there should be clear images of satellites orbiting around..

But you're right I'm sure if I was in an unpolluted area (outside Orange County) maybe I could see some

Click to expand...

On a clear night anywhere, you'll spot them in the sky. Buy a telescope if your eyesight is poor, but they're up there.

714steadyeddie said:

the sky should be filled with them I would assume...'even on the feed of the ISS there should be clear images of satellites orbiting around..

But you're right I'm sure if I was in an unpolluted area (outside Orange County) maybe I could see some

Click to expand...

Same reason u don't see cars from the Iss

zeddd said:

The whole lot is 110, for the bat to be 100 more than the ball the answer to the cost of the ball must be 5, the other numbers 1 to 9 don't work, that's how I did it but I get the 5 mins for the widget question not 20

Click to expand...

Cheers, appreciate the effort.... but I just don't get it, it's really bugging me!

zeddd said:

The whole lot is 110, for the bat to be 100 more than the ball the answer to the cost of the ball must be 5, the other numbers 1 to 9 don't work, that's how I did it but I get the 5 mins for the widget question not 20

Click to expand...

Oh shit it's just clicked, got it!

Cannacat said:

Oh shit it's just clicked, got it!

Click to expand...

What we know:

Bat + Ball = 1.10
And
Bat - Ball = 1.0

Thus:

2(Bat) + Ball - Ball = 1.10 + 1.0

So:

2(Bat) = 2.10

Or:

Bat = 1.05

Finally:

1.10 = 1.05 + Ball

1.10 - 1.05 = Ball

0.05 = Ball

eye exaggerate said:

Had a bit of fun in here last night, was even accused of being a troll.

Someone took a grapefruit
Wore it like a hat
I saw someone under my kitchen table
Talking to my old tom cat

Click to expand...

Youse always wait til I go to bed before you pull out the good shit, then I sit here reading like 20 pages on a morning pissing myself laughing.... Then realise I'm alone and cry.

SunnyJim said:

What we know:

Bat + Ball = 1.10
And
Bat - Ball = 1.0

Thus:

2(Bat) + Ball - Ball = 1.10 + 1.0

So:

2(Bat) = 2.10

Or:

Bat = 1.05

Finally:

1.10 = 1.05 + Ball

1.10 - 1.05 = Ball

0.05 = Ball

Click to expand...

I just suddenly realised that if the ball was .10 and the bat cos 1 more than the ball then the bat would cost 1.10, which obviously isn't right. Can not believe that took me so long. In my defense, I'm under a lot of stress!

714steadyeddie said:

the sky should be filled with them I would assume...'even on the feed of the ISS there should be clear images of satellites orbiting around..

But you're right I'm sure if I was in an unpolluted area (outside Orange County) maybe I could see some

Click to expand...

I see satellites a lot, or maybe I see the same one a lot, we have really clear skies and I like to look at the constellations so I tend to notice more.

SunnyJim said:

Wait for a clear night and look up. It won't be long before you see a satellite moving across the sky.

Click to expand...

The idea that the human eye can see something as large as a refrigerator from 180 miles away zooming along at 17000 miles an hour seems sort of ridiculous and impossibleto me.

Mellowman2112 said:

The idea that the human eye can see something as large as a refrigerator from 180 miles away zooming along at 17000 miles an hour seems sort of ridiculous and impossibleto me.

Click to expand...

C'mon man, don't be so obtuse and one dimensional. You see it because it's a bright light due to reflected sunlight against a black background

Mello, it's ok, come on over to the dark side there a place in the wall for you. We can dismantle it together.

Mellowman2112 said:

The idea that the human eye can see something as large as a refrigerator from 180 miles away zooming along at 17000 miles an hour seems sort of ridiculous and impossibleto me.

Click to expand...

The idea that the human eye can see something as your imaginary Bachelor's Degree from any distance seems sort of ridiculous and impossible to me.

Singlemalt said:

C'mon man, don't be so obtuse and one dimensional. You see it because it's a bright light due to reflected sunlight against a black background

Click to expand...

So we are being told that there are thousands of satellites up there. Some, geostationary, meaning the follow along around the earth always remaining above the same spot. While other satellites like the ISS move around the ball earth at 18000 miles an hour to quote a NASA Astronaut. Ask yourself, would anybody in their right mind go into this space station, keep in mind it's already made over a hundred thousand trips around the globe. The numbers say it should already have smashed into one of the geostationary satellites.
It is hurtling around the supposed globe magically not ramming into any space junk. I'm not buying it. Looking at the NASA videos, the station has no inner doors that seal, like on a ship in case of a situation like this, although it is infinitely more dangerous in space than on the ocean. I have to call bullshit, like this cardboard door in the video below is going to protect them from the vacuum of space?

This one video totally proves the NASA fraud alone. please take 15 seconds and watch it.