Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..

Status
Not open for further replies.

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
Calm down was it the pedophile thing that hot home or my auto spell .......I will only take my finger out of my ass if you explain in great detail with love and flat earthiness and forests of diversion ....and whatever else your weird ass wants to hear .....point is my finger will stay in my ass and my dick is actually really small with one testicle .....sorry for lying reddanus ......I'm ready to hear your bullshit .....I mean truth Sorry my auto correct acts up ........k once again ssssshhhhhhh everyone it's all yours reddass
Truthfully though, have you got your finger up there... like now?
 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
Wow you totally freaked out, eh lil' buddy? Pull-your-finger-out-of-your-arse, lil' homo I meant homey. You fantasise about slapping 6 foot men, because you are vertically limited, that's OK... take your rage, your fantasy and your backwards thinking,out of this thread, you aren't witty enough and your illiterate dribbling is not even close to trolling.










Ps. You is a little bitch and your penis barely even classifies as a penis.
I like you and I can tell that flat earth believers are such smart peaceful people just by our exchange here ......brings a tear to my eye reddshlong but I can't wipe it cause both fingers are in my ass now
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
i really want to hear this gem.. if you think this, you must of never been in the woods before. also whats the diversion for? we dont need to hide this one in PM, i thought this thread was for debate
What you guys don't realize is that if you ask Reddan for his take on things, he will actually give it to you. That's the real danger here. You guys have no idea what you're in for. Please let them do PMs...
 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
i really want to hear this gem.. if you think this, you must of never been in the woods before. also whats the diversion for? we dont need to hide this one in PM, i thought this thread was for debate
More tears.....srh88 well said that's what I was trying to say before my auto spell started acting up and I still can't wipe the tears cause I've decided to keep my fingers in place until @reddan1981 shares his speach .......you guys should see what I'm typing with ....
 

Indacouch

Well-Known Member
PMs are for pussies oh and pedophiles in this particular case with reddtaint because @Kul is just a little boy and doesn't know any better and we all know I have kuls best interest in mind .......so I'm on to you @reddan1981 I watched all the to catch a predator series .......it would be in your best interest to share your theory ....because if you don't we will all know you were just here to lure a little boy into a PM situation and get a grown man to sick fingers in his ass ...........
 

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
i really want to hear this gem.. if you think this, you must of never been in the woods before. also whats the diversion for? we dont need to hide this one in PM, i thought this thread was for debate
Im afraid it is outside of your comprehensive range. If you had read my message with a little more attention you will have noted that, I discerned against 'no forests' which is a theory that suggests the earth was covered by giant trees, which, through a process not really explained,breaks down and mineralises into rock. I could break it down to an audience no problem. But I'm sure my common sense answers will baffle your tiny pea brain jk I love you dude, let's kiss and make up.
For your humour, giant trees would create giant canopies,which would block out the light and leave the undergrowth barren, what about top soil? The deepest recorded is 20 metres or so, just not deep enough to support the required root mass.... I could literally find arguments for it all day, but wouldn't that take the fun out of you bunch of dummies learning?
 

srh88

Well-Known Member
Im afraid it is outside of your comprehensive range. If you had read my message with a little more attention you will have noted that, I discerned against 'no forests' which is a theory that suggests the earth was covered by giant trees, which, through a process not really explained,breaks down and mineralises into rock. I could break it down to an audience no problem. But I'm sure my common sense answers will baffle your tiny pea brain jk I love you dude, let's kiss and make up.
For your humour, giant trees would create giant canopies,which would block out the light and leave the undergrowth barren, what about top soil? The deepest recorded is 20 metres or so, just not deep enough to support the required root mass.... I could literally find arguments for it all day, but wouldn't that take the fun out of you bunch of dummies learning?
lol... you sound upset. what about the deserts? top soil i can go with though, it is made of broken down material.. but in my area its mostly clay. but if you get under the soil, its mosty stone here
 

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
Im afraid it is outside of your comprehensive range. If you had read my message with a little more attention you will have noted that, I discerned against 'no forests' which is a theory that suggests the earth was covered by giant trees, which, through a process not really explained,breaks down and mineralises into rock. I could break it down to an audience no problem. But I'm sure my common sense answers will baffle your tiny pea brain jk I love you dude, let's kiss and make up.
For your humour, giant trees would create giant canopies,which would block out the light and leave the undergrowth barren, what about top soil? The deepest recorded is 20 metres or so, just not deep enough to support the required root mass.... I could literally find arguments for it all day, but wouldn't that take the fun out of you bunch of dummies learning?
most trees never put down roots past 5-8 feet. they grow laterally, not vertically.

care to try again? you still have two life-lines...
 

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top